buf | C string buffer library | Runtime Evironment library

Those are stray bytes like *, %, etc. prefixed with some of the lines.

The stray bytes appear to be a custom stream multiplexing protocol, allowing STDOUT and STDERR to be sent down the same connection.

Using stdcopy.StdCopy() interprets these custom headers and those stray characters are avoided by removing the protocol header for each piece of data.

Refer: https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/pkg/stdcopy/stdcopy.go#L42

The code just needs to declare buf[11] so there's room to append the CRC, then append the CRC. Some other were changes made to work with Visual Studio (the indented blocks used for local variables). The CRC calculation could be simplified.

Yes. The standard defines "pseudo-destructor calls", so that something like ptr->~T() or ref.~T() is valid for built-in scalar types (§[expr.prim.id.dtor]):

1. An id-expression that denotes the destructor of a type T names the destructor of T if T is a class type (11.4.6), otherwise the id-expression is said to name a pseudo-destructor.
2. If the id-expression names a pseudo-destructor, T shall be a scalar type and the id-expression shall appear as the right operand of a class member access (7.6.1.4) that forms the postfix-expression of a function call (7.6.1.2). [Note: Such a call has no effect. —end note]

For better or worse, the same thing is not done for other operators that are valid on built-in scalar types, so (as you've found) you can't refer to some_int.operator=, for example).

There has been (considerable) discussion of some sort of uniform function call syntax, that would allow the compiler to sort out at least some things like this, but although it's been proposed at least a couple of times (early on by Francis Glassborrow, more recently by Bjarne and Herb Sutter), it hasn't been accepted. If you're interested in this apart from using it in C++, D does support something on this order you might find interesting to look into.

Outside of that, although it's not as easy as you'd probably like, you can probably use SFINAE to select between foo = bar; and foo.operator=(bar);, if you really need to do so (though I'll admit, I'm not sure what advantage you get from the .operator= syntax).

To represent 3 columns with collectionview, each cell has to be width of 1/3 of the display. (Since 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1)

So try the code below, I have changed the width of the cell:

Any Ideas why the IOCP is not passing the Completion Key?

of course it passing back exactly what you pass to CreateIoCompletionPort and I/O in place pointer to OVERLAPPED

but at first

Since Postman worked, your backend is setup properly. Now on to your frontend.

Axios handles multipart form data if your data is an instance of FormData.

1. In your component you can set a state variable to hold the selected file

While I do not know how to deal with this problem directly, I had a somewhat similar issue(and solved). The difference is:

• I use fairseq
• I can run my code on google colab with 1 GPU
• Got RuntimeError: unable to mmap 280 bytes from file : Cannot allocate memory (12) immediately when I tried to run it on multiple GPUs.

From the other people's code, I found that he uses python -m torch.distributed.launch -- ... to run fairseq-train, and I added it to my bash script and the RuntimeError is gone and training is going.

So I guess if you can run with 21000 samples, you may use torch.distributed to make whole data into small batches and distribute them to several workers.

@ima, Accessing L2|L3|L4 are easily covered in DPDK examples. For your particular requirement DPDK example, l3fwd easily covers the scenario. Hence my humble recommendation is to refer to such an application first.

The answer to your query is the way in which you are trying to access the L3 headers is incorrect. To properly access the L3 header you will need to changes from

Nothing is overflowed. Your program reads one character from stdin and then exits. Any characters after that are read by the shell.