dox | JavaScript documentation generator for node | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | dox Summary
kandi X-RAY | dox Summary
JavaScript documentation generator for node using markdown and jsdoc
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of dox
dox Key Features
dox Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on dox
QUESTION
I have a BeagleBone Black board and I'm using the below-mentioned image file. https://debian.beagleboard.org/images/bone-debian-10.3-iot-armhf-2020-04-06-4gb.img.xz
I aim to operate GPIO pins of this board with the c programming language.
To do so, I've gone through this link: https://beagleboard.org/static/librobotcontrol/installation.html
And after following all the steps according to this link the result I achieved is the same as mentioned in the checking functionality step [the last step] of this document.
Furthermore, I follow this document for c language setup: https://github.com/beagleboard/librobotcontrol/blob/master/docs/src/project_template.dox
and run this source code: https://beagleboard.org/static/librobotcontrol/rc_test_leds_8c-example.html
All these processes were completed without any error.
################################## Now I want to access the GPIO pins of the board. For that, I've prepared a basic code.
Let's take a pin P8_10 / GPIO2[4] for an example. So for that my code will be:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-08 at 02:22Try config-pin gpio
QUESTION
I have made a discord bot which uses multiprocessing (it is my first time using multiprocessing) in order to improve efficiency. The bot already works fine without it, i was just bored and wanted to improve it. This bot is for a school's discord server which just gets the lunch for the day using their api (idek why they have one).
For some reason my multiprocessing is forcing my code to run 5 times, and somehow is causing my discord bot to send 5x the messages than it should. I honestly have no idea what's happening with this. I run the function before anything to do with my bot and somehow it makes 5 bots run concurrently with the same token. It takes about 30s for all 5 bots to come online, which they do one by one. One more minor thing is that the multiprocessing prints "none" 5 times for no reason every time the func is called.
Thanks you for taking your time to ready my thread!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 23:38The documentation in the multiprocessing
module is quite clear about that. When you run a module with multiprocessing, that launches a brand new process, with a brand new interpreter, which has to import your main module and all the modules it needs. If you don't have your one-time-only code in an if __name__=='__main__':
block, like the documentation suggests, then it will get re-run in every process that launches.
This is why you should get in the habit of putting your app's main code in an def main():
and doing
QUESTION
Suppose there is an event model and for each event there is one client and one consultant. Also, one consultant can have multiple events. Each event has number of different documents. I am trying to display list of events when a consultant logs in and in that list od events it should display their respective documents.
Models.py:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-16 at 11:39You can simply loop over the related Document
objects from the Event
object itself by using document_set
(the default related_name
for Document
i.e. the model name in lowercase with _set
appended). Also you can optimise the number of queries made by using prefetch_related
[Django docs]:
In your view:
QUESTION
I need to have standard deviation of a vector in Eigen library. I have not found it. So i tried it:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-26 at 11:32An Eigen::VectorXd
is defined as typedef Matrix VectorXd;
so it is a special form of an Eigen::Matrix
. You are trying to subtract a scalar ys.mean()
from a vector ys
which is an coefficient-wise operation. The Eigen::Matrix
class is not intended to be used with coefficient-wise operations but for linear algebra. For performing coefficient-wise operations Eigen has the Eigen::Array
class.
Therefore it is sufficient to convert your Eigen::Matrix
ys
to an Eigen::Array
for your formula to work:
QUESTION
How to use doxygen to produce a pdf with custom latex stylesheet and commands ?
I need to document this code :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-21 at 08:52When I understand it correct you want to use the LaTeX command \mytable
in your LaTeX output / resulting pdf.
Most steps done are correct thought the problem is that \mytable
is a LaTeX command and not a doxygen command, so you have to make it known in the doxygen parsed comment.
For this there are a few possibilities:
- the
\latexonly ... \endlatexonly
i.e. in the comment add:
QUESTION
I'm searching for a way to solve a system of linear equations. Specifically 8 equations with a total of 16 unknown values.
Each unknown value (w[0...15]) is a 32-bit binary value which corresponds to 4 ascii characters written over 8 bits. For example:
For :
I've tried writing this system of linear equations as a single matrix equation. Which gives:
Right now, using the Eigen linear algebra library, I get my 16 solutions (w[0...15]) but all of them are either decimal or null values, which is not what I need. All 16 solutions need to be the equivalent of 4 hexadecimal characters under their binary representation. Meaning integers between 48 and 56 (ascii for '0' to '9'), 65 and 90 (ascii for 'A' to 'Z'), or 97 and 122 (ascii for 'a' to 'z').
Current 16 solutions:
I've found a solution to this problem using something called box-constraints. An example is shown here using python's lsq_linear function which allows the user to specify bounds. It seems Eigen does not let the user specify bounds in its decomposition methods.
Therefore, my question is, how do you get a similar result in C++ using a linear algebra library? Or is there a better way to solve such systems of equations without writing it under a single matrix equation?
Thanks in advance.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-02 at 17:50If you have more unknowns than equations for sure your system will be indeterminate, the rank of a 8 x 16 matrix is at most 8, thus you have at least 16 degrees of freedom.
Further more if you have bounds to your variables i.e. mixed equalities and inequalities, then your problem is better posed as a linear programming. You can set a dummy objective function c[i] = 0
, you could use GLPK but that is a very generic solution. If you want a small code snipped you probably can find a toy implementation of the Simplex method that will satisfy your needs.
QUESTION
I'm trying to port a working Armadillo function to Eigen and am having an issue with RcppEigen
vector and matrix subsetting.
Here's my function:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 19:09I may be reading the Eigen documentation differently: I do not think you can 'pick' elements from a matrix or vector by injecting an integer vector. If it did as you do above with nz
then the simpler below would compile. But it doesn't. Meaning your very clever and very highly aggregate 'update' expression does not work.
QUESTION
Apologies, I hate to ask something so simple, but I've failed to find an answer, probably because I don't know how to describe the question concisely.
Say you have a class X
, and want to use it in z.cc
.
- I know you should include
x.h
inz.cc
if you wish to have a field or param of typeX
so that the compiler knows how much space the field or param will require. - I know you should forward declare
class X
if you wish to have a field or param of typeX*
so that the compiler is clear that the class will be declared, but doesn't need to know how much spaceX
requires. - But what about if you wish to invoke a method
X::doX()
? Does this require an include, forward declaration, or neither? I have my IDE telling meUnused "#include "x.h""
in this situation.
E.g.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-23 at 17:00Should you include files when invoking methods declared in it?
Yes.
But what about if you wish to invoke a method X::doX()? Does this require an include, forward declaration, or neither?
Definition of the class is required to call member functions of the class.
Automatic type deduction can easily hide the types that we depend on. If we were to rewrite:
QUESTION
I am trying to make a custom Vector3 inheriting from Eigen's vector 3 like so.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-20 at 20:35You need to use an extra pair of parenthesis. Also there is no point in templating this constructor since the template argument type needs to match the scalar type of the Eigen vector and if you'd like the scalar type to be configurable you'd need to template the whole class.
In summary
QUESTION
For all intents and purposes, I have a bunch of functions and function calls with this sort of AST structure. It's an array of functions.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-10 at 19:28There are a few issues I can see:
- I don't see any reference syntax in your code, since I don't see any "&"s. The only thing you have are moves. If you start to break away from that syntax, it begins to ruin things.
- You're also using both
"reference"
and"borrow"
in your javascript, which is confusing, because they mean the same thing in Rust. - You don't have a type for
doX
's parameters, which means you can't handle that variable properly, because it could be a move, which could cause scope problems for the calling function. - How did
b
become a reference tox
?
Rust / Understanding Ownership:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch04-00-understanding-ownership.html
Here's a synopsis of the above link:
For all of this, when I say "variable," I mean "variable that uses the heap." Also, feel free to substitute/interpret "reference" as "borrow."
A variable gets dropped at the end of its scope, if it is still valid. Dropping means freeing the memory. Scope is from when the variable is introduced to the last time it's used. If there are any references to this variable that are still in scope, it's an error.
By default, variables are moved instead of copied.
When a variable is copied, a new, unique variable is created and the data is copied. This creates an entirely new, independent variable.
When a variable is moved to another variable, the initial variable is marked invalid and can no longer be used. (A big tradeoff of this style of memory management.) The new variable points to the same heap data that the old variable did. If the initial variable is used after being marked invalid, it's an error.
A variable can be moved by assigning it to another variable in one of three ways:
- directly. e.g. x = y
- by setting the value of a function parameter. e.g. f(x)
- by returning it from a function, e.g. x = f()
If you pass a variable to another function and want to continue using it after that call, then the function has to "give it back" by returning it (another major deviation from expectations). This is just (2) followed by (3), e.g. x = f(x).
It's possible to create two types of references to a variable: immutable (default) and mutable. A reference just points to the variable instead of the data.
You can have an unlimited number of immutable references to a variable. You can only have one mutable reference, and only if you have no other types of references (including immutable) in scope.
When references are out of scope, they do not call drop. It's an error for references to continue to exist when the variable to which they point has been dropped.
If I were to implement this, I would do the following in order:
- get scope working. This is the time from when a variable or reference is first introduced to the time it is last used. Note that scopes in the same block may or may not overlap.
- get copy working
- get move working, including the drop aspect. detect scope extending beyond validity. Do this in stages, for move types (1), (2), (3) as shown above.
- get immutable reference working, error if attempt to change variable, error if scope beyond validity.
- get mutable reference working, error if any other reference in scope, error if scope is beyond validity.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install dox
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page