cqrs-starter-kit | A starter kit for working with CQRS and intentful testing | Microservice library

 by   edumentab C# Version: Current License: BSD-3-Clause

kandi X-RAY | cqrs-starter-kit Summary

kandi X-RAY | cqrs-starter-kit Summary

cqrs-starter-kit is a C# library typically used in Architecture, Microservice applications. cqrs-starter-kit has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

A bunch of C# code to help you get started with writing intentful tests for a domain, expressing it as commands, events and exceptions. These ideas are often associated with the CQRS pattern.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              cqrs-starter-kit has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 430 star(s) with 132 fork(s). There are 71 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 1 open issues and 4 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 404 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of cqrs-starter-kit is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              cqrs-starter-kit has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              cqrs-starter-kit has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              cqrs-starter-kit code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              cqrs-starter-kit is licensed under the BSD-3-Clause License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              cqrs-starter-kit releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              cqrs-starter-kit saves you 76995 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 85505 lines of code, 0 functions and 146 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of cqrs-starter-kit
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            cqrs-starter-kit Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for cqrs-starter-kit.

            cqrs-starter-kit Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for cqrs-starter-kit.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            How to handle business rules in DDD + CQRS + Event Sourcing approach?
            Asked 2017-Jun-08 at 15:51

            I'm trying to figure out how to deal with complex domain model using CQRS/ES approach. Let's imagine we have e.g. Order domain entity, which handles both state and behavior of order. It has a Status property with transition rules for switching between statuses (implementing State pattern or any other kind of state machine). According to DDD principles, this logic should be implemented in Order class (representing the Order model) itself, having methods like approve(), cancel(), ship(), etc.

            Looking at different public examples of this kind architecture, it turns out that domain entity and aggregate root is the same, and it handles both the state and behavior and even its own projection from events. Isn't it a violation of SRP?

            But my question is more concrete: if I want to process new command (and apply new event), should I reconstitute entity from event stream (i.e. from write model and write db) and call its behavioral methods (which applies events to state) to handle business rules? Or just handle commands and events themselves, without having any write-model entity?

            Pseudocode to illustrate:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Jun-07 at 11:28
            TL;DR

            But my question is more concrete: if I want to process new command (and apply new event), should I reconstitute entity from event stream (i.e. from write model and write db) and call its behavioral methods (which applies events to state) to handle business rules?

            Yes.

            Or just handle commands and events themselves, without having any write-model entity?

            No.

            Once more, with feeling

            The command handler lives in the application component; the business model lives in the domain component.

            The motivation for keeping these components separated: making model replacement cost effective. What the domain experts care about, where the business gets its win, is the domain model. We don't expect to write the business model once and get it correct for all of time -- much more likely that we will learn more about how we want the model to work, and therefore be delivering improvements to the model on a regular basis. Therefore, its important that there not be a lot of drag to replace one version of the model with another -- we want the replacement to be easy; we want the amount of work required to make the change to be reflected in the business value we get.

            So we want the good stuff separated from "the plumbing".

            Keeping all of the business logic in the domain component gives you two easy wins; first, you don't ever have to guess about where the business logic lives -- whether the specifics of the use case are easy or hard, the business logic is going to be in the Order, not anywhere else. Second, because the business logic is not in the command handler, you don't have to worry about creating a bunch of test doubles to satisfy those dependency requirements -- you can test against the domain model directly.

            So, we use handlers to reconstitute entities and calling their business logic methods, NOT to handling business logic itself?

            Almost -- we use repositories to reconstitute entities and aggregates to handle the business logic. The role of the command handler is orchestration; it's the glue between the data model and the domain model.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44400402

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install cqrs-starter-kit

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            There is a Google Group where you can ask questions and discuss usage of the starter kit. Edument offers commercial support and training on Domain Driven Design, CQRS, and software architecture in general. Contact us for more details.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/edumentab/cqrs-starter-kit.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone edumentab/cqrs-starter-kit

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:edumentab/cqrs-starter-kit.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link