recastnavigation | Navigation-mesh Toolset for Games
kandi X-RAY | recastnavigation Summary
kandi X-RAY | recastnavigation Summary
[Issue Stats] ![screenshot of a navmesh baked with the sample program] /RecastDemo/screenshot.png?raw=true).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of recastnavigation
recastnavigation Key Features
recastnavigation Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on recastnavigation
QUESTION
I am currently running Azerothcore via docker on my centos 7 server. I am trying to update it with the updates since i originally set it up.
current docker version:
Docker version 19.03.12, build 48a66213fe
current docker-compose version:
docker-compose version 1.18.0, build 8dd22a9
Here is the build command i ran:
./bin/acore-docker-build
When i run the docker build command i am getting the following errors:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-02 at 19:30i rebased my fork with the current master branch. Removed all the files in the src directory. Then did a git hard reset. Then ran git pull. Ran the remove build cache script again. Then kicked off another build. Build is working fine again with the current master branch. So i am guessing the issue was with my src directory not being in sync with the fork repo.
QUESTION
When I use this lib, they declare & usage an Array of Vector3 like this (not exactly like, but ideally like)
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Nov-20 at 03:15The contents of array
and vector
are required to be contiguous. However, the ability to jump from one sub-element of an array
/vector
element to a sub-element of another array
/vector
element is not guaranteed.
That is, you cannot jump from arr[0][3]
to arr[1][0]
just by incrementing a float*
. Even ignoring strict standard wording for pointer arithmetic, an array
is allowed to have padding, so sizeof(array)
is not required to be sizeof(T[N])
. Multidimensional vector
s are even more problematic, as each element vector
has its own allocation, which will certainly not be contiguous with other allocations.
If the answer is not guaranteed that this is true, it is prefered to point out a circumstance that it would be wrong.
It's always wrong. Multiple vector
elements of a vector>
will have different allocations. Period.
As for array
, C++ does not allow pointer arithmetic across arrays, only within an array. And if you want to ignore that (you will neither be the first nor the last), it will still fail any time sizeof(array) != sizeof(T[N])
. And that cannot be known a priori; it is an implementation detail and will vary from compiler to compiler, from T
to T
, and from N
to N
.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install recastnavigation
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page