multi_index | Minimal boost : :multi_index implementation | Build Tool library
kandi X-RAY | multi_index Summary
kandi X-RAY | multi_index Summary
Boost, although a great library, aims to maintain compatibility with as many compilers as possible, with workarounds for the buggiest of systems. These abstractions have a cost, and now that C++11 compilers are available for every major system, most of the Boost machinery is now more trouble than it’s worth. Boost.MultiIndex is an excellent library, with use for modern code, however, it depends on archaic machinery. Removing this machinery to use variadic templates removes ~140,000 lines of code, and dramatically improves compilation time and memory, simplifying its integration in a modern development environment.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of multi_index
multi_index Key Features
multi_index Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on multi_index
QUESTION
I need to plot a pivot chart from a multi-indexed pivot table. This is my pivot table description "multi_index = pd.pivot_table(df_new, index = ['Device_ID', 'Temp' ,'Supply'],columns = 'Frequency', values = 'NoiseLevel',)"
I used Plotly at that time it is coming as a single straight line. I am expecting two zig-zag lines one for frequency 0.8 and the other for 1.6 as shown in the first figure. could you please tell me where I went wrong? please see my code below. I don't know where I need to put the "columns = 'Frequency'" I think it needs to come at Y axis. Please see my dta frame below(Pivot Table)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-04 at 15:14- plotly does not directly support multi-index
- concat values in multi-index to a string that identifies it
- generate a plotly scatter per column
QUESTION
I am in a situation where I am forced to use a std::vector
container as my underlying data structure. I'm trying to exploit boost::multi_index::sequenced<>
to shadow the vector offset, and provide a mechanism for richer data queries. I really don't want to unnecessarily copy all the data from one container to another.
In the example code snippet below I have a class BarInterface
that manages the insertion and removal of elements to the Bar::foos
container. Initially I tried to store references to the vector elements as elements of the typedef boost::multi_index_container
, but these are not stable against insertions.
What I'd like to do is have a custom key extractor that is a function of the _bar
container and the boost::multi_index::sequenced<>
index. So, for example to get the name of an element, I'd find the sequence offset x
, and then _bar.foos[x].name
. So, I'm really just using boost::multi_index
as a proxy for richer queries against a vector of variable size.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-21 at 09:14This is extremely brittle and I wouldn't recommend going to production with such code, but since you asked for it:
QUESTION
Say I have some boost graph
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-17 at 16:23That's (obviously) not a feature of the library.
You can however use ranges or range adaptors, like you would in any other situation:
QUESTION
What I want to to: Let's say I have data in form of a 1D array. After fitting that data, (scipy.optimize.curve_fit), this will be reduces to a skaler/0D array. So far so good. That is the easy part.
The problem is, that the data is not actually in 1D, but (n+1)D. So I will have to iterate over the whole array over all axis but one, take a 1D slice, fit that slice and write this into a new array with n dimensions. For the sake of simplicity I used the sum function instead of fitting in this example code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-14 at 16:20For a general python function, there isn't a fast compiled way of doing this kind of reduction. Regardless of the iteration mechanism, you end up having to call the func
once for each of the nD
set of values.
For np.sum
you can just specify the axis
. This is essentially a np.add.reduce
.
np.apply_along_axis
works much like your nditer
, except it moves the slice dimension to the end, making the 'insert' easier. And it uses ndindex
to generate the indexing tuples - but that too uses nditer
. It's documentation is wrong; it isn't faster.
Some comparative timings:
QUESTION
I have a piece of code which iterates over a three-dimensional array and writes into each cell a value based on the indices and the current value itself:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-01 at 09:47An interesting question, with a few possible solutions. As you indicated, it is possible to use np.array_split
, but since we are only interested in the indices, we can also use np.unravel_index, which would mean that we only have to loop over all the indices (the size) of the array to get the index.
Now there are two great ideas for multiprocessing:
- Create a (thread safe) shared memory of the array and splitting the indices across the different processes.
- Only update the array in a main thread, but provide a copy of the required data to the processes and let them return the value that has to be updated.
Both solutions will work for any np.ndarray
, but have different advantages. Creating a shared memory doesn't create copies, but can have a large insertion penalty if it has to wait on other processes (the computational time, is small compared to the write time.)
There are probably many more solutions, but I will work out the first solution, where a Shared Memory object is created and a range of indices is provided to every process.
Required imports:
QUESTION
I have multi index container like below
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-07 at 13:52Two-phase lookup was recently fixed in MSVC. You might now run into a diagnostic that this use of typename
was actually non-conformant (should never have compiled):
QUESTION
I've a dataframe with the following structure:
Time Company Product_type Total_sales 2021-01-31 06:00:00+00:00 Adidas Shoes 20 2021-01-31 05:00:00+00:00 Adidas Shoes 13 2021-01-31 03:00:00+00:00 Adidas Shoes 4 2021-01-31 03:00:00+00:00 Nike Shoes 5 2021-01-31 02:00:00+00:00 Adidas Shoes 3 2021-01-31 02:00:00+00:00 Nike Shoes 3What I need to do is to "fill" the time_hour gaps with the nearest previous value (time) according to their company and product_type. In this case, for Adidas, a row for the 04:00 is missing so it'll need to be filled with 4, the value from 03:00 sales.
Time Company Product_type Total_sales 2021-01-31 06:00:00+00:00 Adidas Shoes 20 2021-01-31 05:00:00+00:00 Adidas Shoes 13 2021-01-31 04:00:00+00:00 Adidas Shoes 4 2021-01-31 03:00:00+00:00 Adidas Shoes 4 2021-01-31 03:00:00+00:00 Nike Shoes 5 2021-01-31 02:00:00+00:00 Adidas Shoes 3 2021-01-31 02:00:00+00:00 Nike Shoes 3I know how to do it in the case of using a datetime as the unique index but this multi_index setting is something I couldn't solve for the moment.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-04 at 21:33First we need to make sure that the Time column is a datetime column.
QUESTION
I have a three-dim Series like this
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-26 at 21:19IIUC, you can try something like this:
QUESTION
In my code I need to have a functionality to iterate over all elements and check if there some element already exists possibly as soon as possible, so my choice fell on boost multi index container where I can use vector and unordered_set interface for my class Animal at the same time. The problem is that I am not able to find some element through unordered_set interface since I replaced key from std::string to std::array and adjusted the code, and I don't know what I am doing wrong ?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-22 at 02:51There are a number of bugs like in the move constructor:
QUESTION
Is it possible to use lambda for hashing in hashed__unique interface for boost::multi_index? See this example: https://godbolt.org/z/1voof3
I also saw this: How to use lambda function as hash function in unordered_map? where the answer says:
You need to pass lambda object to unordered_map constructor since lambda types are not default constructible.
and I'm not sure is it even possible to do for the given example on godbolt.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-24 at 00:20I don't think you can. With a standard container you would have had to supply the actual instance to the constructor. However, MultiIndex doesn't afford that:
Loophole?As explained in the index concepts section, indices do not have public constructors or destructors. Assignment, on the other hand, is provided. Upon construction, max_load_factor() is 1.0.
You can perhaps get away with a locally defined class:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install multi_index
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page