Aurora-Server | ESP32 controlled , addressable RGB LED strip server
kandi X-RAY | Aurora-Server Summary
kandi X-RAY | Aurora-Server Summary
A wireless, ESP32 controlled, addressable RGB LED strip server (UDP streaming & JSON API)
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of Aurora-Server
Aurora-Server Key Features
Aurora-Server Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Aurora-Server
QUESTION
Trying to connect a Spring Boot container to an Aurora Serverless database. Here's what works:
- Connecting the container to a provisioned Aurora database
- Connecting to the serverless database from my computer via
psql
However, when I configure the database connection parameters for the serverless database and start the container, I get the following error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-27 at 09:55I made it work adding ?gssEncMode=disable
to the jdbc url.
ex: jdbc:postgresql://dev-aurora-postgres-serverless.cluster-xxxxxxx.eu-central-1.rds.amazonaws.com:5432/my_db?gssEncMode=disable
QUESTION
We have a bunch of on-premises applications each running their own local MySQL servers. Our workload is light, with occasional bursts of activity (a B2B business model with some specific times of the month in which it is more profitable to use our application, and therefore we see usage spikes during those days). We decided that it would be a good idea to simplify the infrastructure by moving all the databases into one server/cluster, and after some discussion decided that buying a managed solution would be better than trying to set up and maintain our own MySQL cluster (none of us are DBAs).
We did a thorough amount of research, and eventually settled on Amazon Aurora Serverless as a solid candidate for its auto-scaling capabilities, and therefore (potentially) lower cost compared to the alternatives we examined (AWS MySQL RDS and DigitalOcean managed MySQL), due to our usually-light workload with occasional bursts of activity.
However, from what I can gather it is impossible to just simply connect to AWS Aurora Serverless (see Not able connect Amazon Aurora Serverless from SQL client for example) from our on-premises applications, so my question is:
- What is the best-practice, modern way to solve this problem - should we use a site-to-site VPN to connect our on-premises hosts to the cloud? Would this end up costing us significantly more?
- Is Aurora Serverless really the best solution at all, or should we fall back to Amazon RDS, or DigitalOcean's managed MySQL cluster, both of which allow assigning public IPs but neither of which will auto-scale (meaning we'd need to buy a tier based on our peak usage, and potentially waste a lot of money as it will sit almost idle for a large part of the month)?
What we want to achieve is a simple, fire-and-forget MySQL cluster set up that's managed by someone else, ideally auto-scales, and doesn't cost the earth or end up being more difficult to manage than the current, on-premises solution.
We are not cloud-averse, but neither do we want to suddenly start moving everything into the cloud all at once just for the sake of a simpler database infrastructure.
To throw an extra spanner into the works, we don't manage our own firewalls - so setting up a site-to-site VPN could be tricky and involve coordinating with a third party (our network provider). Ideally I'd like to avoid this hassle too, if at all possible.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-18 at 04:11You are correct, you can't directly connect to Aurora Serverless (AS) from outside AWS. The reason is that AS cannot be public. From docs:
You can't give an Aurora Serverless DB cluster a public IP address. You can access an Aurora Serverless DB cluster only from within a virtual private cloud (VPC) based on the Amazon VPC service.
AS has also many other limitations that you should be aware, some of them are: no replicas nor no IAM authentication.
Q1 Connection to ASThere are several options which are used to connect to SA, or other services not accessible from the internet (e.g. RDS Proxy, ElasticSearch domain).
Bastion/jump hostThe cheapest, most ad-hoc option used mostly employed for testing and development, is by using a bastion/jump host. Using this option you would setup ssh tunnels to the bastion which in turn would connect you to the AS.
However, this is obviously not suitable for reliable access, but I feel this should be at least mentioned in the answer.
AWS Site-to-Site VPNAWS Site-to-Site VPN is other option, as you already mentioned. This is obviously better way of enabling access from on-prem to VPC.
But the concern is the cost, as your charged $0.05 per hour and per data transfer.
The price per hour is not that much. For 1 month it is about $3.6/month:
QUESTION
I have an existing project with Rails 5.2 and Mongoid 7, I had previously disabled all activerecord-related modules.
We are working on some synchronization with business intelligence data warehouses, and I discovered this gem that seems like a good starting point : I'm planning to use ActiveRecord with this adapter to easily implement code that will push data to my Amazon Aurora DB for BI purposes.
I have created a simple model
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-28 at 15:25Here is a summary of the things I ended up doing
add required gems in your Gemfile (as a matter of fact, the gem I added did not even require the mysql2 gem which is quite a relief as mysql2 has dependencies on the local OS libs, and you're quite likely to encounter many bugs)
create a
config/database.yml
file, and have one key per environment you need, with the AR config you needin application.rb, add
require 'active_record/railtie'
(the railtie will initialize connection from the database.yml file)create some models
Maybe you need extra adapters for local/test/staging/prod environments
Add a container for a SQL DB if you're working with docker-compose
QUESTION
From Aurora Serverless's document, there are 3 ways to create an Aurora serverless DB cluster: AWS management console, CLI, and RDS API. (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/aurora-serverless.create.html)
Form my understanding, one would use EngineMode
in the RDS API to create Aurora Serverless, but this property is not available in AWS::RDS::DBCluster
yet (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-rds-dbcluster.html).
Would it be possible to create an Aurora Serverless Cluster from cloudformation? Any advice would be appreciated!
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-03 at 09:21It is now possible to create an AWS::RDS::DBCluster
with an EngineMode
set to serverless
. See more here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-rds-dbcluster.html#cfn-rds-dbcluster-enginemode
QUESTION
So I've been trying to setup a BI tool with my Serverless backend i.e. Aurora MySQL.
Architecture as below:
Implementation on these lines: tutorial-link
Now, I'm exploring options for connecting this backend with a BI/Analytics tool for quick querying and visualisation purposes.
Since, our backend is a Aurora MySQL Serverless, the limitation would be to not be able to connect directly to the endpoint like how one could do with a provisioned one.
As stated here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/aurora-serverless.html
On similar lines, I'm trying to setup a AWS Direct Connect, which is currently in requested stage:
I need assistance whether this is right approach, if so, are there any tutorials for using Direct Connect with Aurora Serverless?
On the other hand, are there any bi tools anyone has successfully used with Serverless backends.
Need is to be able to get up and running in the shortest amount of time, to get quick inferences. And then move to ETLs or more complex use cases.
Any assistance much appreciated!
Thanks, Arnab
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Mar-06 at 06:17Figured this out.
One needs to setup an Enterprise QuickSight Account to be able to connect to Private VPCs. The regular QuickSight Account expects the endpoints to be publicly available. While Serverless endpoints aren't.
Limitations: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/aurora-serverless.html
Prerequisites: Enterprise QuickSight Account, Aurora Serverless cluster and make sure your cluster has active capacity units when creating the connection.
QUESTION
AWS documentation states that Aurora Serverless DB cannot have a public IP Address:
You can't give an Aurora Serverless DB cluster a public IP address. You can access an Aurora Serverless DB cluster only from within a virtual private cloud (VPC) based on the Amazon VPC service.
However, this confuses me as I was just able to set "Public accessibility" to "Yes". I was also able to connect to the database outside the VPC using the endpoint specified.
Am I misunderstanding the limitations (Public IP)? Or is this something that was made possible just recently?
Thank you!
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-09 at 08:16The part you quoted mentions Aurora Serverless - this is different to the Aurora you are using in your picture.
Serverless is only available inside VPC as your quote states - Standard Aurora can be made publicly accessible, although generally it's better practice to restrict access to inside VPC only.
QUESTION
I set up an Aurora Database (provisioned) in a newly created VPC and no public accessibility. As I want to run a Lambda function in the VPC which is able to both, access the RDS instances as well as the Internet, I changed the routing tables of the RDS instances to allowing traffic from a NAT gateway which I placed in a public subnet in the same VPC.
For the Lambda function itself, I created a separate private subnet, also just allowing traffic from the NAT gateway in the routing table. I assigned this subnet and VPC to the Lambda function in the Lambda settings. The internet connection works fine with this configuration but I can not access the database. That's why I followed this post (https://serverfault.com/questions/941886/connect-an-aws-lambda-function-triggered-by-api-gateway-to-aurora-serverless-mys) and added the IP CIDR of the Lambda subnet to the Security Group of the RDS instances (called rds-launch-wizard).
Still, the Lambda function is able to interact with the public internet but can not connect to the RDS instances (timeout). I'm running out of ideas, what is wrong here?
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Mar-06 at 10:41The configuration should be:
- A Public subnet with a NAT Gateway (and, by definition, an Internet Gateway)
- A Private subnet with the Amazon RDS instance
- The same, or a different, Private Subnet associated with the Lambda function
- The Private Subnet(s) configured with a Route Table with a destination of
0.0.0.0/0
to the NAT Gateway
Then consider the Security Groups:
- A security group for the Lambda function (
Lambda-SG
) that permits all outbound access - A security group for the RDS instance (
RDS-SG
) that should permit inbound access fromLambda-SG
on the appropriate database port
That is, RDS-SG
is allowing incoming traffic from Lambda-SG
(by name). There is no need to use CIDRs in the security group.
The Lambda function will connect to a private subnet via an Elastic Network Interface (ENI) and will be able to communicate both with the RDS instance (directly) and with the Internet (via the NAT Gateway).
Please note that you are not directing "traffic from the NAT Gateway". Rather, you are directing Internet-bound traffic to the NAT Gateway. Nor is there such a thing as "routing tables of the RDS instances" because the Route Tables are associated with subnets, not RDS.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install Aurora-Server
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page