episodes | Real User Measurement performance timing library | Performance Testing library

I am trying to strip away do notation in the Database.sh file from https://haskell-at-work.com/episodes/2018-01-19-domain-modelling-with-haskell-data-structures.html

But I am having an Error and I have no Idea why. (Probably just means I don't know about Haskell)

This is a continuation of Haskell Passing from do notation to Applicative

I am trying to strip away do notation in the Database.sh file from https://haskell-at-work.com/episodes/2018-01-19-domain-modelling-with-haskell-data-structures.html

But I am having an Error and I have no Idea why. (Probably just means I don't know about Haskell)

I'm trying to build a website for tv series using Django framework, I put in the models.py all kinds of details about that show and a JSONField to define the number seasons and episodes in each season.
Example: { "s1" : 15 , "s2" : 25 , "s3" : 23}

I made a dropdown in the template where the series is playing so the user can select the episode the problem starts when I try to access the values of the keys in the JSON object passed. I tried that:

I have to setup a Novel setup means I have to show episodes of every related novel on its click.

I would like to create a regex expression that matches all possible episode numbering formats from a tv show file format.

I currently have this regex which matches most but not all of the list of examples.

Sample data

I totally lost on this. I am using time-use data I would like to extract episodes based on time steps. So basically, individuals are asked to take 3 measurements at the same time denoted by 3 variables a_1, b_1 and c_1. In some cases, they reported the same measurement at a_2, b_2 and c_2. I would like to extract the length (the minimum length is 2) of the same measurements based on time-steps the frequency of the occurrence as well the start and end times.

For example, below the highlighted red and blue cells denote same measurement based on time-steps and not per id.

Possible output:

I'm learning ReactJS and Javascript, and I've occurred this problem, I don't know why it acts like that, but I think I know that my function is rendering too many times by setting the State for setEpisodeList over and over again I guess, how do I resolve this in my code?

The info state contains an episodes object that has an array type.

I have over 1000 episodes in 1 array, so I want to split that 1 big episodes array that contains over 1000 episodes into smaller chunks, each chunk will be an array that contains 10 episodes in it, that's why I'm using episodeListChunk.push(info.episodes.splice(0, 10)).

So it'll become

Is it possible to separate out the feature of an RTK-based application that depend on different slices of a the redux store into separate node packages? Assuming so, what is the best way to do that?

We have a large, and growing, app that is based around Redux Toolkit. Where possible we try to separate parts of the application into their own node packages. We find there are a lot of benefits to doing this, including:

• Maintainability of codebase
• Fine-grained control over intra-application dependencies
• Testability

It's easy enough to do this for cross-cutting things, like logging, http requests, routing, etc. But we would like to go further and modularize the "features" of our app. For example, have the "address book" feature of our application live in a different module than, say, the "messages" feature, with them all composed together via an "app" package.

The benefits we see here are ones we have found in other codebases and have been discussed in other places. (E.g., here for iOS). But, in brief: (1) you can see and control intra-app dependencies. For example, you can easily see if the "messages" feature depends on the "address book" feature and make explicit decisions about how you will expose the one feature to the other via what you export; (2) you can build fully testable sub-parts of the app by simply having a "preview" package that only composes in the things you want to test, e.g., you could have a "contact app" package that only depends on the "contact" feature for building and testing just that; (3) you can speed up CI/CD times by not needing to compile (TS/babel), pack/minify, and unit test every part; (4) you can utilize various analytics tools to get more fine-grained pictures of how each feature is developing.

There may well be other ways to achieve these things, and some may disagree with the premise that this is a good way to do it. That's not the focus of the question, but I'm open to the possibility it may be the best answer (e.g., some one with significant Redux experience may explain why this is a bad idea).

We've struggled to come up with a good way to do this with Redux Toolkit. The problem seems to boil down to -- is there a good way to modularize (via separate node packages) the various "slices" used in RTK? (This may apply to other Redux implementations but we are heavily invested in RTK).

It's easy enough to have a package that exports the various items that will be used by the redux store, i.e., the slice state, action creators, async thunks, and selectors. And RTK will then compose those very nicely in the higher-level app. In other words, you can easily have an "app" package that holds the store, and then a "contacts" package that exports the "contacts" slice, with its attendant actions, thunks, selectors, etc.

The problem comes if you also want the components and hooks that use that portion of slice to live in the same package as the slice, e.g., in the "contacts" package. Those components/hooks will need access to the global dispatch and the global useSelector hook to really work, but that only exists in the "app" component, i.e., the feature that composes together the various feature packages.

1. We could export the global dispatch and useSelector from the "higher" level "app" package, but then our sub-components now depend on the higher level packages. That means we can no longer build alternate higher level packages that compose different arrangements of sub packages.

2. We could use separate stores. This has been discussed in the past regarding Redux and has been discouraged, although there is some suggestion it might be OK if you are trying to achieve modularization. These discussions are also somewhat old.

Is it possible to separate out the feature of an RTK-based application that depend on different slices of a the redux store into separate node packages? Assuming so, what is the best way to do that?

While I'm primarily interested if if/how this can be done in RTK, I'd also be interested in answers--especially from folks with experience with RTK/redux on large apps--as to whether this is Bad Idea and what other approaches are taken to achieve the benefits of modularization.