Shellcoding | Shellcoding utilities | Hacking library

 by   Mr-Un1k0d3r C Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | Shellcoding Summary

kandi X-RAY | Shellcoding Summary

Shellcoding is a C library typically used in Security, Hacking applications. Shellcoding has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Shellcoding Utilities and shellcode obfuscator generator.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              Shellcoding has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 166 star(s) with 35 fork(s). There are 10 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              Shellcoding has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of Shellcoding is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              Shellcoding has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              Shellcoding has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              Shellcoding code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              Shellcoding does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              Shellcoding releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              Shellcoding saves you 16 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 46 lines of code, 1 functions and 3 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Shellcoding
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            Shellcoding Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for Shellcoding.

            Shellcoding Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for Shellcoding.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Re-use string at known address to save bytes and reduce size of shellcode payload
            Asked 2019-Aug-14 at 05:21

            Edit: DISCLAIMER- This is for educational purposes only as I am trying to learn shellcoding in x86 asm -- this is not a request for assistance in writing an in-the-wild exploit in any way.

            Basically what I am asking for here - regardless of the "why" I am asking for it is to learn how to take a known piece of information stored in memory such as:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Aug-14 at 03:26

            After another look at the question, your actual question was about concatenating stuff with a runtime-variable C-string from a known address in the target system. Like sprintf(buf, '\\%s\x.dll', 0x00xxxxxx).

            (Actually it turns out it's actually a known constant length and value, and you were just trying to save payload size by copying it.) Update, see below for 35 byte versions that hard-code the whole string in the payload, and a 31-byte version that builds the \\...\x.dll string around the string instead of copying.

            Copying data small amounts of data is hard. x86 instructions take code-size for the opcode and for the addressing modes (register or memory) of your data, unless except for instructions with implicit operands like stos or movsb, or push. And even those still use bytes for the opcode. Repeated single-byte elements are hard to take advantage of. At a large scale, if you have room to write a decompressor, you could include run-length encoding or even Huffman coding. But when your data isn't much bigger than a few instructions, it's all just little tricks like in the last part of this answer.

            But maybe efficiently hard-coding it can be small enough, without reading the 13-byte IP address from a known address (which takes at least 7 bytes to generate in a register with mov eax, imm32 / not eax to avoid 0 bytes in the immediate)

            Two ways to hard-code fixed strings in payloads

            In 32-bit mode, repeated push imm32 will build up an arbitrary-length string on the stack (in reverse order, of course).

            Start by pushing an xor-zeroed register to get a 0-terminated C string. Your literal string is pure text, so I don't see any reason to worry about zero bytes other than that. But if you did, pad with a filler character and overwrite it with a byte-store from your zero register.

            If it's not naturally a multiple of 4 bytes, you can sometimes expand \ to \\ or \\\ or \.\ in paths. Or use push imm8 for the last character (which you push first), also pushing 3 bytes of zeros for free. (Assuming your character is 1..127 so sign-extension produces zeros instead of 0xFF). For this case specifically, WinExec splits on spaces so push ' ' can push a space + terminating 0 bytes.

            And/or if 4-byte alignment of the stack isn't needed, use 4-byte push word imm16 for the last 2 bytes of data (operand-size prefix + opcode + 2 bytes of data = 4 bytes of code).

            The payload-size overhead is 1 push opcode byte per 4 string bytes, plus the terminator, with the string size potentially padded up to a multiple of 4 byte.

            The other main option is to include the string as literal data after the payload.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57469740

            QUESTION

            shellcode error Segmentation fault (core dumped)
            Asked 2018-Dec-03 at 16:10

            im new at shellcoding i try to write a shellcode for ( hello world ) so this is my first code with nulled bytes :

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Dec-03 at 16:10

            i solve it by changing

            char shellcode[]

            to

            const char shellcode[]

            and using using the JMP/CALL/POP method

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53592134

            QUESTION

            Segfault when running hello world shellcode in C program
            Asked 2017-Oct-09 at 14:58

            sorry if this question sounds dumb but I am very new to shellcoding and I was trying to get a hello world example to work on a 32 bit linux machine.

            As this is shellcoding, I used a few tricks to remove null bytes and shorten the code. Here it is:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Oct-09 at 14:58

            Your shellcode does not work, because it is not entered in the correct endianness. You did not state how you extracted the bytes from the file print4, but both objdump and xxd gives the bytes in correct order.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46581854

            QUESTION

            Difference between running an assembly program and running the disassembled code in shellcode.c
            Asked 2017-Apr-26 at 12:11

            I am currently working on 'Pentester Academy's x86_64 Assembly Language and Shellcoding on Linux' course (www.pentesteracademy.com/course?id=7). I have one simple question that I can't quite figure out: what is the exact difference between running an assembly program that has been assembled and linked with NASM and ld vs. running the same disassembled program in the classic shellcode.c program (written below). Why use one method over the other?

            As an example, when following the first method, I use the commands :

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Apr-26 at 12:11

            There is no theoretical difference between the two methods. In both you end up executing a bunch of assembly instructions on the processor.

            The shellcode.c program is there to just demonstrate what would happen if you run the assembly defined as an array of bytes in the unsigned char code[] variable.

            Why use one method over the other?

            I think you don't understand the purpose of shellcodes and the reasoning behind the shellcode.c program (why it shows what happens when an arbitrary sequence of bytes you have control on is executed on the processor).

            A shellcode is a small piece of assembly code that is used to exploit a software vulnerability. An attacker usually injects a shellcode into software by taking advantage of common programming errors such as buffer overflows and then tries to make the software execute that injected shellcode.

            A good article showing a step-by-step tutorial on how to generate a shell by performing shellcode injection using buffer overflows can be found here.

            Here is how a classic shellcode \x83\xec\x48\x31\xc0\x31\xd2\x50\x68\x2f\x2f\x73\x68\x68\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x89\xe3\x50\x53\x89\xe1\xb0\x0b\xcd\x80 looks like in assembler:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43624389

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install Shellcoding

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/Mr-Un1k0d3r/Shellcoding.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone Mr-Un1k0d3r/Shellcoding

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:Mr-Un1k0d3r/Shellcoding.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Hacking Libraries

            wifiphisher

            by wifiphisher

            routersploit

            by threat9

            XSStrike

            by s0md3v

            pwntools

            by Gallopsled

            Atmosphere

            by Atmosphere-NX

            Try Top Libraries by Mr-Un1k0d3r

            EDRs

            by Mr-Un1k0d3rC

            PowerLessShell

            by Mr-Un1k0d3rPython

            DKMC

            by Mr-Un1k0d3rPython

            SCShell

            by Mr-Un1k0d3rC

            RedTeamPowershellScripts

            by Mr-Un1k0d3rPowerShell