Draft | An etcd client library for .Net | Key Value Database library

$schema is only valid at the root, and properties values MUST be schemas.

You have a "$schema" : "#" inside properties. This means that you're trying to say that your JSON object should have a property called schema that can validate against the schema #. But # isn't a valid schema object, so the parse fails.

You need to remove the $schema from your properties.

I'd also suggest using a later draft of the schema spec (if you have control over the schema). Draft 6 is the oldest version that's compatible with the latest, 2020-12.

But for this you'll likely need to use a different validation package. There are several available. Mine is JsonSchema.Net.

You should split up the required clauses so they check one keyword at a time.

"required": ["bar", "baz"] will be false if neither 'bar' nor 'baz' are present, which is what you want, but it will also be false if one property is present and the other is not, which is not (because you then wrap that check with a "not", making the "if" condition true).

Therefore, change that check to:

It's strange that no one could answer this question. So I finally figured out how to make it by myself.

The solution is in the following link.

The primary reason was that mapbox plots things not based on its vector configuration. It renders things through its matrix as follows.

var m = new THREE.Matrix4().fromArray(matrix); var l = new THREE.Matrix4().makeTranslation(modelTransform.translateX, modelTransform.translateY, modelTransform.translateZ) .scale(new THREE.Vector3(modelTransform.scale, -modelTransform.scale, modelTransform.scale))

class s is a forward declaration. That is equivalent to

The problem with your sample lies in understanding what the trait is. And in fact it is not a type (that's why compiler asks for T: ?Sized), but a requirement for a type. Thus the solution is fairly simple: come up with a "real" type. You got it right with a struct declaration, it can be one option. But usually it's much more convenient to use associative type for that:

They appear to be using an implementation of the http signatures draft.

The linked document explains the way the signature needs to be calculated and how to verify it. But this is probably why your example doesn't work:

2.1.3. headers

OPTIONAL. The headers parameter is used to specify the list of HTTP headers included when generating the signature for the message.

Basically the signature doesn't include just the message, probably to prevent replay attacks. Since you just hash the message it is working as intended.

The error message explicitly tells you that the key that fails doesn't describe itself as suitable for encrypted storage or communications.

Per the signature subpacket specification, we know that this information lives in a subpacket of type 27.

Per the detailed specification on that subpacket, we know that the desired flags are 0x04 and 0x08, respectively.

To compare these keys, you can use gpg --list-packets --verbose.

For the first, non-working key, we get:

Posting Comments:

• I would tag Bootstap here for more responses.
• I would post a smaller more specific section of your html.

Possible Answer to Question:

• Instead of dropdown, try dropleft. I would also remove text-right from there as well unless you really want everything aligned right there.
  • https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.6/components/dropdowns/#dropleft
• If you still want it going right, outside of it's container, what iguypouf said in the comments is correct, remove overflow: hidden;.

Other Comments:

• I would separate the workCards from the col-md-4 so instead of ... it could be ...
• Consider replacing the you are using as the dropdown button with a element. This will be far better for accessibility. If you still want the styling to be like an tag, Bootstrap has the class .h1 that will work.
  • https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.6/content/typography/#headings
• With Bootstrap you could use instead of . Bootstrap has a ton of helpful helper classes.
  • https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.6/utilities/
• You might consider renaming text-right as it is already an existing Bootstrap class. Additionally, you won't need it anymore if you replace the with a (from the bullet point above.)
• I would replace tags with tags.
  • https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/strong#%3Cb%3E_vs._%3Cstrong%3E
• Everything from Organization Number: to Status: should probably be in it's own .
• The final row with the work button does not need two empty col-md-4. Instead you could one col-md-4 and add class justify-content-end to the parent row. You could get rid of that

  tag in there as well as it's not doing much.

  • https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.6/layout/grid/#horizontal-alignment

If need avoid remove original index use ignore_index=False in DataFrame.melt: