slang | SystemVerilog compiler and language services | Code Analyzer library

Your for loop doesn't make sense because the condition for terminating it is k < answer. You are comparing an integer (k) to a pointer (answer). The compiler should have warned you about this, so make sure your compiler warnings are turned on and you are paying attention to them. Pointers and integers are different things, and comparing them is almost never what you want to do.

If answer is null-terminated, you could probably replace that condition with answer[k]. Or maybe updateStarWord needs to take an argument that indicates the length of answer, and then the condition would be k < answer_length.

Per @jonathans comment, the raku docs state:

A method with the special name FALLBACK will be called when other means to resolve the name produce no result. The first argument holds the name and all following arguments are forwarded from the original call. Multi methods and sub-signatures are supported.

You can only use .then() and .catch() on functions that return a Promise. Your getFolder function is doing it correctly, and the first then() that you are using is correct too. But the second then() is called on a function that is not returning a Promise.

I'm not sure how much you are familier with Promises and async/await, but I suggest reading about them before working with them, because they are part of asynchronous codes in javascript wich are kinda hard to work with if you don't understand them first.

Here I wrote a simplified version with async/await, hope it helps:

This code:

It's strange but such issue happens when I try to sync AOSP on my Ubuntu PC to external usb-ssd drive but syncing to main drive to home directory works fine.

Moreover to reproduce such issue it is enough to clone one of the mentioned repos, e.g. libcore:

There is a utility named str.replace in pandas that allows us to replace a substring with another or even find/replace patterns. You can find full documentation here. Your desired output would have appeared like this:

UPDATE

There were two things wrong with the answer:

1. You must only replace in whole word mode, not subword
2. After each entry in the slang file you must keep the changes not discard them

So it would be like this:

Without having seen the source of SyntaxRewriter ...

If a class in C++ does not have a virtual destructor, it's typically not suitable as a base class, because if delete is called on a base class pointer, only the destructor of the base is called, not the one of the actual derived class underlying the pointer. Sometimes that's okay, sometimes you get resource leaks, sometimes you get spurious crashes.

If all done in C++, it's more explicit when you're doing this and it's fine as long as you never delete such a base class pointer. The code being explicit, you can take care to never do this. But in cross-derivation, it may not be obvious that there is a stub in between the C++ base class and the Python derived class, both to mediate calls and manage memory. Both that stub and the actual deletion are thus hidden. Furthermore, the most common use case for cross-derivation is to send instances of the derived Python class into C++ land, where they are likely to be managed. Then, if C++ at some point cleans up the object, without a virtual destructor of the C++ base, the destructor of the stub will not be called, and the Python portion will leak (it will have a reference count too many that never gets cleared). It's only a warning b/c if Python manages the object, there won't be a leak even if there's no virtual destructor.

Implementing a __destruct__ won't make a difference (and shouldn't be done in any case; use __del__ instead if resource cleanup is needed), because the problem, if any, is caused by previously compiled C++ and can't be changed after the fact.

(Note that Python warnings can be suppressed, see https://docs.python.org/3/library/warnings.html .)

Below is the code which is implemented.

If get(text) returns null you will get a NullPointerException because you try to call toString() on the returned object.