lvm2 | Mirror of upstream LVM2 repository

 by   lvmteam C Version: v2_03_21 License: GPL-2.0

kandi X-RAY | lvm2 Summary

kandi X-RAY | lvm2 Summary

lvm2 is a C library. lvm2 has no bugs, it has a Strong Copyleft License and it has low support. However lvm2 has 1 vulnerabilities. You can download it from GitHub.

This tree contains the LVM2 and device-mapper tools and libraries. This is development branch, for stable 2.02 release see stable-2.02 branch. For more information about LVM2 read the changelog in the WHATS_NEW file. Installation instructions are in INSTALL. There is no warranty - see COPYING and COPYING.LIB. Tarballs are available from: ftp://sourceware.org/pub/lvm2/ The source code is stored in git: git clone git://sourceware.org/git/lvm2.git mirrored to: git clone git clone git@github.com:lvmteam/lvm2.git. Mailing list for general discussion related to LVM2: linux-lvm@redhat.com Subscribe from Mailing lists for LVM2 development, patches and commits: lvm-devel@redhat.com Subscribe from lvm2-commits@lists.fedorahosted.org (Read-only archive of commits) Subscribe from Mailing list for device-mapper development, including kernel patches and multipath-tools: dm-devel@redhat.com Subscribe from Report upstream bugs at: or open issues at:
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              lvm2 has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 93 star(s) with 62 fork(s). There are 17 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 29 open issues and 77 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 249 days. There are 4 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of lvm2 is v2_03_21

            kandi-Quality Quality

              lvm2 has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              lvm2 has 1 vulnerability issues reported (0 critical, 0 high, 0 medium, 1 low).
              lvm2 code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              lvm2 is licensed under the GPL-2.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.
              Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              lvm2 releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of lvm2
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            lvm2 Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for lvm2.

            lvm2 Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for lvm2.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Why the printf( ) is working strangely after reopening stdout stream
            Asked 2022-Jan-27 at 21:27

            After reopening STDOUT stream, the message does not display on my screen if calling print() like this:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-27 at 21:27

            Assigning to stdout (or stdin or stderr) is Undefined Behaviour. And in the face of undefined behaviour, odd things happen.

            Technically, no more needs to be said. But after I wrote this answer, @zwol noted in a comment that the glibc documentation claims to allow reassignment of standard IO streams. In those terms, this behaviour is a bug. I accept this fact, but the OP was not predicated on the use of glibc, and there are many other standard library implementations which don't make this guarantee. In some of them, assigning to stdout will raise an error at compile time; in others, it will simply not work or not work consistently. In other words, regardless of glibc, assigning to stdout is Undefined Behaviour, and software which attempts to do so is, at best, unportable. (And, as we see, even on glibc it can lead to unpredictable output.)

            But my curiosity was aroused so I investigated a bit. The first thing is to look at the actual code generated by gcc and see what library function is actually being called by each of those output calls:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70879665

            QUESTION

            Search arrays inside ansible msg output
            Asked 2022-Jan-11 at 18:50

            Ansible-newbie here.

            I am struggling with understanding how to check if a value exists in an array returned from a previous task. Im trying to search if a volume exists in any array of volumes returned from a search:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-11 at 18:50

            QUESTION

            Im trying to add additional space to my virtual machine. I went from 250GB to +750GB but am having trouble adding it to the lvm
            Asked 2021-Oct-20 at 12:10

            Current my pv looks like this

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-20 at 08:00

            Curently your VG have those gigabytes, check your screens:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69632601

            QUESTION

            How to activate NFS server protocol v4 on Ubuntu 20.04 / Armbian 21.08
            Asked 2021-Oct-12 at 08:47

            I just installed Armbian on my SBC running Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS (Focal Fossa). Output of cat /etc/os-release is:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Oct-12 at 08:47

            In the Armbian community I found a post which answered my question.

            Even after installing NFS via apt-get install nfs-kernel-server it only installs the user-space support.

            This is the original package info from https://packages.debian.org/sid/nfs-kernel-server:

            This package contains the user-space support needed to use the NFS kernel server.

            That means what NFS version is supported depends on the kernel on compile time. And even NFSv4 and above is over 10 years only it can be activated/deactivated in the so called kernel config which looks like:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69428233

            QUESTION

            std::filesystem recursive iterator will throw permission_denied even when skip_permission_denied is in use
            Asked 2021-Mar-11 at 12:30

            I am writing a linux command line program that will return the size of a directory. The program works as expected, except when specifically dealing with root directories. I know many files in the root directory do not have sizes because they are special files used to represent system information (like /proc/) or something like /dev/null/, so I used std::filesystem::directory_options::skip_permission_denied in my for loop to skip permission issues and I used multiple try/catch blocks to catch exceptions.

            However, even with this, a permission denied exception is still thrown. See the following code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-11 at 12:30

            The docs on cppreference say that skip_permission_denied is to "Skip directories that would otherwise result in permission denied errors.". It says nothing about files, only about directories. The option means that in case you cannot read "/proc/sys/xyz" this directory is skipped and no exception is thrown. In your case this is respected and you do not get a filesystem_error exception from recursive_directory_iterator. But that is not related to any file that this iterator returns.

            But an exception is thrown in std::filesystem::exists(p) and in std::filesystem::is_directory(p). It is thrown by std::filesystem::status which is internally called by both functions. en.cppreference says that in status "symlinks are followed to their targets". This is not possible for /proc/1/task/1/cwd if you are not root.

            ls -alg /proc/1/task/1/cwd shows me a file mode lrwxrwxrwx but a permission denied message.

            $ ls -alg /proc/1/task/1/cwd
            ls: Lesen der symbolischen Verknüpfung '/proc/1/task/1/cwd' nicht möglich: Keine Berechtigung
            lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 0 Mär 11 08:53 /proc/1/task/1/cwd

            I believe that the recursive_directory_iterator is only looking at the file mode, but cwd seems to be special and additional access rules apply. So a solution for you could be to catch exceptions thrown by std::filesystem::exists or std::filesystem::is_directory, ignore them and proceed.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66559208

            QUESTION

            Manjaro not showing up in systemd-boot
            Asked 2021-Feb-07 at 23:13

            After hours of trying I'm not able to get Manjaro (Luks, btrfs, lvm) to show up in my systemd-boot menu, and I can't figure out why.

            Manjaro is set up with Luks encryption, a btrfs file system, and with LVMs. Boot manager is installed at /boot/efi

            Previous to Manjaro, I was already dual booting PopOS and Windows, which were set up with systemd-boot. I have installed Manjaro with the architect image, and selected systemd-boot as the bootloader. After rebooting, the only entry that showed up was Windows. The PopOS entry I managed to fix by chroot'ing into the installation and running update-initramfs.

            What I have tried:

            1. Running sudo mkinitcpio -p linux59 inside chroot
            2. Running sudo boot --path="/mnt/boot/efi install" from my host (Pop)
            3. Manually adding the file /boot/efi/loader/entries/Manjaro.conf:
            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Feb-07 at 23:13

            Solved the issue. As the boot files were installed in /boot, but the bootloader was installed in /boot/efi, the relative path was the latter rather than the former. Solved it by copying the boot files to a dir inside /boot/efi

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66092165

            QUESTION

            Free space on disk is not available
            Asked 2021-Jan-27 at 07:37

            I used parted to extend my disk as I would do normally and it appeared successful showing the new 140GB disk.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jan-27 at 07:37

            You need resize FS. For ext do:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65910666

            QUESTION

            AWC EC2 Amazon Linux 2 Instances failed to boot after applying os updates
            Asked 2020-Oct-30 at 11:21

            Yesterday we lost contact with 10 identically configured servers, after some investigation the conclusion was that a reboot after security updates had failed.

            We have so far not been able to get any of the servers back online, but were lucky enough to be able to reinstall the instances without data loss.

            I will paste the console log below, can anyone help me determine the root cause and perhaps give me some advice on if there is a better way to configure the server to make recovery easier (like getting past the "Press Enter to continue." prompt, that it seems to hang in).

            The full log is too big for SO, so I put it on pastebin and pasted a redacted version below. I have removed the escape sequences that colorize the output and removed some double new lines, but besides that it is complete.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-30 at 11:21

            Ok, shortly after posting we figured it out. Seems like a mount point has changed (I expect due to a linux kernel update) and we have not used the nofail option in /etc/fstab as described in the aws knowledge center, this caused the server to hang at boot.

            Going forward we will also ensure we use UUID mounting so we are independent on the device naming in /dev/.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64591868

            QUESTION

            Openstack All-In-One local storage size
            Asked 2020-Oct-16 at 05:19

            after few deployment of openstack (packstack all-in-one) I founded that (from hypervisor summary) the local storage size is around 40G-50G. The disk storage that I deployed is actually around 150G and 250G but keep getting around 40-50G in openstack. The same behavior when I run over VM and baremetal. During OS(Centos7) installation I just using default auto setup...all storage size (sda) and never set manual. For example this is the VGS output from VM with 150G storage running openstack

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-16 at 05:19

            What do you mean by storage size? If you mean the amount of storage for Cinder volumes, adjust the CONFIG_CINDER_VOLUMES_SIZE parameter. The documentation isn't clear about it, but I think the number is in Gigabytes. However, this only works if your root filesystem has enough space.

            If you mean ephemeral storage, you also need to have a root filesystem that is large enough. I see that your system has three LVM volumes for root, swap and home. My suspicion is that your root volume (named centos-root) is too small. If that is the case, create a Centos installation that does not separate root and home and try again.

            Adding additional information to answer the below questions:

            The storage size reported in the hypervisor summary refers to the space available in Nova's instances directory, probably under /var/lib/nova (not sure). Which is on your root filesystem.

            Packstack uses an LVM volume group as the storage backend for Cinder. The physical volume for that volume group resides on a loop device /dev/loop1, which is a file that resides on the root filesystem. Therefore, Cinder's storage does take up space in your root filesystem. Use the command losetup -a to see that file.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64346319

            QUESTION

            Command 'vagrant' not found
            Asked 2020-Sep-30 at 22:54

            I am re-installing vagrant on my local machine unsuccessfully. Initially, I had vagrant downloaded, installed and running well, but decided to uninstall it. My uninstall was as follows:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Sep-30 at 22:54

            As you just removed the files instead of using apt-get or dpkg to uninstall the package, the package management is not aware of your manual removal, and so apt-get and dpkg still think the newest version is already installed, and so do nothing.

            apt-get --reinstall install vagrant

            should solve this.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64129477

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install lvm2

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/lvmteam/lvm2.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone lvmteam/lvm2

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:lvmteam/lvm2.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link