concurrencpp | Modern concurrency for C++ | Reactive Programming library
kandi X-RAY | concurrencpp Summary
kandi X-RAY | concurrencpp Summary
concurrencpp is a task-centric library. A task is an asynchronous operation. Tasks offer a higher level of abstraction for concurrent code than traditional thread-centric approaches. Tasks can be chained together, meaning that tasks pass their asynchronous result from one to another, where the result of one task is used as if it were a parameter or an intermediate value of another ongoing task. Tasks allow applications to utilize available hardware resources better and scale much more than using raw threads, since tasks can be suspended, waiting for another task to produce a result, without blocking underlying OS-threads. Tasks bring much more productivity to developers by allowing them to focus more on business-logic and less on low-level concepts like thread management and inter-thread synchronization. While tasks specify what actions have to be executed, executors are worker-objects that specify where and how to execute tasks. Executors spare applications the managing of thread pools and task queues themselves. Executors also decouple those concepts away from application code, by providing a unified API for creating and scheduling tasks. Tasks communicate with each other using result objects. A result object is an asynchronous pipe that pass the asynchronous result of one task to another ongoing-task. Results can be awaited and resolved in a non-blocking manner. These three concepts - the task, the executor and the associated result are the building blocks of concurrencpp. Executors run tasks that communicate with each-other by sending results through result-objects. Tasks, executors and result objects work together symbiotically to produce concurrent code which is fast and clean. concurrencpp is built around the RAII concept. In order to use tasks and executors, applications create a runtime instance in the beginning of the main function. The runtime is then used to acquire existing executors and register new user-defined executors. Executors are used to create and schedule tasks to run, and they might return a result object that can be used to marshal the asynchronous result to another task that acts as its consumer. When the runtime is destroyed, it iterates over every stored executor and calls its shutdown method. Every executor then exits gracefully. Unscheduled tasks are destroyed, and attempts to create new tasks will throw an exception. In this basic example, we created a runtime object, then we acquired the thread executor from the runtime. We used submit to pass a lambda as our given callable. This lambda returns void, hence, the executor returns a result object that marshals the asynchronous result back to the caller. main calls get which blocks the main thread until the result becomes ready. If no exception was thrown, get returns void. If an exception was thrown, get re-throws it. Asynchronously, thread_executor launches a new thread of execution and runs the given lambda. It implicitly co_return void and the task is finished. main is then unblocked. In this example, we start the program by creating a runtime object. We create a vector filled with random numbers, then we acquire the thread_pool_executor from the runtime and call count_even. count_even is a coroutine that spawns more tasks and co_awaits for them to finish inside. max_concurrency_level returns the maximum amount of workers that the executor supports, In the threadpool executor case, the number of workers is calculated from the number of cores. We then partition the array to match the number of workers and send every chunk to be processed in its own task. Asynchronously, the workers count how many even numbers each chunk contains, and co_return the result. count_even sums every result by pulling the count using co_await, the final result is then co_returned. The main thread, which was blocked by calling get is unblocked and the total count is returned. main prints the number of even numbers and the program terminates gracefully.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of concurrencpp
concurrencpp Key Features
concurrencpp Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Reactive Programming
QUESTION
How can we divide work of consumers over a limited set of resources in RXJS?
I have a Pool
class here (simplified):
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-31 at 12:55So the main thing is you need to share the actual part that does the work, not only the resources.
Here's a solution from me:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/rxjs-yyxjh2?devToolsHeight=100&file=index.ts
QUESTION
There are two observables: the first named activator
emits booleans. The second named signaler
emits void events. There's a function f()
which must be called under the next conditions:
If the last event from activator
is true
, and event from signaler
comes, call f()
. Otherwise (the last activator
's event is false
, or activator
has not yet emitted anything), "remember" that signaler
sent the event. As soon as activator
emits true
, call f()
and clear "remembered" flag.
Example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-23 at 18:10You need a state machine, but you can contain the state so you aren't leaving the monad... Something like this:
QUESTION
We are using spring webflux (project reactor), as part of the requirement we need to call one API from our server.
For the API call, we need to cache the response. So we are using Mono.cache
operator.
It caches the response Mono
and the next time the same API call happens, it will get it from the cache. Following is example implementation
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-03 at 14:54You can initialize the Mono
in the constructor (assuming it doesn't depend on any request time parameter). Using cache
operator will prevent multiple subscriptions to the source.
QUESTION
I would like to combine two observables in such a way that
- I mirror at most 1 value from the source observable (same moment it arrives),
- Then ignore its subsequent values until the notifier observable emits;
- Then, I allow to mirror at most 1 more value from the source;
- After which I again ignore elements until the notifier observable emits
- etc.
Source:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-20 at 13:05I believe this is a simple use case of the throttle()
operator.
QUESTION
I need to copy date from one source (in parallel) to another with batches.
I did this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-04 at 19:50You need to do your heavy work in individual Publisher
-s which will be materialized in flatMap() in parallel. Like this
QUESTION
Context
I started working on a new project and I've decided to move from RxJava to Kotlin Coroutines. I'm using an MVVM clean architecture, meaning that my ViewModels
communicate to UseCases
classes, and these UseCases
classes use one or many Repositories
to fetch data from network.
Let me give you an example. Let's say we have a screen that is supposed to show the user profile information. So we have the UserProfileViewModel
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-06 at 14:53The most obvious problem I see here is that you're using Flow
for single values instead of suspend
functions.
Coroutines makes the single-value use case much simpler by using suspend functions that return plain values or throw exceptions. You can of course also make them return Result
-like classes to encapsulate errors instead of actually using exceptions, but the important part is that with suspend
functions you are exposing a seemingly synchronous (thus convenient) API while still benefitting from asynchronous runtime.
In the provided examples you're not subscribing for updates anywhere, all flows actually just give a single element and complete, so there is no real reason to use flows and it complicates the code. It also makes it harder to read for people used to coroutines because it looks like multiple values are coming, and potentially collect
being infinite, but it's not the case.
Each time you write flow { emit(x) }
it should just be x
.
Following the above, you're sometimes using flatMapMerge
and in the lambda you create flows with a single element. Unless you're looking for parallelization of the computation, you should simply go for .map { ... }
instead. So replace this:
QUESTION
I am trying to create a table (with DT, pls don't use rhandsontable) which has few existing columns, one selectinput column (where each row will have options to choose) and finally another column which will be populated based on what user select from selectinput dropdown for each row.
in my example here, 'Feedback' column is the user dropdown selection column. I am not able to update the 'Score' column which will be based on the selection from 'Feedback' column dropdown.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-30 at 14:31I'd suggest using dataTableProxy
along with replaceData
to realize the desired behaviour. This is faster than re-rendering the datatable
.
Furthermore, re-rendering the table seems to be messing around with the bindings of the selectInputs
.
Also please note: for this to work I needed to switch to server = TRUE
QUESTION
I'm receiving a request through a rest controller method with an object that I'm then passing to a method in the service layer.
The object in this request contains a list as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-18 at 16:21The expected way to do that is to actually use the fromIterable
method and provide your List
:
QUESTION
The following code attempts to react to one Supply
and then, based on the content of some message, change its mind and react to messages from a different Supply
. It's an attempt to provide similar behavior to Supply.migrate but with a bit more control.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-07 at 10:20I tend to consider whenever
as the reactive equivalent of for
. (It even supports the LAST
loop phaser for doing something when the tapped Supply
is done
, as well as supporting next
, last
, and redo
like an ordinary for
loop!) Consider this:
QUESTION
I'm trying to use Combine to do several millions concurrent request through the network. Here is a mock up of the naive approach I'n using:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-05 at 15:18The issue appears to be a Combine bug, as pointed out here. Using Publishers.Sequence
causes the following operator to accumulate every value sent downstream before proceeding.
A workaround is to type-erase the sequence publisher:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install concurrencpp
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page