Blunder | Simple Keylogger with the ability of FTP Transfer | FTP library

I'm building a web application and need to authenticate a user with a user password. I'm trying to build it to what would be considered a good security practice in 2021. As far as I've been able to gather from what I've read online, the following would be expected from sending the password from the client to the server over HTTPS (only).

[Edit: Context about the server] On the server side I intend to store a salt per user and a hashed version of their password. On the wire I obviously shouldn't send the clear text password, but also, to prevent playbacks, I shouldn't send the hashed password value either. Hence the client side algorithm below. [End edit]

1. User's password is hashed on the client [Edit: with the same salt as used server side].
2. Nonce is generated on the client [Edit: This should be server generated and given to the client, see comment]
3. The hashed password plus nonce is hashed on the client.
4. The nonce and final hash is sent from the client to the server over HTTPS.
5. Be sure to cleanup the password on the client (not in my code example).

Here is my experimental sample code:

I've boiled down the logic of something I'm struggling to figure out (new to Python, been a long time since I've done any coding). I have the code below, the intention is to roll a d6 limit times (in this case 300) and then over a defined number of iterations generate a file with the resulting dice rolls for each 300 iterations into its own file.

What I get is n (loops) files with the same data in each one. So right now this will return random1.txt, random2.txt and random3.txt and all will have the same values in them.

Obviously I need to reinitialize resultsin some way at the start of each iteration of the parent while loop (while loops >=1:), I just can't figure out how.

If anyone can take pity on a blundering artist I'd appreciate it! This is part of an art project I'm working on to make generative art with an axidraw if anyone is curious.

I'm new here

I'm having a hard time trying to figure this out and I would really appreciate some advice. I'm actually still learning python basics so please bear with me if its something stupid.

The idea is to provide a list as an input and within the list consisting of other lists. Which I'm then supposed to convert into a question and answer and storing them inside a dictionary. So far this is what I've come up with and I'm currently stuck with accessing the nested list as the first index of each list is a string e.g. ["+", "-", "*", "/"]

I'm currently getting this error:

I'm relatively new to both C++ and Wx, so I've been doing a lot of blundering around trying to get this to work over the past few hours, but I seem to have hit a figurative brick wall with this issue.

This code compiles with no errors, but when run, it does nothing. It simply remains running until terminated (e.g. with Ctrl-C), but a window never opens.

Here is the C++ source:

So, originally I was doing something that was meant to go like this:

I have a code in HomeController.php in the Laravel framework, but I could not access the index/homepage it redirects to the login page. what is the blunder I am committing?

Ok, so I am using Perforce P4V to back up my work for a Unity project. One of my teammates checked in some changes to the metafiles which broke everything. No problem though right? That's the whole point of using P4. We can just revert that. Only... revert didn't work?

The behavior I am seeing is File A was changed in changelist 1 File B was changed in changelist 2, File C And A were changed in changelist 3

Let's say Changelist 3 contains the bad change I clicked on changelist 2 in my history, then clicked get revision, and checked the Force Operation box. changelist 2 being the last known good state what I expected to happen was to have all of my files restored to the state I was in when changelist 2 was submitted.

Instead, file C was reverted, but File A was not. It's like, since file A didn't change in changelist 2 it didn't bother to get that version.

So I am in a state where all of the unity metafiles are maimed and all prefab references are broken.

When that didn't work I tried using get a revision to go back to the most current state. Then using Backout. That similarly didn't work, metafiles still maimed. I then tried selecting the last known good state and rolling the entire project folder back to that state. Again, didn't work. But then again, I may have maimed my project so badly at that point that nothing would have worked.

The only way I have found that appears to correctly be reverting the files and restoring the broken links is manually selecting each file or folder and reverting it to the last good commit, which is different for each file/folder since they were added and changed in different commits.

What I don't understand is why the force get revision didn't do that on its own. Or what the "correct" way to undo a bad commit is.

I even tried deleting the entire assets folder then using get revision force to pull an entirely new copy from the server using the last known good commit. This appeared to work perfectly once, but when I tried to repeat it to verify my results it went back to losing all of the meta file links. The only dependable way of getting back into a good state appears to be manually force getting each file and folder to the individual last known good commit.

I have consigned myself to having to manually fix my blunder this time, but I'd really appreciate help to know how to do this the right way for the future.

I tried all ways to display data from the database (Firebase realtime database) There're following config rules:

beginner programmer here, trying to make an app that detects blunders and wanting to learn more about the chess.engine library.

I assume that using the analyse function is a discrete, self-contained process that doesn't rely on cache or memory of previous calls from the engine or anything like that.

If this is the case, why do I get multiple different evaluations when calling analyse multiple times in a script: