AC97 | Realtek AC'97 Driver Sample from Windows 8.1 WDK
kandi X-RAY | AC97 Summary
kandi X-RAY | AC97 Summary
Realtek AC'97 Driver Sample from Windows 8.1 WDK
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of AC97
AC97 Key Features
AC97 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on AC97
QUESTION
I want to merge the d
and ann
dataframes but only keep the FID
and IID
from d
dataframe and also the Profile
from ann
dataframe. I only want BP
and Unaffected control
profiles. I also want to change the Profile
column name to Phenotype
.
My code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-19 at 09:10Define a vector of wanted profiles, select from data set d
the columns to be in the final result, and inner_join
with the filtered data set ann
.
QUESTION
I want to add a hyphen -
(after the second letter) to all the variables in the FID
column of the d
dataframe. For example, if the variable is AC10
, I want to change it to AC-10
and likewise AC11
to AC-11
for the entire column.
My attempt:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-17 at 10:26You can use
QUESTION
I want to measure the 1-factor ANOVA with 4-levels: ctl
against schiz
, bp
, dep
. I'm expecting the aov.run
to return a numeric vector with 3 variables, since I'm comparing ctl
against the other three levels. However, I'm only getting 2 variables in aov.run
. Why?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-16 at 19:59aov.run
is returning the p-value associated with the ANOVA run on each of your columns separately. There's only one p-value per ANOVA, so you get one for C1 and one for C2 for a total of two. That's working as expected!
It sounds like you're interested instead in the post-hoc results of the ANOVA, obtained by a Tukey test or something similar. Tukey's HSD will give you the p-value of each comparison separately for 6 comparisons per ANOVA ("Dep.-BP", "Schiz.-BP", "Unaffected control-BP", "Schiz.-Dep.", "Unaffected control-Dep.", and "Unaffected control-Schiz.") and it sounds like you're only interested in the "Unaffected control-BP", "Unaffected control-Dep.", and "Unaffected control-Schiz." comparisons. You can get these by replacing your calls to summary()
with tukeyHSD()
:
QUESTION
I want to rename all the columns as the Profile
variable in ann$Profile
column and its sequential number.
For example, the 4th BP
will be labelled as BP_4
. The 10th Unaffected control
will be labelled as Unaffected control_10
.
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-11 at 10:58A possible solution, but I am not sure whether it is what you want, as your question is not very clear:
QUESTION
I have been trying to host in Heroku for the last week and can't figure out the problem I am facing! The app is deployed and built successfully but when I open the URL it says "Application Error"
Then when I run heroku logs
I was given with this...
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-23 at 15:27Django.utils.six has been removed in django 3.0
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.1/releases/3.0/#removed-private-python-2-compatibility-apis
so you have two options :
Upgrade django-storages version >= 1.8 see release note : https://pypi.org/project/django-storages/1.8/
Downgrade django to version < 3.0
QUESTION
I've followed the detailed advice here to add a custom policy to my Azure B2C service which is designed to populate a groups
claim via an API during the authentication flow.
I've built this on top of a fresh B2C instance and apart from my modifications, the custom policies are those available in the Azure sample here. I'm just using the local accounts sample and my modifications target the SignUpOrSignIn
custom policy. For now, all my changes are in the TrustFrameworkBase.xml file.
When I test the policy via the portal with a redirect URI set to https://jwt.ms/ my resultant token does not include a groups
claim at all. However, via Application Insights I can see my REST api being called with the correct parameter and according to its logs is successfully loading the user groups and returning the expected result.
Is there anything obvious I'm doing wrong here? This is the user journey I've changed:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-05 at 19:47Turns out there was one crucial thing I was missing that wasn't referenced in the guide I was following. I found the answer here. Having retrieved the claim value from my REST API I needed to configure the custom policy to include the claim:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install AC97
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page