PID | repository PID and rotary change interupt

TL;DR. You should check that the pointer returned by bpf_map_lookup_elem is not NULL.

With the following logs, the BPF verifier is telling you that, when it reaches the dereference of my_pid, the pointer may still have a NULL value. It thus contains a map value or a NULL value, i.e., map_value_or_null.

You're doing inflater.inflate(R.layout.fragment_menu, container, false);, not inflating your R.layout.fragment_food_list. You'll need to inflate the right layout to find your Recycler view.

It seems that your HomeFragment doesn't have no parameters constructor. If you want to use fragment that requires constructor parameters you need to provide FragmentFactory to navigation component.

Add empty constructor HomeFragment() to HomeFragment, and it should work.

The logging module has no concept of module-level loggers, as every logger is just established in a hierarchy based on name. paramiko.transport will always exist as a child logger of the paramiko logger by name, not by any module association. Because of this, there isn't really a good way to disable logging by module itself, but you can effectively disable logging for that logger and all child loggers by doing something like logging.getLogger('paramiko').setLevel(logging.CRITICAL+1), since every log message should propagate with a logging level that will be lower than this value, it will cause any log message to drop out before reaching a handler attached to the root logger.

Another question was raised about disabling all logging and then selectively enabling logging where needed. To achieve something like this, the quickest method would be to exclude the addition of any handlers to the root logger, and then add handlers in a "bottom-up" fashion. The reason you would want to do this is because if you end up attaching a handler to a logger that is the child of a logger that the handler has already been attached to, you will get duplicate logging messages, which is definitely of note.

You can store all month names in a list and then sort based on this list.

You didn't describe omitting pg_replslot during your rsync, as the docs recommend. If you didn't omit it, then now your replica has a replication slot which is a clone of the one on the master. But if nothing ever connects to that slot on the replica and advances the cutoff, then the WAL never gets released to recycling. To fix you just need to shutdown the replica, remove that directory, restart it, (and wait for the next restart point to finish).

Do they need to go to wal_archive folder on the disk just like they go to wal_archive folder on the master node?

No, that is optional not necessary. It is set by archive_mode = always if you want it to happen.

As it was described in the reference:

When creating the NavHostFragment using FragmentContainerView or if manually adding the NavHostFragment to your activity via a FragmentTransaction, attempting to retrieve the NavController in onCreate() of an Activity via Navigation.findNavController(Activity, @IdRes int) will fail. You should retrieve the NavController directly from the NavHostFragment instead.

Looks like you should use

The command you want to build, will have to be built using a task. Once built in a task, you can then bind it to which ever key configuration you like. Before I answered this I built a simple example to help demonstrate what I just said.

Create a tasks.json file in the .vscode directory. You can use this command from your projects root:

Tasks are like creating complicated keybinding (well sort'a), its more like a complex keybinding that took steroids, and can do a bunch of stuff keybindings cannot do. All BS aside, it is an extremely powerful tool. VSCode users that are not using it, are missing out on one of the most powerful features that VSCode offers. Anyhow, this is how you create a task that, in-a-nutshell, defines and executes a shell command.

I don't think MutableState is designed to be used in the ViewModel layer, since it's an observable integrated with the compose runtime. You could create a MutableStateFlow instead and use collectAsState() from the view layer.

In your case the issue is probably, because of the state is captured in a coroutine invoked outside composition.