sponsoring | xaringan template | Data Visualization library

$i[10] is a syntax error, $m[n] means retrieving the array value of $m with the associated key n.

It should be like this:

Here is an idea based on this previous answer where I will add the margin factor to control the space between text and image:

Finally, was able to figure out why the error is thrown. Issue was not giving the actual jar and using wild card while running the test. It has to be blah/lib/core.jar not blah/lib/*. Hope this helps someone in the future.

I found the error. My test classes' name does not match *Test.kt pattern, but *Should.kt. When I changed their name to match *Test.kt, tests were found are everything started working.

I will accept this answer as the correct, however, if anybody knows how can I keep my test classes naming style and make it work, it will be appreciated.

You have to change

TL;DR: You can not (download all "whois" data).

(side preliminary note: "whois data", while often used is kind of incorrect. You use the whois protocol with a whois client to query a whois server at a registry, and more specifically here a domain name registry, that stores contact data about domain names it sponsors. For the same reason there is no "whois database".)

Now for the long sad story:

It is not possible for many obvious technical and non technical reasons. And you are deeply mistaken if you think the whois CLI command is simple (see my other answer here: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/407030/211833 for details on that point)

First your question makes no sense for all TLDs at once. You have at least to separate ccTLDs from gTLDs.

1) ccTLDs

ccTLDs have often stricter rules about privacy on personal data and this ought to be even stricter with ongoing European regulations such as GDPR. Basically some of them already forbid to have access to the complete list of domain names (which is often refered as the "zonefile") which has no personal data, so there is no way you will get access to all the content and the personal data. You may try to approach some and ask if there is anything possible like for research studies, but I doubt you will be successful and you will need to deal with each ccTLD registry separately as they each deal with their own content (all data on the domain names in the TLD they manage)

2) gTLDs

For them, the situation is quite different.

First, since things are by default more liberal (no protection of personal data), you will see that many registrars/companies provide proxy/privacy services which means that even in a whois query output you will not see much useful data.

But still due to GDPR and assimilated, things are changing. Do a whois on godaddy.com for example and watch all these stars for contact names and emails, and hence the need to go to a website.

However registrars and registries are under contract with ICANN. Which means they both have some requirements, and they are uniform.

First, all registries are mandated to give access to their zonefiles. It is often done throught the CZDA, for which you can find details on ICANN website. Note that it is in fact the list of all domain names publishes, not exactly the list of all domain names registered as you can register a domain name and not put it visible on the DNS.

As for the contact data, that is the rest of the information visible in whois, there are other points not wellknown. See the registrar agreement at https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en and specially section 3.3.6 that provide bulk acces to registrar "whois" data. Note how it is tied to some money (USD$10 000) and comes with various limitations on what you can do with it. Remember that you would need to do it per registrar, so in the gTLDs world that is more than 1000 of them.

There is no equivalent provisions in the registry agreements for public bulk access (see https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/agreements/agreement-approved-31jul17-en.html).

Things are complicated because as up today and for some months yet, .COM/.NET remains a thin registry that is one without the contact data stored at registry level, only at registrars.

Also all the above will change in the coming months/years because of the new regulations and also because RDAP, a new protocol, is slated to replace whois at one point. RDAP will allow far greater level of granularity on the access given and the amount of data returned.

Of course, in all cases above, nothing technically forbids anyone to just do regular whois queries and store the results locally. As you can see in a whois output your use of the data is constrained by various limits and bulk querying whois servers always expose you to the risk of being blacklisted or at least heavily rate limited. Note that for the input (which names to query the whois server for), it is easy to start with zonefiles, even cross TLDs (if site.example exists you can try also site.test even if you do not have .test zonefile), or search engines queries, or dictionaries, etc.

Multiple companies do that and provide tools to search their data, like to do reverse queries and things like that. Maybe some could deliver you bulk results, but certainly not for free.

Execute this natively without need a external gem. To call a bash function

Models:

The problem is in database design. In your table the set of ('kid_id','user_id') must be unique. But second (1,1) in your example is wrong because there is already a set of (1,1).

If you want to let the same user sponsor "the same kid multiple times" then your approach will not work. You can use a distinct primary key for maintaining this constraint. In this case, it should be something like,