RELEARN | Relation learning on content-rich diffusion networks | Machine Learning library

border is not unsupported in most browsers. It's obsolete and deprecated. Even though it was removed from the HTML spec before HTML5, it may still work in some browsers. It is however, invalid.

If you want to check your HTML doesn't have any errors, use The W3C Vlaidator.

I Assume Panel_ID is a number type. Also assume controls have same names as fields they are bound to.

If field names have space instead of underscore, enclose in [ ]. Use form prefix to reference form's fields and controls. Me can be used as alias for form name in code behind that form.

return from the function

[*]{2} means the two asterisks must be consecutive.

(.*[*]){2} is what you're looking for - it contains two asterisks, with anything in between them.

But we also need to make sure the regex is only testing one tag closure at the same time, so instead of .*, we need to use ((?!<\/array>).)* to make sure it won't consume the end tag while matching .*

The regex can be written as:

I am not 100% sure if I understood what you wanted to implement. However, The cause of the problem here might be from the complexity of how everything is in one place which leaves large room for mistakes. Please try to

1. Place all your CSS should be placed in the head section if you won't use an external file.
2. Place your JavaScript properly in the head/before end of the body tag based on what it does. if you won't use an external file.
3. You don't need to duplicate CSS more than once if the group of elements will share the same style. just use the same class across those elements.
4. The modal should be pushed down to the bottom of the page to make it easier for your to modify your HTML file.
5. In cases like this one you should use loops and arrays to minimize the repition of actions (I do understand that you are completely new to it, this is why I am trying to tell you what you can look up.)

I modified your code and applied some changes now all you need to do if you will add a new modal is add a new line to the Array with both the modal's id and its container's id.

Your full page code be found at the bottom of my answer, the following is a snippet for you to preview the code. if this not what you needed can you please explain further maybe I can help?

Use a vector of control nodes for storage. Whenever you need a new control node, append a one to that vector. Instead of using a pointer, use an iterator to that vector. Make sure you have reserved enough slots in that vector up front, or else your iterators will get invalidated.

There are several reasons why this could fail - it is impossible to tell with the amount of information provided. Most important thing to do is to activate validation layers, try to understand the error message and get rid of it (would also be helpful to post validation layer errors here!).

Some points where you could further investigate:

From the source code given, it appears that you are re-recording the command buffers every frame. If you are doing so, then you'll have to ensure that:

commandBuffer must have been allocated from a pool that was created with the VK_COMMAND_POOL_CREATE_RESET_COMMAND_BUFFER_BIT

(citing the specification). And there must be a call to vkResetCommandBuffer call somewhere. What Vulkan Tutorial is doing is: record command buffers once (one for each frame in flight) and reuse those pre-recorded command buffers every frame.

Regarding currentFrame and imageIndex: In the optimal case, they would be in sync because then the

I guess the main problem is that when you run the first two tests, the static variable personCounter becomes 2 as you are creating two objects. Then when you run the third test, it starts from the 3 and goes upto 6.

I guess if you add another method to set the person counter to zero and call this method before creating the objects in the third test, you would get 4 as your output.

Add this in you class as a function

public static void setNumberOfPersons(int value) { personCounter = value; }

And then call Person.setNumberOfPersons(0); first in the third test

Edit:

Thanks to seelenvirtuose(see comment) for pointing out the random order part for tests. As said, I suppose the problem would go away by setting the value to 0 in the third test. This way the order would not matter.