sitemap.js | Sitemap-generating framework for node.js | Sitemap library
kandi X-RAY | sitemap.js Summary
kandi X-RAY | sitemap.js Summary
Sitemap-generating framework for node.js
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of sitemap.js
sitemap.js Key Features
sitemap.js Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on sitemap.js
QUESTION
As in Google Docs it is shown that my feed needs to look like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-19 at 12:03Okay I solved this issue.
I am not sure how this works but we actually don't need the tags in the question that is also stated in Google docs.
With feed module nuxt/feed we can actually do it. (It's own documentation explains everything needed) After creating RSS feed we just need to copy our path to Google publisher center and it reads our feed and it works.
QUESTION
I´d like to dynamically generate a sitemap.xml containing all static and dynamic user links (through uids from Firestore) with Cloud Functions when a user or a crawler requests https://www.example.com/sitemap.xml
. I already managed to implement a working version using sitemap.js
(https://github.com/ekalinin/sitemap.js#generate-a-one-time-sitemap-from-a-list-of-urls) and Firebase Hosting rewrites. However, my current solution (see below) generates one large sitemap.xml and only works for up to 50000 links which is not scalable.
Current solution:
Hosting rewrite in firebase.json
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-14 at 18:30As you noted, this isn't scalable and your costs are going to skyrocket since you pay per read/write on Firestore, so I would recommend rethinking your architecture.
I solved a similar problem several years ago for an App Engine website that needed to generate sitemaps for millions of dynamically created pages and it was so efficient that it never exceeded the free tier's limits.
Step 1: Google Storage instead of Firestore
When a page is created, append that URL to a text file in a Google Storage bucket on its own line. If your URLs have a unique ID you can use that to search and replace existing URLs.
QUESTION
I am trying to use Server-side-rendering in create-react-application but i have been getting the following error. I have tried to update the babel version and change the type : 'commonjs' in package.json but is of no use.
This is the link i have been refering to implement ssr in my project link A hands-on guide for a Server-Side Rendering React app
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-11 at 09:19Try adding "type": "module"
to your package.json
.
QUESTION
I want to use https://github.com/iamvishnusankar/next-sitemap to generate Sitemap.
However, when I use it normally like:
next-sitemap.js ...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-23 at 15:06I used a custom sitemap generator like:
scripts/build-sitemap.jsQUESTION
I'm trying to write a text file encoded in UTF-8 with JavaScript.
I have to write this text file via command line, so my code is like below...
My script.js:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-22 at 09:18fs.writeFileSync doesn't write file in UTF-8
Actually it did. US-ASCII is a subset of UTF-8 for characters with a character code 127 and below. So, it's both US-ASCII and UTF-8.
For plain ascii characters below 127, there is no physical difference between UTF-8 and US-ASCII. US-ASCII characters encode to themselves in UTF-8.
A file like you're writing doesn't typically record what character set it is. It's up to the reading software to either infer the encoding from the data it finds or use other clues such as the file extension to guess. So, your program is just telling you that your file meets all the requirements of US-ASCII and thus looks like US-ASCII which happens to be a subset of UTF-8.
Put some Japanese characters in there and it will look different since they don't fit into US-ASCII. They will use multiple bytes to encode properly.
QUESTION
I need to create 2 different JavaScript and CSS files, one minimized and the other one not.
I want to render the not minimized files only in Chrome, for the other browsers I want the regular minimized and compresed code.
I've tried with preset-env, changing the .babelrc file, I even tried with browserlist.
webpack.dev.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jun-28 at 17:26You will need 2 different webpack configs, pass command line arguments like the below:
webpack --env.browser=chrome --open 'Google Chrome'
webpack --env.browser=other --open safari
And maintain 2 different webpack configs in webpack.chrome.js
and webpack.other.js
and put this in webpack.config.js
QUESTION
I have a route built up like this in different files.
I need one of the routes to respond to all of these extensions (including no extension):
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Aug-06 at 18:18I was able to match using another .use
for the route using the extension.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install sitemap.js
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page