distlock | universal component of distributed locks | Key Value Database library
kandi X-RAY | distlock Summary
kandi X-RAY | distlock Summary
The universal component of distributed locks in golang , support redis and postgresql
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- lockCtx blocks until the value is locked or the given context is canceled .
- newOptions creates new options object
- New returns a new Distlock .
- newLocker returns a new locker
- generateValue generates a random string
- NewRWMutex returns a new mutex
- Factor is an option to set the factor .
- Expiry returns an OptFunc that sets the expiry value .
- Prefix sets the prefix value .
- NewMutex returns a new Mutex
distlock Key Features
distlock Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on distlock
QUESTION
Is Redisson's getLock()
method good for a distributed use case, and how does it compare to getRedLock()
?
Redisson (3.11.x) has several methods to instantiate locks:
- RedissonClient.getLock()
- RedissonClient.getRedLock()
- others like
getReadWriteLock()
,getFairLock()
, etc.
What algorithm does getLock()
use, and is it safe for distributed usage? The documentation says:
Implements a non-fair locking so doesn't guarantees an acquire order by threads.
I am looking to compare getLock()
to getRedLock()
, which appears to use Redlock and is documented at the top-level of Redis' distlock
page: https://redis.io/topics/distlock:
...This page is an attempt to provide a more canonical algorithm to implement distributed locks with Redis. We propose an algorithm, called Redlock, which implements a DLM which we believe to be safer than the vanilla single instance approach.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-03 at 10:36Is Redisson's getLock() method good for a distributed use case, and how does it compare to getRedLock()?
All Redisson locks fit for distributed use case. RedLock algorithm assumes that you have lock per master node in cluster. RedLock algorithm is proposition and unfortunately there are no feedbacks of its practice usage. Except of its analisys https://martin.kleppmann.com/2016/02/08/how-to-do-distributed-locking.html
What algorithm does getLock() use, and is it safe for distributed usage?
RLock
object stored as single object in Redis. Other threads are notified through pubsub listeners if lock released. There is also lockWatchdogTimeout setting allows to define time after which lock will be forced to release if current thread is not alive.
UPDATE Since 3.12.5 version getLock() method returns Lock with improved reliability during failover. getRedLock() has been deprecated.
QUESTION
I read that Redis is single threaded and all commands are atomic. But there are also references talk about locks in Redis, e.g. https://redis.io/topics/distlock
It is not clear to me why Redis still need locks if it is single threaded. Can someone please explain?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-20 at 15:15No, Redis doesn't need locking.
Yes, Redis is single-threaded. The locks we are talking about here are not for Redis, but using Redis for a Distributed Lock.
The purpose of a distributed lock is to ensure that among several nodes that might try to do the same piece of work, only one actually does it (at least only one at a time). That work might be to write some data to a shared storage system, to perform some computation, to call some external API, or suchlike.
From: How to do distributed locking
These several nodes are workloads you have on other servers. You are using Redis kind-of as a RAM-shared-memory to implement the lock.
Redis is an excellent choice for a distributed lock because it gives you sub-millisecond latency as it is an in-memory database.
QUESTION
I need to connect to a single Redis instance from an application client.
Since the client will be replicated in Kubernetes, I'm studying Redis documentation about locks to prevent races between the client replicas.
After some googling and reading around, I zeroed in on these two resources:
- the
SETNX
command described here: https://redis.io/commands/setnx - the Redlock algorithm described here: https://redis.io/topics/distlock
Interestingly the SETNX
docs explicitly advise against using SETNX
to implement locks, stating that it has basically become obsolete:
The following pattern is discouraged in favor of the Redlock algorithm [...]
We document the old pattern anyway because certain existing implementations link to this page as a reference.
However the Redlock algorithm is specifically tailored for distributed locks, thus when one seeks to lock on multiple Redis instances - they actually refer to multiple masters.
To go a bit further, the library redsync (golang) declares the New
function as follows:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-13 at 23:59Yes, it's true that the Redlock algorithm is designed for a distributed Redis system, and that if you're using a single instance it should be fine to use the simpler locking methods described in the SET and SETNX documentation.
However, a more important point is this: you probably don't need to use locks to avoid conflicts between multiple Redis clients. Redis locks are usually used to secure some external distributed resource (see my answer here for a bit more on this). Within Redis itself locks are generally not necessary; thanks to Redis' single-threaded nature, many commands are already atomic, and you have the ability to use transactions or Lua scripts to compose arbitrarily complex atomic operations.
So my advice is to deisgn your client code to use atomicity to avoid conflict rather than trying to use a lock (distributed or otherwise).
QUESTION
We have been using Aeropsike exentsively as key-value store only. However now I couldn't find a way to actually save a lock in Aeropspike like the way we do in Redis.
I guess, I can always save native application lock as blobs, but that means I will be limited to a particular implementation in my application.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Apr-10 at 16:48Don't believe you can "save" locks in Aerospike. Any form of locking has to be implemented at the Application level and then you have to deal with the locking client abandoning the lock.
QUESTION
When trying to lock the hashkey as follow getting an exception:
I am referring the following docs:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-03 at 04:47Never mind, It was my mistake. I missed to prefix 'locks:' to the key.
If anyone struggling with issue, then can refer this, by the way in the documentation it has not been mentioned about prefix 'locks:' to key.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install distlock
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page