DDos-Attack | simple DDoS Attack tool and even a begginer hacker | Hacking library

by ProgrammerGaurav C Version: Current License: GPL-3.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | DDos-Attack Summary

DDos-Attack is a C library typically used in Security, Hacking applications. DDos-Attack has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Strong Copyleft License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This is a simple DDoS Attack tool and even a begginer hacker can use this.Just type python run.py after cloning this repository.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

DDos-Attack has a low active ecosystem.

It has 135 star(s) with 22 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 1 open issues and 3 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 42 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of DDos-Attack is current.

Quality

DDos-Attack has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

DDos-Attack has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

DDos-Attack code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

DDos-Attack is licensed under the GPL-3.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.

Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

Reuse

DDos-Attack releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

It has 13 lines of code, 0 functions and 1 files.

It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of DDos-Attack

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

DDos-Attack Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for DDos-Attack.

DDos-Attack Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for DDos-Attack.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on DDos-Attack

Protect an unauthenticated Cloud Run endpoint

QUESTION

Protect an unauthenticated Cloud Run endpoint

Asked 2019-May-13 at 06:00

when I make an unauthenticated (public) Cloud Run endpoint to host an API, what are my options to protect this endpoint from malicious users making billions of HTTP requests?

For $10 you can launch a Layer 7 HTTP flood attack that can send 250k requests per second. Let's assume your Cloud Run endpoints scale up and all requests are handled. For invocations alone, you will pay $360,-/hour (at $0.40 per million requests).

Note that there is a concurrency limit and a max instance limit that you might hit if the attack is not distributed over multiple Cloud Run endpoints. What other controls do I have?

As I understand, the usual defenses with Cloud Armor and Cloud CDN are bound to the Global Load Balancer, which is unavailable for Cloud Run, but is available for Cloud Run on GKE.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-May-13 at 06:00

For unauthenticated invocations to a Cloud Run service with an IAM Cloud Run Invoker role set to the allUsers member type, I would expect the answer to be the same as those provided here - https://stackoverflow.com/a/49953862/7911479

specifically:

Cloud Functions sits behind the Google Front End which mitigates and absorbs many Layer 4 and below attacks, such as SYN floods, IP fragment floods, port exhaustion, etc.

It would certainly be great to get a clear Y/N answer on Cloud Armor support.

[Edit]: I have been thinking on this quite a lot and have come to the following conclusion:

if you expect you are likely to become a victim of an attack of this type then I would monitor your regular load/peak and set your account's ability to scale just above that load. Monitoring will allow you to increase this as your regular traffic grows over time. It appears to be the only good way. Yes, your service will be down once you reach your account limits, but that seems preferable in the scenario where you are the target.

An idea which I am yet to try is a protected route with Firebase Authentication and anonymous authentication.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55716767

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install DDos-Attack

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: