valuable | A C smart-pointer with value-semantics | Natural Language Processing library

I've been using git my entire development life, and just recently got assigned to an antiquated sourcebase that is unfortunately still using IBM Clearcase for Windows for its version control. I've been struggling to get a grasp on the basics, mostly because there are many things that don't have a clear analog to git, and there isn't much support available for Clearcase since nearly every business no longer uses it.

My main problem is I can't figure out how to checkout a different branch. I've created a snapshot view of a VOB(so in git terms, a local repo cloned from a remote), and I believe I'm on the master branch. I'm looking at it in Rational ClearCase Explorer. I then open up the "Type Explorer", select the VOB I'm working with, and select "branch types". From here I can see every single branch that's been created.

Let's say I want to check out branch "my_branch". I don't see any appropriate selection from the context menu upon right-click in this Clearcase explorer. The only options are "Clone", "Delete", "Rename" and "Properties". From cleartool, I run the command

I couldn't find the what bim stands for in .bim file extension in SSAS tabular model. I did some search on google and SSAS documents, and couldn't find any information?

My concern would look a smaller one, but, I am afraid that when I start working real world, and failed to know what bim stands for in .bim. Could any one please help me find this information.

Thank you for me your valuable time.

When reading about CQRS it is often mentioned that the write model should not depend on any read model (assuming there is one write model and up to N read models). This makes a lot of sense, especially since read models usually only become eventually consistent with the write model. Also, we should be able to change or replace read models without breaking the write model.

However, read models might contain valuable information that is aggregated across many entities of the write model. These aggregations might even contain non-trivial business rules. One can easily imagine a business policy that evaluates a piece of information that a read model possesses, and in reaction to that changes one or many entities via the write model. But where should this policy be located/implemented? Isn't this critical business logic that tightly couples information coming from one particular read model with the write model?

When I want to implement said policy without coupling the write model to the read model, I can imagine the following strategy: Include a materialized view in the write model that gets updated synchronously whenever a relevant part of the involved entities changes (when using DDD, this could be done via domain events). However, this denormalizes the write model, and is effectively a special read model embedded in the write model itself.

I can imagine that DDD purists would say that such a policy should not exist, because it represents a business invariant/rule that encompasses multiple entities (a.k.a. aggregates). I could probably agree in theory, but in practice, I often encounter such requirements anyway.

Finally, my question is simply: How do you deal with requirements that change data in reaction to certain conditions whose evaluation requires a read model?

Our Security Dept requirement on egress traffic is very strict: Each app inside POD must go through some proxy with mTLS authentication (app-proxy) using dedicated cert for the app. They're suggesting using squid with tunneling to cope with double mTLS (one for proxy and the other one for the specific traffic app-server), but then we forced the app to be ssl-aware. Istio can come in and do the job but using out-of-the-box ISTIO_MUTUAL mode (between istio-proxy and egress gateway) is not the case for us.

So, I've tried using example Configure mutual TLS origination for egress traffic by modifying it a bit as follows (changes marked with #- and #+):

I have a requirement where i need to capture XCOM response over Airflow SQLsensor operator and apply some python command to change data format.

code which i have is given below:-

If I have a TextField that is editable and the signer changes their Title while e-signing, is there a manner in which to monitor TextField edits? Currently I am using the EnvelopesApi.list_audit_events to monitor events. In this case, all I can view is that the signer either 'opened', 'viewed', or 'signed' the envelope. Although that is valuable information, I would also like to know which TextFields the signer edited and what the new values are? Did the signer change their email, title, name, etc? In this particular case I am using TextFields to display email, title, name, etc...

Does the Docusign API provide an avenue for fetching this information? If so, would you please provide a snippet demonstrating how to fetch this info?

I'm looking for a method for counting valuables occurrences in the data frame column without using a loop. Values in the data frame have various lengths, which make it for table() function.

A data in the data frame looks like this (below in the code block). Plus there will be even more values in a single vector, than the locally demonstrated maximum.

I'm planning of using the result as an input for a chart.

I've declared a class like this: