mutilate | Mutilate : high-performance memcached load generator | Performance Testing library
kandi X-RAY | mutilate Summary
kandi X-RAY | mutilate Summary
Mutilate: high-performance memcached load generator
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of mutilate
mutilate Key Features
mutilate Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on mutilate
QUESTION
We are using GIT for deployment and it's all working splendidly. At the moment I'm writing functionality to allow a client to switch to another Deployment repository - after all we may at some point decide to start deploying from a different location, right?
We create the repository in Azure and we Generate GIT Credentials using the button after creating the Repository:
So I present the user with a form where they can enter a new URL, a Username and a Password, and then I go check .... (vb.net code)
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-11 at 09:00Is this a bug in dev.azure.com's way of doing GIT? Why have a "username" at all if it > > gets ignored anyway?
Nope, this is the expected action since you are using Git Credential Manager (GCM)
to generate the password.
In fact, it is not an officially password. What it generated is a Personal access token after you click the button Generate Git Credentials
, and its scope only to Repos(Read&Write)
.
At this time, go Security
(https://dev.azure.com/{orgname}/_usersSettings/tokens) page, you will see there has one token be added which Token name
is like git: https://dev.azure.com/{orgname} on {machine platform}.
For Personal access token, I'm sure you'd known that the PAT token are tied to a single user account when it generated. In another word, you doon't need input the username additionally while using PAT as authorize method. That's why the username get ignored anyway.
You can also check this doc to get How the Git Credential Managers works
Is this something I need to worry about?
Just treat it as password to keep secret will not cause too much issue.
Most of time, you don't need worry it. Because this token will expired very soon, will not longer than 1 day.
Also, as I mentioned above, the scope of this token are only to Repos with Read&Write
permission. Even if someone accidentally gets this token, they can not make operation outside the Repos.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install mutilate
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page