xyzw | Vector Matrix Quaternion Euler Angles SLERPs | Math library

Can you try to add port=443 as in one of the examples from the doc you mentioned https://elasticsearch-py.readthedocs.io/en/v7.16.3/#tls-ssl-and-authentication ?

While AD has a userPassword attribute, it's just a pointer to the unicodePwd attribute, which is the real password attribute. But userPassword doesn't always work, as described in the documentation. For Active Directory, you're better off using unicodePwd directly.

The documentation for unicodePwd says that you require either SSL or SASL encryption to set the attribute. SASL would usually be done with Kerberos. If you were using DirectoryEntry, that's easily done by specifying AuthenticationTypes.Sealing. With Novell.Directory.Ldap, I don't know if that's possible, and this open issue suggests that it isn't (yet).

Unless you're willing to switch to using Sytem.DirectoryServices (which, in .NET Core, would lock you into running your app on Windows only), then I think you are stuck requiring SSL.

The unicodePwd attribute also requires a very specific format. The documentation says:

the DC requires that the password value be specified in a UTF-16 encoded Unicode string containing the password surrounded by quotation marks, which has been BER-encoded as an octet string per the Object(Replica-Link) syntax.

In C#, that's easily done like this:

You can use the accumulator Prolog programming pattern
to solve the problem. I am now assuming that you have the
input xyzw in the form of a list [x,y,z,w]. The accumulator

is the second argument of the predicate links/3:

std::array has a layout specified by the standard, but std::tuple does not, and can be anything the implementation wants.

So it's expected that they may differ, but of course they may also happen to choose the same layout, on some compilers/versions/platforms - there's just no guarantee.

In practice one of the easiest ways to implement std::tuple is recursively, as it was originally done in the Loki library. This will lay the fields out in reverse order (the most-base class, whose subobject comes first, is the leaf for the last member of the typelist). That's not the only possible implementation though, and I have observed the field order differing between compilers/standard library implementations.

NB. as mentioned in a comment, your current diagnostic has UB - however, you can hexdump the 4 bytes at reinterpret_cast(&i.z) safely and get an equivalent result.

einsum is actually a product of its inputs. It's only a sum over the indexes that do not occur in the output.

So,

tokenization function can be compared to an hashing function which takes as input the media and outputs the token

This is an incorrect assumption.

You can compare an NFT collection (at least per the most widely used standard - ERC-721) to a key-value dictionary, where the key is an integer ID, and the value is a URL. The standard defines that the URL should lead to a JSON containing the token name, description, and image URL.

But there's no hashing function that would calculate the token parameters based on the image.

Each collection (holding several NFTs) is a smart contract deployed on a different address (e.g. 0x12345). Also, each NFT within its collection has a unique ID (e.g. 1).

Combination of the collection address and the token ID can be used as a unique identificator of each NFT (e.g. 0x12345 / 1).

It's technically possible for multiple different NFTs (no matter whether they're in the same or different collections) to lead to very similar images or even the same image. But the combination of collection address and token ID is always unique.

Nice description of usage of equation rotation about axis set as quaterion can be found here:
http://wiki.alioth.net/index.php/Quaternion

quote

You may want to make a copy of the byte before printing it:

here you can find examples on how to join collections (and self joins further down the page).

In your particular case the query could look something like this: