freestanding | On Linux , for example | GPU library

I have 2 batches of documents. In batch 1, I need to merge pit/score when its SPID equals to characteristic/score/SPID. The expected merge looks like batch 2 documents, characteristic/score/default is the merged content of pit/score. If the document already has the characteristic/score/default then keep it as it is.

I am developing a freestanding application for an ARM Cortex-M microcontroller and while researching the structure of an S-Record file I found that I have some kind of misunderstanding in how the addresses are represented in the S-Record format.

I have a variable defined in my source code like so:

Let's say I have a simplified class Object:

Context: C compilers deliberately do not support some features while being conforming implementations. Is it ok?

Some examples. All of the compilers down below are conforming implementations (__STDC__ is defined to 1). However:

• gcc does not support #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS and issues warning: ignoring ‘#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS’ [-Wunknown-pragmas]. However, fenv.h is a standard header, and support of #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON is required by the standard, because ON is one of the choices in on-off-switch: ON OFF DEFAULT.

• msvc does not support #pragma STDC FP_CONTRACT and rather supports its own version #pragma fp_contract ( { on | off } ). However, the standard version is #pragma STDC FP_CONTRACT { ON | OFF | DEFAULT }.

• gcc on Cygwin: sscanf doesn't handle hexadecimal floating-point input. And libc is a part of the standard.

Question: is it allowed for an implementation to deliberately provide a limited functionality (or its own version of such functionality) and still be conforming implementation at the same time?

Reason of the question: better understanding of the definition of conforming implementation and the state of affairs around existing conforming implementations.

Note: here the area of interest is conforming hosted implementation only. However, the question is applicable for conforming freestanding implementation as well.

UPD. Again: __STDC__ is defined to 1 means maybe conforming implementation rather than conforming implementation. Any discrepancy with the standard automatically makes such implementation be "nonconforming implementation that defines __STDC__ to 1".

I'm trying to adjust KODI's search filter with regex so the scrapers recognize tv shows from their original file names.

They either come in this pattern: "TV show name S04E01 some extra info" or this "TV show name 01 some extra info" The first is not recognized, because "S04" scrambles the search in a number of ways, this needs to go. The second is not recognized, because it needs an 'e' before numbers, otherwise, it won't be recognized as an episode number.

So I see two approaches.

1. Make the filter ignore s01-99

2. prepend an 'e' any freestanding two-digit numbers, but I worry if regex can even do that.

I have no experience in the regex, but I've been playing around coming up with this, which unsurprisingly doesn't do the trick

I am about to design and implement a kind of smart pointer toolkit - a set of classes to define various types of smart pointers like unique_ptr, intrusive_ptr, shared_ptr, observing_ptr, tagged_ptr etc. Just to mention I am working in freestanding environment where I have no c++ library available. My intersion is to avoid code duplications, make it follow an elegant design principle. Let me describe my thoughts in there.

Design Considerations: I wanna use variadic CRTP approach to mixin the desired pointer features, the traits. For every feature set there shall be once trait class like:

I very much am a macro noob and apologize for the likely dumb question.

I'm trying to build a macro that will find a replace a series of of footnote placeholders with the footnotes themselves, i.e.:

Text

Before music recording artists like Billy Joel, The Police, Journey, and Kool & the Gang rose to international stardom, they transferred or licensed all of their sound recording copyrights to labels, via recording contracts, in exchange for royalties and advancements.[mfn]1[\mfn] The terms of such contracts are reflective of idiosyncratic negotiations, industry customs, and the weak bargaining power of recording artists compared to the record label.[mfn]2[\mfn] Even so, artists have a second bite at the apple: the Copyright Act of 1976 [mfn]3[\mfn] allows artists to terminate any prior grant “notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary” at least thirty-five years after the initial grant for works created “on or after January 1, 1978.”[mfn]4[\mfn] Termination rights safeguard authors and improve bargaining positions by giving authors a second opportunity “to negotiate more advantageous grants in their works after the works ha[ve] been sufficiently ‘exploited’ to determine their ‘value.”’[mfn]5[\mfn]

I'm trying to replace each of the footnote holders with formatted text that could be plain, italicized, and even small caps. I would just manually cut and paste each, but there hundreds of footnotes per document and hundreds of documents. Right now, my intended replacement footnotes live in word tables at the bottom of each document but I gather I'll need to move them to an excel document where Column A are the footnote holders (i.e. [mfn]1[\mfn], [mfn]2[\mfn], etc.) and Column B is the text I want to replace the holders. However, that could be completely wrong.

I know it's common practice to insert the code I've already tried, but it's so hopeless it would be an insult to everyone. I'm having trouble: (1) writing a Word Macro to retrieve the values from a freestanding excel sheet; (2) keeping the source formatting; and (3) not wrecking everything in the process.

Any assistance would be much appreciated.

Update

To clarify, I'm trying to create plain text footnotes for Wordpress from a document using alternative footnotes(i.e. not Word's default footnotes).

This is the code I'm using, and the issue I'm stuck is a error 5854 for a parameter string being too long (often the FNs are well over 250 characters):

I am crawling a website that has a SELECT that are freestanding with no FORM parent and no NAME, only ID.

The issue is about linking x86_64 macOS executables statically against libavcodec, libavdevice, etc, which have some object files built against freestanding as they use YASM which isn't able to embed the macOS "tag" in the binary (see Building for macOS, but linking in object file built for free standing for detailed information on that issue).

Everything works fine under Xcode 11.6 - the following messages are here, but they are warnings. With the Xcode 12 update they become an error. How to make them warnings again ? I could not find anything relevant in the ld man page.

ld: in ffmpeg/lib/libavcodec.a(aacencdsp.o), building for macOS, but linking in object file built for free standing, for architecture x86_64