FakeItEasy | The easy mocking library for .NET | Mock library
kandi X-RAY | FakeItEasy Summary
kandi X-RAY | FakeItEasy Summary
A .NET dynamic fake library for creating all types of fake objects, mocks, stubs etc.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of FakeItEasy
FakeItEasy Key Features
FakeItEasy Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on FakeItEasy
QUESTION
I'm trying to fake a sealed external audio source using FakeItEasy.
I've wrapped the audio source and successfully faked the wrapper, so I know the basics are right. Here's the bit I'm currently stuck on:
The audio source returns isPlaying = true after it's been called with Play(). isPlaying will remain true until the audio clip has finished playing at which point it'll return to false.
I can fake the first part of this with the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-31 at 16:10Your solution would probably work if Play
were called more than once, since you're configuring what Play does (although I think you switched the true and false). I'm guessing from the question that Play
is only called once. In that case, you want Play to perform an action that will set up changing behaviour between calls to isPlaying.
Consider the approach in this passing test, where Play
causes isPlaying
to return true
exactly once (the default behaviour for an unconfigured bool-returning Fake's method is to return false
):
QUESTION
When attempting to supply a fake delegate for a method with an optional parameter in a faked object
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-23 at 05:36OK, I was able to reproduce your error message by defining ignored
as:
QUESTION
Using version 7.3.0 of FakeItEasy. In following code I am getting message that call to method GetById is not configured, yet I am configuring it. What I am doing wrong? There is no overload for the GetById method.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-08 at 19:19Updated after getting new code and stack trace. Original answer left below
I think it's a bug.
Boring explanation:
Strict
and Wrapping
each add rules to the front of the faked object's rules list. The rules apply to all incoming calls. The first rule found that matches a call is triggered. So in your configuration, Wrapping
is added making the Fake attempt to forward all calls to the wrapped object. Then Strict
, so now the Fake will reject all calls.
You'd then expect
QUESTION
I have the following appsettings.json configuration.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-11 at 12:19First, you should implement method that reads from file, which exists in the projects of unit test. So, if there is no file .json that you can read from you won;t be able to GetSection at all. So add file there then apply:
QUESTION
I have this block of code that I would like to test
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-21 at 21:14Is there a way to insure that the module object will be a fakeiteasy fake when I write my unit test?
No, it's not possible, at least not with the current shape of your code. FakeItEasy can't intercept instance creation using new
.
If you want to fake something, it has to be provided somehow to the system under test. The SUT can't create it itself.
I cannot provide a searchmodule instance as a parameter of the function
Search
, nor as a constructor parameter of the classSearchEngine
Could you inject a factory instead? Something like this:
QUESTION
I have looked quite a lot on the internet but somehow I am not grasping the concept to solve my problem. It should not be that complicated.
I have a SUT (System Under Test), which has an event action like:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-20 at 13:46According to my reading of the docs, if you're using a non-EventHandler
event, you need to use Raise.FreeForm.With
:
QUESTION
I'm trying to create a method that would allow a "method group" to be passed in. Basically this is for testing where I want to make sure that a method was called. FakeItEasy already allows for the following code
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Aug-10 at 10:04"Method group" is a concept that exists only in the language's syntax, there is no runtime type that corresponds to a method group.
Before I answer the question, you can just do this at callsite:
QUESTION
I'm using AutoFixture in my unit tests. The SUT is using AutoMapper. During execution of the unit test, I noticed that IMapper (interface of AutoMapper) was getting mocked by AutoFixture and thus disregarding any mapping profiles I have in my code.
So I wrote a customization to be able to pass in an IMapper instance so that AutoFixture will not mock this interface. But now it looks like that AutoFixture won't mock any other interfaces as well. This used to work before I introduced the AutoMapper customization.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-12 at 07:39AutoFixture can only build upon the testing framework only as much as it allows itself to be extended.
In xUnit 2 each provided DataAttribute
is considered, a distinct provider of arguments for the test, which is why they are isolated during runtime.
The recommended option here is to create a data attribute that will apply both AutoMoq and the AutoMapper customization.
You can achieve this by using a CompositeCustomization
and then using it in a custom AutoDataAttribute
implementation.
QUESTION
I am new to FakeItEasy and I am having a problem asserting if an async method has been called. It fails assertion because it hasn't been called. I have done my best to ensure the assertion matches the configured call but still no dice.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-02 at 23:08In your assertion, you create a new instance of CreateOwnerRequest
. Obviously, this isn't the same instance that is actually used in the controller action, so it isn't considered equal, and the assertion fail.
You could override Equals
on CreateOwnerRequest
so that they are considered equal, but it's probably not a good idea, since you would do it only in order to satisfy the assertion.
A better approach is to use argument constraints to specify a condition that the argument must match:
QUESTION
I'm new to FakeItEasy, sorry if the solution is obvious.
This is the simplified code which reproduces the problem:
I have a base class:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-30 at 12:33Your test is perfectly good, as far as it goes. If you run it, it'll tell you that ProtectedDo
was not called, which is accurate. Because Do_Override
is virtual, FakeItEasy intercepts the call. (The protectedness doesn't affect things in this case.)
If you don't want Do_Override
to be intercepted by FakeItEasy, you should configure the Fake to call the base method instead of handling the call itself:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install FakeItEasy
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page