dumpable | Let Rails dump out your SQL | SQL Database library

 by   hunterae Ruby Version: Current License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | dumpable Summary

kandi X-RAY | dumpable Summary

dumpable is a Ruby library typically used in Database, SQL Database applications. dumpable has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Let Rails dump out your SQL
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              dumpable has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 9 star(s) with 14 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 2 open issues and 1 have been closed. There are 2 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of dumpable is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              dumpable has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              dumpable has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              dumpable code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              dumpable is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              dumpable releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed dumpable and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into dumpable implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • dump value
            • Generate a record from the database
            • recursive method for dumping
            • Dump a dump .
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            dumpable Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for dumpable.

            dumpable Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for dumpable.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Is there a mechanism for manipulating a process like prctl(), but for forked/exec*()d processes?
            Asked 2019-Feb-27 at 20:02

            Is it possible to do the equivalent of prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, 0), but for other process, e.g. a child process, or one that was exec'd? The program below demonstrates that the dumpable flag is not inherited by a process that was execv'd.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Feb-27 at 20:02

            I don't want others to be able to read this process data from /proc. Is there some alternative way to do this?

            The contents of the per-process subdirectories in /proc are ordinarily owned by the effective uid and effective gid of the corresponding process. The only documented condition in which that's different is when the process's dumpable attribute has a value different from 1.

            The reason I want this is that I have a program which runs as a regular user and reads sensitive data (passwords) from stdin

            If the program in question runs as a regular user that you can choose, then the easiest thing to do is to choose a for-purpose user with a private primary group. For the purpose of /proc access, that should be about as good as setting the process non-dumpable or running it as root. Maybe better, if the process wants to be able to read from its own /proc entry. This is pretty natural, too. It does not, however, serve the primary purpose of turning off the dumpable flag -- i.e. to prevent the process from dumping core.

            If the program itself is under your control, then you can simply modify it to issue an appropriate prctl() call. I suppose that this is not your case.

            Otherwise, the program cannot be modified and must be runnable by arbitrary users. According to the prctl() documentation, there are four ways other than calling prctl() to cause a process's dumpable flag to be turned off:

            • The process's effective user or group ID is changed.

            • The process's filesystem user or group ID is changed (see credentials(7)).

            • The process executes (execve(2)) a set-user-ID or set- group-ID program, resulting in a change of either the effective user ID or the effective group ID.

            • The process executes (execve(2)) a program that has file capabilities (see capabilities(7)), but only if the permitted capabilities gained exceed those already permitted for the process.

            These all describe situations in which the process is differently affected by access controls than ordinary processes started by the same user, which comes back around to my original suggestion of arranging for appropriate access control simply by controlling the user as which the program runs. After all, who cares if a random user runs the program and is able to retrieve secrets that they themselves entered? An issue arises only if other people can be tricked into divulging secrets to the program. But if you're considering this alternative then you've already rejected the easy option.

            With the program ultimately being launched by a non-privileged user, changing its effective or filesystem credentials, even via a wrapper program, is not a viable alternative by itself. You're left, then, with making the program SUID or SGID, or assigning it capabilities that you can rely on differing from the user's normal ones. Note that the SUID / SGID target, if you go that way, does not need to be root; it just needs to be different from the user's own. This does, however, return again to having a designated identity for the program to run as.

            The capabilites option requires your system to support capabilities, of course. If it doesn't then SUID / SGID is your only remaining option. Both of these are controlled by attributes attached to the program binary in the filesystem, so they do not require you to modify the program itself.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54912342

            QUESTION

            Cyclic package dependency while implementing proc macro
            Asked 2019-Feb-05 at 23:34

            I try to implement a proc_macro Dump, which is similar to serdes Serialize.

            For this purpose I have a crate foo which contains my "primitive" structs (P1 and P2 in this case) which should only be dumpable.

            Next I do have a foo_derive crate which contains the procedural macro itself.

            Because I want to support multiple formats I have a third crate foo_dump which contains the trait definition of Dump (e.g. this struct can be dumped) and Dumper (this is something the backend should implement). Very straight forward until this point.

            When I now want to compile it, I get this error:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Jan-08 at 12:23

            Thanks to @Boiethious comment and his help in chat I was able to come up with a solution, which involes introducing a new crate foo_core which contains the structs P1 and P2.

            So what I did was:

            • Removing P1 and P2 from foo and putting them into foo_core
            • Removing the dependency foo_dump from foo_derive so it only depends on syn and quote anymore
            • Adding foo_core as a dependency in foo and foo_dump
            • Adding the dependency foo_dump to foo

            (you can see the full list of changes in the git history).

            The final dependency chain now looks like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54088182

            QUESTION

            Why do files in /proc/self end up being owned by root if a program has its setuid bit set?
            Asked 2017-Oct-23 at 22:14

            I have this small program:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Oct-23 at 20:26

            Any suid process will default to have its /proc/self directory owned by root for security reasons (to prevent users from inducing a core dump and inspecting its memory for valuable info).

            You can set the owner after a suid by manually making the process dumpable with the prctl PR_SET_DUMPABLE.

            Here's proc(5), containing a description of what's going on and how to affect it:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46897570

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install dumpable

            You can download it from GitHub.
            On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/hunterae/dumpable.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone hunterae/dumpable

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:hunterae/dumpable.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link