reconstruction | 3D reconstruction with openCV and SFM | 3D Printing library
kandi X-RAY | reconstruction Summary
kandi X-RAY | reconstruction Summary
The current structure from motion (SFM) module from openCV's extra modules only runs on Linux. As such, I used docker on my Mac to reconstruct the 3D points. Current docker environment uses Ceres Solver 1.14.0 and OpenCV 3.4.1.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of reconstruction
reconstruction Key Features
reconstruction Examples and Code Snippets
def inverse_mdct(mdcts,
window_fn=window_ops.vorbis_window,
norm=None,
name=None):
"""Computes the inverse modified DCT of `mdcts`.
To reconstruct an original waveform, the same window function
def mdct(signals, frame_length, window_fn=window_ops.vorbis_window,
pad_end=False, norm=None, name=None):
"""Computes the [Modified Discrete Cosine Transform][mdct] of `signals`.
Implemented with TPU/GPU-compatible ops and supports grad
def _unblock_model_reconstruction(self, layer_id, layer):
"""Removes layer from blocking model reconstruction."""
for model_id, v in self.model_layer_dependencies.items():
_, layers = v
if layer_id not in layers:
continue
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on reconstruction
QUESTION
I'm trying to create a USDZ object with the tutorial from Apple Creating 3D Objects from Photographs. I'm using the new PhotogrammetrySession within this sample project: Photogrammetry Command-Line App.
That's the code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 11:53tl;dr: Try another set of images, probably there is something wrong with your set of images.
I've had it work successfully except in one instance, and I received the same error that you are getting. I think for some reason it didn't like the set of photos I took for that particular object. You could try taking just a few photos of another simple object and try again and see if that is the problem with your first run.
QUESTION
Following my previous question , I have written this code to train an autoencoder and then extract the features. (There might be some changes in the variable names)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-09 at 06:42I see that Your model is moved to device which is decided by this line device = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
This can be is either cpu
or cuda
.
So adding this line batch_features = batch_features.to(device)
will actually move your input data to device
.
Since your model is moved to device , You should also move your input to the device.
Below code has that change
QUESTION
- I'm have studied about
Autoencoder
and tried to implement a simple one. - I have built a model with one hidden layer.
- I Run it with
mnist
digits dataset and plot the digits before theAutoencoder
and after it. - I saw some examples which used hidden layer of size 32 or 64, I tried it and it didn't gave the same (or something close to) the source images.
- I tried to change the hidden layer to size of 784 (same as the input size, just to test the model) but got same results.
What am I missing ? Why the examples on the web shows good results and when I test it, I'm getting different results ?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 06:56QUESTION
I am writing an ARKit app where I need to use camera poses and intrinsics for 3D reconstruction.
The camera Intrinsics matrix returned by ARKit seems to be using a different image resolution than mobile screen resolution. Below is one example of this issue
Intrinsics matrix returned by ARKit is :
[[1569.249512, 0, 931.3638306],[0, 1569.249512, 723.3305664],[0, 0, 1]]
whereas input image resolution is 750 (width) x 1182 (height). In this case, the principal point seems to be out of the image which cannot be possible. It should ideally be close to the image center. So above intrinsic matrix might be using image resolution of 1920 (width) x 1440 (height) returned that is completely different than the original image resolution.
The questions are:
- Whether the returned camera intrinsics belong to 1920x1440 image resolution?
- If yes, how can I get the intrinsics matrix representing original image resolution i.e. 750x1182?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-28 at 13:28Intrinsics camera matrix converts between the 2D camera plane and 3D world coordinate space. Here's a decomposition of an intrinsic matrix, where:
fx
andfy
is a Focal Length in pixelsxO
andyO
is a Principal Point Offset in pixelss
is an Axis Skew
According to Apple Documentation:
The values fx and fy are the pixel focal length, and are identical for square pixels. The values ox and oy are the offsets of the principal point from the top-left corner of the image frame. All values are expressed in pixels.
So you let's examine what your data is:
QUESTION
I have been asking several questions for locating and extracting maze from photos on SOF, but none of the answers I get work across different photos, not even across 4 testing photos. Every time when I tweaked the code to make it work for 1 photo, it will fail on the rest of photos due to warped corners/parts or light etc. I feel that I need to find a way which is insensitive to warped image and different intensity of light or the different colors of maze walls(the lines inside a maze).
I have been trying to make it work for 3 weeks without a luck. Before I drop the idea, I would like to ask is it possible to just use Image Processing without AI to locate and extract a maze from a photo? If yes, could you please show me how to do it?
Here are the code and photos:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-12 at 13:17You really want to get these $ 6.9 dishes, he?
For the four given images, I could get quite good results using the following workflow:
- White balance the input image to enforce nearly white paper. I took this approach using a small patch from the center of the image, and from that patch, I took the pixel with the highest
R + G + B
value – assuming the maze is always centered in the image, and there are some pixels from the white paper within the small patch. - Use the saturation channel from the HSV color space to mask the white paper, and (roughly) crop that portion from the image.
- On that crop, perform the existing
reconstruction
approach.
Here are the results:
maze.jpg
simple.jpg
middle.jpg
hard.jpg
That's the full code:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-05 at 13:52The above mentioned package does not implement a inverse nfft
The ndft
is f_hat @ np.exp(-2j * np.pi * x * k[:, None])
The ndft_adjoint
is f @ np.exp(2j * np.pi * k * x[:, None])
Let k = -N//2 + np.arange(N)
, and A = np.exp(-2j * np.pi * k * k[:, None])
A @ np.conj(A) = N * np.eye(N)
(checked numerically)
Thus, for random x
the adjoint transformation is equals to the inverse transform. The given reference paper provides a few options, I implemented Algorithm 1 CGNE, from page 9
QUESTION
I have implemented a variational autoencoder with the Keras implementation as an example (https://keras.io/examples/generative/vae/). When plotting the training loss I noticed that these were not the same as displayed in the console. I also saw that the displayed loss in the console in the Keras example was not right considering total_loss = reconstruction_loss + kl_loss.
Is the displayed loss in the console not the total_loss?
My VAE code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-28 at 09:42Well, apparently François Chollet has made a few changes very recently (5 days ago), including changes in how the kl_loss and reconstruction_loss are computed, see here.
Having run the previous version (that you can find at the link above), I significantly reduced the difference between the two members of the equation, even reducing with increasing epoch (from epoch 7, the difference is <.2), as compared to your values.
It seems that VAE are subject to reconstruction loss underestimation, which is an ongoing issue, and for that, I encourage you to dig a bit in the litterature, with e.g. this article (may not be the best one).
Hope that helps! At least it's a step forward.
QUESTION
I'm working on the signal compression and reconstruction with VAE. I've trained 1600 fragments but the values of 1600 reconstructed signals are very similar. Moreover, results from same batch are almost consistent. As using the VAE, loss function of the model contains binary cross entropy (BCE) and the output of the train model should be located between 0 to 1 (The input data also normalized to 0~1).
VAE model(LSTM) :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-26 at 08:08I've find out the reason of the issue. It turns out that the decoder model derives output value in the range of 0.4 to 0.6 to stabilize the BCE loss. BCE loss can't be 0 even if the prediction is correct to answer. Also the loss value is non-linear to the range of the output. The easiest way to lower the loss is give 0.5 for the output, and my model did. To avoid this error, I standardize my data and added some outlier data to avoid BCE issue. VAE is such complicated network for sure.
QUESTION
I'm a Computer Engineering student at Baskent University(Turkey,Ankara).
Can i use matlab k-wave toolbox codes in visual studio via like importing or creating the library or something, I need to know that for my Gradutation Project.
For example :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-25 at 19:00it is not a trouble-free path, but you can use matlab engine, see examples here
basically, you call engEvalString()
to run matlab commands inside an invisible matlab session in the backend.
if you just need a result, you can use system calls (ShellExecute
orShellExecuteEx
) and call
/path/to/matlab -nojvm -nodesktop < /path/to/yourscript.m > cmdoutput.txt
to invoke a matlab session.
QUESTION
I'm trying to train an autoencoder, with constraints that force one or more of the hidden/encoded nodes/neurons to have an interpretable value. My training approach uses paired images (though after training the model should operate on a single image) and utilizes a joint loss function that includes (1) the reconstruction loss for each of the images and (2) a comparison between values of the hidden/encoded vector, from each of the two images.
I've created an analogous simple toy problem and model to make this clearer. In the toy problem, the autoencoder is given a vector of length 3 as input. The encoding uses one dense layer to compute the mean (a scalar) and another dense layer to compute some other representation of the vector (given my construction, it will likely just learn an identity matrix, i.e., copy the input vector). See the figure below. The lowest node of the hidden layer is intended to compute the mean of the input vector. The rest of the hidden nodes are unconstrained aside from having to accommodate a reconstruction that matches the input.
The figure below exhibits how I wish to train the model, using paired images. "MSE" is mean-squared-error, although the identity of the actual function is not important for the question I'm asking here. The loss function is the sum of the reconstruction loss and the mean-estimation loss.
I've tried creating (1) a tf.data.Dataset to generate paired vectors, (2) a Keras model, and (3) a custom loss function. However, I'm failing to understand how to do this correctly for this particular situation.
I can't get the Model.fit() to run correctly, and to associate the model outputs with the Dataset targets as intended. See code and errors below. Can anyone help? I've done many Google and stackoverflow searches and still don't understand how I can implement this.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-16 at 23:22You can pass a dict
to Model
for both inputs
and outputs
like so:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install reconstruction
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page