static-analyzer | This repository hosts the static analyzer
kandi X-RAY | static-analyzer Summary
kandi X-RAY | static-analyzer Summary
This repository hosts the static analyzer. It analyzes the control flow and data flow, and identifies each ORM APIs that issues DB queries. This analyzer can help find some anti-patterns mentioned in the paper. For example, by checking how the query result is used in the application, it understands where unnecessary data retrieval happens.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Create a new Git repository
- Create a new Order
- Generates a message for the user .
- Instantiates a new Git project .
- Perform a search
- This function updates the user .
- Removes a single person from the database
- Adds an association with the given options .
- Creates a payment for a user
- Returns the HTML HTML for this link
static-analyzer Key Features
static-analyzer Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on static-analyzer
QUESTION
My use case is as follows. In the automated testing of one of my libraries I use the mktemp function in order to obtain a filename in order to create a temporary file. Xcode correctly complains about this as a security risk, but in this case I have no option (the API I must follow demands filenames) and I am willing to take the risk since the code is only the test code and not in an actual service. (Hence the security risk is not applicable.)
I suppose I could create my own version of a mktemp that is local to my testing, but I would prefer not to write things that have already been written.
So what I am wondering is if there is a way that I can tell the analyzer to stop complaining this instance of the problem? Note that this differs from the question asked in Is it possible to suppress Xcode 4 static analyzer warnings? in that this is not a false positive, and I do not want to suppress analyzing the file or all instances of this check. I just want to suppress this one instance. (i.e. something similar to cppcheck-suppress comment in Cppcheck)
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Sep-01 at 00:19@JonathanLeffler last comment was absolutely correct and I don't know how I missed it when I read the question I referenced. The following code segment does exactly what I want - it suppresses the analyzer warning in this instance of mktemp while leaving it active for all other instances that would use mktemp.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install static-analyzer
On a UNIX-like operating system, using your system’s package manager is easiest. However, the packaged Ruby version may not be the newest one. There is also an installer for Windows. Managers help you to switch between multiple Ruby versions on your system. Installers can be used to install a specific or multiple Ruby versions. Please refer ruby-lang.org for more information.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page