SimpleBenchmark | SimpleBenchmark是一个简单的 C

by liuhaoyang C# Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | SimpleBenchmark Summary

SimpleBenchmark is a C# library. SimpleBenchmark has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

SimpleBenchmark是一个简单的 C# 程序性能测试库，基于老赵CodeTimer的性能统计和分析，支持框架版本.NETFramework 4.5及以上。SimpleBenchmark的API参考BenchmarkDotNet（BenchmarkDotNet是一个功能强大的性能测试库，但BenchmarkDotNet仅支持.NETFramework 4.6和.NETCoreApp 1.1及以上，不支持.NETFramework 4.5_）。.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

SimpleBenchmark has a low active ecosystem.

It has 4 star(s) with 3 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 3 open issues and 0 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of SimpleBenchmark is current.

Quality

SimpleBenchmark has no bugs reported.

Security

SimpleBenchmark has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

SimpleBenchmark is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

SimpleBenchmark releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of SimpleBenchmark

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

SimpleBenchmark Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for SimpleBenchmark.

SimpleBenchmark Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for SimpleBenchmark.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on SimpleBenchmark

Vector taking less time to get populated than ArrayList

QUESTION

Vector taking less time to get populated than ArrayList

Asked 2018-Sep-17 at 14:12

I was going through the following article:

Understanding Collections and Thread Safety in Java

The article says:

You know, Vector and Hashtable are the two collections exist early in Java history, and they are designed for thread-safe from the start (if you have chance to look at their source code, you will see their methods are all synchronized!). However, they quickly expose poor performance in multi-threaded programs. As you may know, synchronization requires locks which always take time to monitor, and that reduces the performance.

[I've also done a benchmark using Caliper; please hear me out on this]

A sample code has also been provided:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Apr-25 at 05:33

The vector is expected to be slower in multithreaded environment. It is expected to be lightweight in your case. Better do the tests with adding these items from 10000 different threads

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43602273

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install SimpleBenchmark

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: