WISE | Public repository for WISE
kandi X-RAY | WISE Summary
kandi X-RAY | WISE Summary
WISE is a new subnet inference tool which purpose is to overcome the limitations of state-of-the-art tools such as TreeNET and ExploreNET, in terms of both accuracy and performance. In particular, it is able to complete its subnet inference in a time proportional to the amount of responsive IPs found within a target domain, which drastically reduces its execution time on large target networks. WISE is designed such that it first completely analyzes the target network to both detect responsive IPs and collect some data on each (such as their respective distance as a minimal Time To Live value to get a proper reply) before conducting any subnet inference. All preliminary steps are accomplished in a linear time, but in practice, the data collection process uses some heuristics to speed up the whole process. If we except a short preliminary step which conducts alias resolution on a restricted set of IPs, the subnet inference itself is completely offline and is achieved by processing all discovered and analyzed IP addresses one by one, aggregating them in consecutive subnets (with respect to the address space). WISE is currently only available for IPv4, but its design is arguably much better suited for IPv6 than previous subnet inference tools. It also comes as a 32-bit application (written in C/C++ for Linux distributions) to ensure compatibility with all testbed environments.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of WISE
WISE Key Features
WISE Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on WISE
QUESTION
I'm tackling a exercise which is supposed to exactly benchmark the time complexity of such code.
The data I'm handling is made up of pairs of strings like this hbFvMF,PZLmRb
, each string is present two times in the dataset, once on position 1 and once on position 2 . so the first string would point to zvEcqe,hbFvMF
for example and the list goes on....
I've been able to produce code which doesn't have much problem sorting these datasets up to 50k pairs, where it takes about 4-5 minutes. 10k gets sorted in a matter of seconds.
The problem is that my code is supposed to handle datasets of up to 5 million pairs. So I'm trying to see what more I can do. I will post my two best attempts, initial one with vectors, which I thought I could upgrade by replacing vector
with unsorted_map
because of the better time complexity when searching, but to my surprise, there was almost no difference between the two containers when I tested it. I'm not sure if my approach to the problem or the containers I'm choosing are causing the steep sorting times...
Attempt with vectors:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 07:13You can use a trie data structure, here's a paper that explains an algorithm to do that: https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/jzobel/fulltext/acsc03sz.pdf
But you have to implement the trie from scratch because as far as I know there is no default trie implementation in c++.
QUESTION
I am working on a large Pandas DataFrame which needs to be converted into dictionaries before being processed by another API.
The required dictionaries can be generated by calling the .to_dict(orient='records')
method. As stated in the docs, the returned value depends on the orient
option:
Returns: dict, list or collections.abc.Mapping
Return a collections.abc.Mapping object representing the DataFrame. The resulting transformation depends on the orient parameter.
For my case, passing orient='records'
, a list of dictionaries is returned. When dealing with lists, the complete memory required to store the list items, is reserved/allocated. As my dataframe can get rather large, this might lead to memory issues especially as the code might be executed on lower spec target systems.
I could certainly circumvent this issue by processing the dataframe chunk-wise and generate the list of dictionaries for each chunk which is then passed to the API. Furthermore, calling iter(df.to_dict(orient='records'))
would return the desired generator, but would not reduce the required memory footprint as the list is created intermediately.
Is there a way to directly return a generator expression from df.to_dict(orient='records')
instead of a list in order to reduce the memory footprint?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-25 at 22:32There is not a way to get a generator directly from to_dict(orient='records')
. However, it is possible to modify the to_dict
source code to be a generator instead of returning a list comprehension:
QUESTION
I want to use Julia to reshape an array like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-24 at 15:28You can do a permutedims
on the reshape
result like this:
QUESTION
Suppose I have a dataframe with multiple boolean columns representing certain conditions:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-21 at 15:40Here is one way to do it:
QUESTION
I have a Python code that is creating HTML Tables and then turning it into a PDF file. This is the output that I am currently getting
This image is taken from PDF File that is being generated as result (and it is zoomed out at 55%)
I want to make this look better. Something similar to this, if I may
This image has 13 columns, I don't want that. I want to keep 5 columns but my major concern is the size of the td
in my HTML files. It is too small in width
and that is why, the text is also very stacked up in each td
. But if you look at the other image, text is much more visible and boxes are much more bigger width wise. Moreover, it doesn't suffer from height problems either (the height of the box is in such a way that it covers the whole of the PDF Page and all the tds
don't look like stretched down
)
I have tried to play around the height and width of my td
in the HTML File, but unfortunately, nothing really seemed to work for me.
Edit: Using the code provided by onkar ruikar
, I was able to achieve very good results. However, it created the same problem that I was facing previously. The question was asked here: Horizontally merge and divide cells in an HTML Table for Timetable based on the Data in Python File
I changed up the template.html
file of mine and then ran the same code. But I got this result,
As you can see, that there were more than one lectures in the First Slot of Monday, and due to that, it overlapped both the courses. It is not reading the
The modified template.html
file has this code,
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-25 at 00:43What I've done here is remove the borders from the table and collapsed the space for them.
I've then used more semantic elements for both table headings and your actual content with semantic class names. This included adding a new element for the elements you want at the bottom of the cell. Finally, the teacher and codes are floated left and right respectively.
QUESTION
I have a vector x
of type Eigen::VectorXi
with more than 2^31-1 entries, which I would like to return to R. I can do that by copying x
entry-wisely to a new vector of type Rcpp::IntegerVector
, but that seems to be quite slow.
I am wondering:
- whether there is a more efficient workaround;
- why in the following reproducible example
Rcpp::wrap(x)
doesn't work.
test.cpp
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-16 at 16:36Rcpp::wrap
is dispatching to a method for Eigen matrices and vectors implemented in RcppEigen
. That method doesn't appear to support long vectors, currently. (Edit: It now does; see below.)
The error about negative length is thrown by allocVector3
here. It arises when allocVector3
is called with a negative value for its argument length
. My guess is that Rcpp::wrap
tries to represent 2^31
as an int
, resulting in integer overflow. Maybe this happens here?
In any case, you seem to have stumbled on a bug, so you might consider sharing your example with the RcppEigen
maintainers on GitHub. (Edit: Never mind - I've just submitted a patch.) (Edit: Patched now, if you'd like to build RcppEigen
from sources [commit 5fd125e or later] in order to update your Rcpp::wrap
.)
Attempting to answer your first question, I compared your two approaches with my own based on std::memcpy
. The std::memcpy
approach supports long vectors and is only slightly slower than Rcpp::wrap
.
std::memcpy
approach
The C arrays beneath Eigen::VectorXi x
and Rcpp::IntegerVector y
have the same type (int
) and length (n
), so they contain the same number of bytes. You can use std::memcpy
to copy that number of bytes from one's memory address to other's without a for
loop. The hard part is knowing how to obtain the addresses. Eigen::VectorXi
has a member function data
that returns the address of the underlying int
array. R objects of integer type use INTEGER
from the R API, which does the same thing.
QUESTION
How can I initialize new Vector using the vec!
macro and automatically fill it up with values from an existing array? Here's the code example:
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-11 at 16:21Since Vec
impls From<[T; N]>
, it can be created from an array by using the From::from()
method or the Into::into()
method:
QUESTION
I have a vector with values (val
) and a vector indicating group membership (group
):
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 19:26Matrix::.bdiag()
will let you construct a block-diagonal (sparse) matrix directly from a list of matrices:
QUESTION
HelloWorld.vue
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-30 at 07:19Your usage of computed
property is wrong.
You have to bind the computed property status
, to each objects inside paints
array.
The best option for this one will be creating a seperate component to display the status.
I have refered to this answer for your solution implementation.
Logic
Create a component StatusComponent
inside HelloWorld
component and pass box
, paint
and matchingdata
as props to it.
So your HelloWorld.vue component will be as below.
template
QUESTION
(Solution has been found, please avoid reading on.)
I am creating a pixel art editor for Android, and as for all pixel art editors, a paint bucket (fill tool) is a must need.
To do this, I did some research on flood fill algorithms online.
I stumbled across the following video which explained how to implement an iterative flood fill algorithm in your code. The code used in the video was JavaScript, but I was easily able to convert the code from the video to Kotlin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Bochyn8MMI&t=72s&ab_channel=crayoncode
Here is an excerpt of the JavaScript code from the video:
Converted code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-29 at 08:28I think the performance issue is because of expandToNeighbors
method generates 4 points all the time. It becomes crucial on the border, where you'd better generate 3 (or even 2 on corner) points, so extra point is current position again. So first border point doubles following points count, second one doubles it again (now it's x4) and so on.
If I'm right, you saw not the slow method work, but it was called too often.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install WISE
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page