sense | Demo app that subscribes to Twitter | Websocket library

Well, it's indeed not possible that declarative way since we don't have hook for injecting to the reactive type in the middle on that level.

Try to look into a TransactionalOperator and its usage from the Java DSL's fluxTransform():

It varies between implementations, but generally, this is managed by the cache coherency protocol of the multiprocessor. In simplest terms, what happens is that when CPU1 writes to a memory location, that location will be invalidated in every other cache in the system. So that write will invalidate the line in CPU2's instruction cache as well as any (partially) decoded instructions in CPU2's uop cache (if it has such a thing). So when CPU2 goes to fetch/execute the next instruction, all those caches will miss and it will stall while things are refetched. Depending on the cache coherency protocol, that may involve waiting for the write to get to memory, or may fetch the modified data directly from CPU1's dcache, or things might go via some shared cache.

" It sounds as if rebasing "replays" commits, one after another (so sequentially) from the source branch over the changes in my working branch, is this the case? "

Yes.

" Furthermore, it does so, one develop commit at a time, until all the changes have been "replayed" into my feature branch, yes? "

No, it's the contrary. If you rebase your branch on origin/develop, all your branch's commits are to be replayed on top of origin/develop, not the other way around.

Finally, the difference between merge and rebase scenarios has been described in details everywhere, including on this site, but very broadly the merge workflow will add a merge commit to history. For that last part, take a look here for a start.

It's not possible to create an instance of a class from a Type object representing the class.

For more information check out this link: Flutter - How to instantiate an object from a Type

Maybe this is simpler?

Some issues in your code (as it was first posted):

• return skipper(prev,curr) is going to exit the loop, but there might be more nodes to be removed further down the list. skipper only takes care of a sub sequence consisting of the same value, but it will not look beyond that. The list is not necessarily sorted, so the occurrences of the value are not necessarily grouped together.

• Be aware that the variable prev in skipper is not the same variable as the other, outer prev. So the assignment prev=curr in skipper is quite useless

• Unless the list starts with the searched value, dummy.next will always remain None, which is what the function returns. You should initialise dummy so it links to head as its next node. In your updated code you took care of this, but it is done in an obscure way (in the else part). dummy should just be initialised as the head of the whole list, so it is like any other node.

In your updated code, there some other problems as well:

• while prev.next: risks to be an infinite loop, because it continues while prev is not the very last node, but it also doesn't move forward in that list if its value is not equal to the searched value.

I would suggest doing this without the skipper function. Your main loop can just deal with the cases where current.val == val, one by one.

Here is the corrected code:

OK, so the real problem here is that you are using Java terminology incorrectly.

There are no member classes of the Manager class. Yup. That's what I said!

A "member class" is a class that is declared inside another class. But there aren't any classes declared inside Manager.

However, there are fields ("member fields") declared inside Manager; i.e. classA, classB and so on. And these fields have classes; i.e. ClassA, ClassB and so on.

If you want to find the member fields of a class, use the Class.getDeclaredFields() method. This will give you an array of Field objects.

You can then get each field's class by calling Field.getType() on it. Then you can use reflection to lookup the classses printResult() method and invoke it on the value in the respective fields of a target object.

Notes:

1. The Class returned by getType() could denote a primitive type or array type rather than a class. This Class will represent the erased type of the field.

2. If you want the Type as it was declared in the source code, use Field.getGenericType() instead.

I wouldn't recommend you to use float since it has a strange behaviour sometimes. I would rather use flexboxes to achieve the layout.

1. Create the HTML Structure:

You can write only one function to update user infor like this: