restless | A lightweight REST miniframework for Python | REST library

Functional components don't have a defined this, and any state should be declared in a useState hook.

Use the useState hook and set initial state.

You are using a functional component. There is not this.state, isn't it?

You should use useState. I updated the codesandbox for you: https://codesandbox.io/s/zealous-noether-3tz4f?file=/src/App.js

You have defined Content inside EditUser component which we never do with React Components, because in this situtaion, Content will be re-created every time the EditUser is re-rendered. (surely, EditUser is going to be re-rendered few/many times).

So, a re-created Content component means the old Content will be destroyed (unmounted) and the new Content will be mounted.

That's why it is be being mounted many times and hence resetting the state values to initial values.

So, the solution is to just define it (Content) outside - not inside any other react component.

I am trying to run the producer-consumer problem while using pthread_cond_signal() instead of pthread_cond_broadcast(), however, I attempted a lot of things and can't seem to do it (if I choose n producers and one consumer then the consumer finishes but not all producers finish, some are stuck on full queue so the problem never finishes executing.

Well that sounds eminently plausible. If you have multiple threads blocked on a CV, then one signal will wake one of them. The rest will remain blocked.

I am generally inclined to go the other way. If you use your CV correctly, then it is safe to always broadcast to it instead of signaling it, but doing the opposite exposes more area for possible bugs, especially when more than two threads are involved.

For the shutdown scenario in particular, I would recommend just using a broadcast. You need to wake potentially multiple threads, and that's exactly what pthread_cond_broadcast() is for. You could have the main thread do that instead of either consumer or producer if you wish. But if you insist on using only pthread_cond_signal() then you must be sure to call that function enough times to wake all threads that may be blocked on the CV. Again, some or all of those calls could be performed by the main thread.

Notwithstanding my above recommendation to broadcast, a relatively good way to obtain clean shutdown with signaling only would be for each producer to signal the notFull CV before terminating. There are a couple of places you could put that, but I would probably do this, myself:

in your structs you have the member

int reputation;

assuming this is your "way to arrange them" you could declare a nested loop that iterate throug your array to find which team have the highest reputation

for the outer loop to iterate through each team. and the inner loop to iterate through each team reputation"to find the highest reputation".

Edit : Code example

After some research, we were able to find that the reason the camera was being blocked on the testing environment was due to the feature policy header. In our application, it's added via asp.net web.config, since we don't have this on localhost it would work normally.

This will completely block access to camera:

You need to pass the flipped prop of your Card component to your FlipDiv component so that you can use it in the styles.

I assigned relative positioning to the parent progress container to align the line with absolute positioning.

Note: I started rule left: 49.5%. Since the line width is 1px. This means that the line is perfectly centered.

Try this code:

style.css

In your code sample you did not call the setValues() function. That's why you could not control the input. Here are some modifications to your code: