demo | Examples using Greenter ( UBL

Go to credential Manager -> Windown Credential -> Add a generic credential fill up the fields Network address: git:https://bitbucket.org Username: App Password: Solver from Here

Known bug on the Apache Kafka side. Nothing to do from Spring perspective. See more info here: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-kafka/discussions/2027. And here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13391

You need to wait until Apache Kafka 3.0.1 or don't use embedded Kafka and just rely on the Testcontainers, for example, or fully external Apache Kafka broker.

PEP 660 – Editable installs for pyproject.toml based builds defines how to build projects that only use pyproject.toml. Build tools must implement PEP 660 for editable installs to work. You need a front-end (such as pip ≥ 21.3), backend. The statuses of some popular backends are:

• Setuptools does not yet implement PEP 660.
• Flit implements PEP 660 as of version 3.4.
• Poetry implements PEP 660 as of version 1.08.

Apple developer Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple answered this question here:

This is not an error per se. Rather, it’s the Objective-C runtime telling you that:

• Two frameworks within your process implement the same class (well, in this case classes, namely _PathPoint and _PointQueue).
• The runtime will use one of them, choosing it in an unspecified way.

This can be bad but in this case it’s not. Both of the implementations are coming from the system (well, the simulated system) and thus you’d expect them to be in sync and thus it doesn’t matter which one the runtime uses.

So, in this specific case, these log messages are just log noise.

From the C18 standard in 6.7.2.2:

Each enumerated type shall be compatible with char, a signed integer type, or an unsigned integer type. The choice of type is implementation-defined, but shall be capable of representing the values of all the members of the enumeration.

So yes enum { a } e = 1; is valid. e is a 'integer' type so it can take the value 1. The fact that 1 is not present as an enumeration value is no issue. The enumeration members only give handy identifiers for some of possible values.

This is CWG 507. An example similar to yours was given, and the submitter explained that according to the standard, the overload resolution is ambiguous, even though this result is very counter-intuitive.

Translating to your particular example, when comparing operator==(int, int) and operator==(float, int) to determine which is the better candidate, we have to determine which one has the better implicit conversion sequence for the first argument (obviously in the second argument, no conversion is required). For the first argument of operator==(int, int), we just use A::operator int. For the first argument of operator==(float, int), there is no way to decide whether to use A::operator int or A::operator char, so we get the "ambiguous conversion sequence". The overload resolution rules say that the ambiguous conversion sequence is no better or worse than any other user-defined conversion sequence. Therefore, the straightforward conversion from A{} to int (via A::operator int) is not considered better than the ambiguous conversion from A{} to float. This means neither operator== candidate is better than the other.

Clang is apparently following the letter of the standard whereas GCC and MSVC are probably doing something else because of the standard seeming to be broken here. "Which compiler is right" depends on your opinion about what the standard should say. There is no proposed resolution on the issues page.

I would suggest removing operator char unless you really, really need it, in which case you will have to think about what else you're willing to give up.

Unfortunately, you cannot chant the height of a dropdown list (while using ). It is confirmed here. you can build it yourself using divs & v-for (assuming you get the list from an outsource) and then you can style it as you wish. apologies for barring bad news.

Flutter change mouse scroll behavior after 2.5. See this for detail.

Which compiler is right here?

Invoking a consteval constructor with new is ill-formed.
MSVC and GCC are right to reject it; clang is wrong as a diagnostic is required.