specifications | openEHR specifications

Your issue is value capturing in lambda expressions.

The value of field WSUserJoinedToRoom is changed every time when receiving the last item so when the main thread frame playes it will execute both lambda actions which will both access the same WSUserJoinedToRoom value.

So in your case

• player 3 is received and stored into WSUserJoinedToRoom and you add the callback action
• player 1 is received and stored into WSUserJoinedToRoom and you add the callback action
• now the main thread executed Update and executes both actions which do read the user_id and user_name from the current WSUserJoinedToRoom (player 1), not the one it was when the callback was Enqueued!

Instead either store the two strings in local variables before:

There is an overview here on the DevHub

And there are examples throughout substrate that include tests.rs and mock.rs files to use as reference.

If you have not already, checkout the create a pallet tutorial and the recipes all have some tasty examples to look at for these as well.

Raster or bitmap fonts are represented in a number of different ways and there are bitmap font file standards that have been developed for both Linux and Windows. However raw data representation of bitmap fonts in programming language source code seems to vary depending on:

• the memory architecture of the target computer,
• the architecture and communication pathways to the display controller,
• character glyph height and width in pixels and
• the amount of memory for bitmap storage and what measures are taken to make that as small as possible.

A brief overview of bitmap fonts

A generic bitmap is a block of data in which individual bits are used to indicate a state of either on or off. One use of a bitmap is to store image data. Character glyphs can be created and stored as a collection of images, one for each character in the character set, so using a bitmap to encode and store each character image is a natural fit.

Bitmap fonts are bitmaps used to indicate how to display or print characters by turning on or off pixels or printing or not printing dots on a page. See Wikipedia Bitmap fonts

A bitmap font is one that stores each glyph as an array of pixels (that is, a bitmap). It is less commonly known as a raster font or a pixel font. Bitmap fonts are simply collections of raster images of glyphs. For each variant of the font, there is a complete set of glyph images, with each set containing an image for each character. For example, if a font has three sizes, and any combination of bold and italic, then there must be 12 complete sets of images.

A brief history of using bitmap fonts

The earliest user interface terminals such as teletype terminals used dot matrix printer mechanisms to print on rolls of paper. With the development of Cathode Ray Tube terminals bitmap fonts were readily transferable to that technology as dots of luminescence turned on and off by a scanning electron gun.

Earliest bitmap fonts were of a fixed height and width with the bitmap acting as a kind of stamp or pattern to print characters on the output medium, paper or display tube, with a fixed line height and a fixed line width such as the 80 columns and 24 lines of the DEC VT-100 terminal.

With increasing processing power, a more sophisticated typographical approach became available with vector fonts used to improve displayed text quality and provide improved scaling while also reducing memory required to describe the character glyphs.

In addition, while a matrix of dots or pixels worked fairly well for languages such as English, written languages with complex glyph forms were poorly served by bitmap fonts.

Representation of bitmap fonts in source code

There are a number of bitmap font file formats which provide a way to represent a bitmap font in a device independent description. For an example see Wikipedia topic - Glyph Bitmap Distribution Format

The Glyph Bitmap Distribution Format (BDF) by Adobe is a file format for storing bitmap fonts. The content takes the form of a text file intended to be human- and computer-readable. BDF is typically used in Unix X Window environments. It has largely been replaced by the PCF font format which is somewhat more efficient, and by scalable fonts such as OpenType and TrueType fonts.

Other bitmap standards such as XBM, Wikipedia topic - X BitMap, or XPM, Wikipedia topic - X PixMap, are source code components that describe bitmaps however many of these are not meant for bitmap fonts specifically but rather other graphical images such as icons, cursors, etc.

As bitmap fonts are an older format many times bitmap fonts are wrapped within another font standard such as TrueType in order to be compatible with the standard font subsystems of modern operating systems such as Linux and Windows.

However embedded systems that are running on the bare metal or using an RTOS will normally need the raw bitmap character image data in the form similar to the XBM format. See Encyclopedia of Graphics File Formats which has this example:

Following is an example of a 16x16 bitmap stored using both its X10 and X11 variations. Note that each array contains exactly the same data, but is stored using different data word types:

For such task you need Recursive CTE which is not supported by EF any version. I have proposed usage of extension linq2db.EntityFrameworkCore which can bring such functionality into existing EF Core projects.

(V8 developer here.)

Both the ECMAScript standard itself and engines' implementations of it evolve by adding individual features one by one.

The "TC39" committee discusses new proposed features. Once a feature has been agreed upon, it is added to the standard (see the "Process" document @Bergi linked in his comment for more details). The yearly "releases" of ECMAScript are just snapshots of this continuous process.

Engines typically implement a new feature either shortly before it is finalized (so that implementation feedback can inform the standardization discussion) or shortly after.

Rewriting an entire JavaScript engine from scratch every year would be a huge waste of effort: most of the language doesn't change. Also, rewriting an entire JavaScript engine from scratch would take many years. (In fact, rewriting any software from scratch is almost always a bad idea, because you'll spend a huge amount of time just catching up with what the old version was able to do. Incremental improvements are almost always the better strategy.)

The majority of engine developers' time is typically spent on improving support for existing features and subsystems (compilers, garbage collectors, internal object model, ...), such as making them faster or more memory efficient.

Splitting by comma, is the right way, you just need to store the the array returned from the split function into an ArrayList or an array of Strings array, like this:

Unfortunately, the Swagger file for the Admin API is not yet available. That's also why DocuSign doesn't yet have SDKs for the API yet. I don't have access to any scheduling information on it.

I suggest that you handle any Admin API calls you need to do manually for now.

What language are you creating SDKs for with CodeGen? (Please answer in a comment or by editing your original question.)

First, reproducibility with random data needs a seed. I started using set.seed(42), but that generated negative values which caused completely unrelated warnings. Being a little lazy, I changed the seed to set.seed(2021), finding all positives.

For #1, we can add limits=, where the help for ?scale_y_continuous says that