z3 | The Z3 Theorem Prover
kandi X-RAY | z3 Summary
kandi X-RAY | z3 Summary
The Z3 Theorem Prover
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of z3
z3 Key Features
z3 Examples and Code Snippets
/*++
Copyright (c) 2012 Microsoft Corporation
Module Name:
Program.java
Abstract:
Z3 Java API: Example program
Author:
Christoph Wintersteiger (cwinter) 2012-11-27
Notes:
--*/
import com.microsoft.z3.*;
import java.util.*;
from z3 import *
import heapq
import numpy
import time
import random
verbose = True
# Simplistic (and fragile) converter from
# a class of Horn clauses corresponding to
# a transition system into a transition system
# representation as
# It assume
#
# Unweighted hitting set maxsat solver.
# interleaved with local hill-climbing improvements
# and also maxres relaxation steps to reduce number
# of soft constraints.
#
from z3 import *
import random
counter = 0
def add_def(s, fml):
global c
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on z3
QUESTION
I am trying to reduce lines of code because I realized that I am repeating the same equations every time. I am programming a contour map and putting several sources of intensity into it. Until now I put 3 sources, but in the future I want to put more, and that will increase the lines a lot. So I want to see if it is possible to reduce the lines of "source positions" and "Intensity equations". As you can see the last equation is a logaritmic summation of z1, z2 and z3, is it possible to reduce that, any idea?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 15:45You could iterate over certain parts in a loop.
I tried to keep the same format overall and just rearranged the code to show how you might do it.
QUESTION
I'm experienced with Pandas but stumbled upon a problem that I can't seem to figure out.
I have a large dataset ((40,000, 16)) and I am trying to group it by a specific column ("group_name" for this matter) and then for each group apply the following rules so it'd merge into one row per group:
- x1, x2, x3 are the "important" columns, if one row has less nulls than the others, take it. (see example with row D)
- If there are conflicts in any column, it's arbitrary and we can pick whatever.
- Combine the nulls on the important fields (x1, x2, x3), see example with row A.
Here is an example with 6 rows that should turn into 4 groups (aka 4 rows).
So far I have
groups = df.groupby['group_name']
I tried many other solutions such as summing each group, applying a transformation, aggregating by each 'important' column, merging on each 'important' column and more. Each solution brought it's own problems so I'm offering this question here without limiting people to a certain way.
Also, I spent nearly two days combining different solutions from other questions but none has seem to work. Perhaps I've missed something.
- Please note that since this is a large dataset, I'd very much like to avoid using
for
loop on each group since efficiency is something to consider here.
I hope I explained everything properly, please let me know if something is unclear.
Code to re-create the dataframe (thanks to @Henry Ecker from the first answer):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 16:35Try with groupby aggregate
'first' to get the first (valid) value from every column for each group_name
:
QUESTION
i have a nested json array of objects:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 09:54$arr = json_decode('[{
"form_name": "z1",
"name":"name1",
"peopleCount": "125,678,190",
"children": [{
"form_name": "z2",
"name":"name2",
"peopleCount": "156,987",
"children": [{
"form_name": "z3",
"name":"name2",
"peopleCount": "678,098"
}]
}]
}]', TRUE);
function countTotal($data) {
if(is_array($data)){
foreach($data as $row){
$row['peopleCount'] = 0;///here total val
if(isset($row['children']) {
countTotal($row['children']);
}
}
}
else {
$data['peopleCount'] = 0;//here total val
}
}
countTotal(&$arr);
QUESTION
I have written the following assembly code.
It's displaying the output of writeint as +0
But When I put the debug point on the line before writeint and look at the registers
I see EAX=0000BFBE
. As per my understanding writeint should print the value of EAX
register. What could be the reason that it's showing +0?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-11 at 09:34By putting the breakpoint on the line before, I assume you mean that you put the breakpoint here:
QUESTION
I am trying to verify signatures against a public key, and i got that working using RSACryptoproviders etc. I set the public key (importing the key in PEM format, reading the rsa parameters and then creating an RsaSecurityKey) It all works, but now a client wants me to support not only the PEM format, but also de JWK format.
When I google, I find 100 sites converting PEM's to JWK's (there is a JwkConvert class even) but it only goes one way.
How in c# can I do it the other way around? so I can convert the JWK to a RsaSecurityKey?
I found this post: How to transform a jwk to public key over openssl But i'm hoping i don't have to write all that myself..
Also, i'm allready using BouncyCastle crypto library (I use it for importing the PEM format)
I was hoping I could retreive the RsaParameters from the JWK, but i'm just a user of crypto and the letters don't tell me anything.
to give a bit more information, this is my JWK:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 09:23as it turns out it was an oopsie from my side.. the string i posted was a jsonWebKeySET and not just a single jsonwebkey. I put it in the constructor of the JsonWebKey class and got no parse error whatsoever (grrr microsoft) so assumed it was correct.
Turns out I had to use the JsonWebKeySet() class. @jps comment helped a lot after that. (don't know how to give you credit for that)
QUESTION
I have 4 curves that are represented by these vectors:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-29 at 18:38Alright, so what I'm proposing here is cheating and inventing data, but at least it makes the curves look a little more like you (or your supervisor) want.
QUESTION
I am using a remote Z3 console by sending queries through the standard input and reading stdout/err for errors and responses. The problem is I don't see a way to reasonably check if the query has been successfully executed without falling into data races.
Example of issue:Let's say I send a query
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-29 at 10:26I think (set-option :print-success true)
should do exactly that.
QUESTION
I am trying to get the habit to use Dafny as a friendly SAT-QBF solver for some simple formulae, since doing it in, for instance, Z3 is too uncomfortable.
The context for this is that I have implemented Cooper's algorithm for quantifier elimination and, when all the variables are bounded, it can be used as a decision procedure: therefore, I want to know which is the result that I should get before executing it.
However, I encountered a problem in Dafny.
Let us raise, for instance, this formula (written in Dafny):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-25 at 17:29You cannot do this with Dafny. While Dafny supports quantifiers, booleans, arithmetic, and many other things (recursive functions, sets, sequences, objects and references, multi-dimensional arrays, induction, inductive and coinductive datatypes, bitvectors, greatest and least fixpoints of monotonic functions, etc.), it is not suitable for SAT-QBF (or QBF + artihmetic) benchmarks.
Dafny's errors, including the assertion violation
, tell you that the verifier was not able to do the proof. It may be that the property still holds, but you'll need to supply more of the proof yourself. In other words, you should interpret the assertion violation
as a "don't know" answer. Stated differently, you cannot decide (only semi-decide) formulas with Dafny.
Dafny uses quantifiers in the SMT solvers via matching patterns, aka triggers. When a quantifier has no good triggers, which is what Dafny's "no trigger" warning is telling you, you may see bad performance, unstable verifications, and so-called butterfly effects (where a small and seemingly unrelated part of the program causes a change in the automatic construction of other proofs). Triggers are driven by uninterpreted function symbols, which your example doesn't have at all.
If you want a readable syntax, you may be able to do what you're trying through Boogie. I have not tried that, but you could try putting Boogie in its monomorphic mode and then supplying prover options to ask for the SAT-QBF or something similar (see Boogie's /help
). Otherwise, if you're interested in deciding these problems, then going directly to SMT solver is the way to go.
QUESTION
I'm new to z3 smt solver.I'm using the python API z3py.
I have a quick question concerning the output of the z3.solve() function.what does it mean when I call z3.solve() on some constraints and I get [] as an output? Also could someone refer me to a good documentation please
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-26 at 15:31You really need to provide an input that causes this, as it really depends on your constraints. But here's the simplest way to illustrate this behavior:
QUESTION
I have a list with approximately 150 elements (data frames) of weather data (ID,date,time,temperature). I want to select specific date range and time from each list element (df) and create a data frame (or multiple) with these selected rows. Given the fact I can't provide real data I've created a reproducible example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-26 at 15:29As mentioned by @AntoniosK, your filter logic was off so I made a few amendments but most importantly, for this filter to work, we need to make sure the date and time are "date" and "time" class respectively.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install z3
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page