w3 | a weechat wrapper to write sparse config files

My question is, is it correct to specifiy multiple XSD file implementing the same namespace with different xsd structures ?

Yes, that is a valid use of XML schema. A schema does not have to be represented by a single XSD file. Please see https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#SchemaInMultDocs and https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/#import

You may also find this thread helpful: What's the difference between xsd:include and xsd:import?

I don't quite understand which data you want to have in each line, the following templates creates a line using for-each-pair on each pair of fn:number elements in the two fn:array children of the fn:map with the @key being result-sheet:

It's hard to tell from what you posted why you are getting an error, so I can only add some information that can hopefully allow you to troubleshoot the issue.

Your message has WS-Addressing headers, being one of them. The value of this field should be specified in the WSDL if your WSDL also includes WS-Addressing Metadata information, or should be specified in the documentation of the web service you are invoking. Your error message "XML Request is not well formed, Action does not exist" seems to indicate that there might be an issue with this field, but there is another action that SOAP services have which is a SOAP action. I asked about it in the comment above to make sure it's eliminated as a source of problems. In SOAP 1.1 it's called SOAPAction and is a separate HTTP header, while in SOAP 1.2 it's an action parameter on the HTTP Content-Type header. Based on the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope namespace, you have a SOAP 1.2 message.

With these explanations layed out, I suggest you take the WSDL and feed it to SoapUI who can generate sample requests that you can use to invoke the web service. If the WSDL also contains WS-Addressing Metadata, SoapUI should be able to pick it up and help you fill in the values you need. If not, look again through the WSDL for Action elements (make sure you differentiate between the SOAP Action and the WS-Addressing Action using their XML namespaces) or through the service documentation.

Once you get a succesfull call using SoapUI, then try to duplicate it with your code. At that point you can again use SoapUI to troubleshoot things and inspect your code built message to see it resembles the one you can successfully send with SoapUI.

Hope this helps get you closer to a resolution.

Can you try this?

In your template you're calling your method editData(item) and you're passing variable item as your parameter. But in your template there is no such thing defined - I assume (without looking at the rest of your code) that you wanted to write editData(forecast) instead. This will pass the forecast variable defined in your *ngFor directive.

Let's revamp the sequences and try the scenarios.

Perform the following changes to extract the correct error message from the response and to validate in the Filter

• Update the property mediator in the out-sequence as following to specify the path up to the leaf node to extract the error message

What would a keyboard user who doesn't use Assistive Tech do?

I personally think this is just poorly worded and is trying to say that it offers an alternative way to navigate for Assistive Tech that doesn't intrude on normal operations (as screen reader users for example rarely use Tab and are more likely to navigate my sections or headings and then by links...which would catch skip links obviously).

If all else fails or advice seems to conflict, you should always follow advice in WCAG over WAI-ARIA spec anyway and WCAG is pretty clear that skip links are a level A requirement.

And if you still aren't sure - go user experience over guidance and compliance every time!

Skip links offer a much better user experience to keyboard only users without assistive tech and have very little impact on screen reader users so use them.

As a final note on this - it is 2021 - unless you are supporting IE8 or older (and even I don't advocate for that sort of madness!) you shouldn't need role="main" and instead just use a element.

You are using scalatest version 2.2.6:

Would something like this work for you:

XSLT 2.0