ContestLibrary | Library code for programming contests

by SnapDragon64 C++ Version: Current License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | ContestLibrary Summary

ContestLibrary is a C++ library. ContestLibrary has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

"process" is the program I use to automatically add includes and library code to my C++ submissions before submitting. You'll probably have to change a few things before you can use it:.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

ContestLibrary has a low active ecosystem.

It has 20 star(s) with 4 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

ContestLibrary has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of ContestLibrary is current.

Quality

ContestLibrary has no bugs reported.

Security

ContestLibrary has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

ContestLibrary is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

ContestLibrary releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ContestLibrary

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

ContestLibrary Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for ContestLibrary.

ContestLibrary Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for ContestLibrary.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on ContestLibrary

What optimization is the compiler doing for my string reverse method with a classic swapping?

QUESTION

What optimization is the compiler doing for my string reverse method with a classic swapping?

Asked 2018-Feb-08 at 06:12

Question Background

I read this question that is about how to reverse a string as fast as possible. I found that one of the answers was comparing different methods. In one of them, they just run a loop swapping elements from position i with the one at position string.Length-1-i but they use the known tricky swap via XOR. I was wondering how faster is reversing the string using the swap via XOR in comparison with the same method using the classic swap via a temporal variable. Surprisingly I'm getting almost a 50% improvement over the XOR one.

The Question

Is the compiler doing something magic behind the scenes, why I'm I getting this result?

The modified code with the Benchmarks

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Jan-10 at 05:25

You can test below code with Array.Reverse, It will more efficient than other approaches which you are mentioned, Array.Reverse is coded natively and it is very simple to maintain and understand.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48180486

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install ContestLibrary

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: