static_vector | resizable vector with fixed capacity
kandi X-RAY | static_vector Summary
kandi X-RAY | static_vector Summary
A dynamically-resizable vector with fixed capacity and embedded storage (revision 3). Project: Programming Language C++, Library Working Group. Reply-to: Gonzalo Brito Gadeschi .
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of static_vector
static_vector Key Features
static_vector Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on static_vector
QUESTION
I was checking aligned_storage
in cppref, but I think its example is buggy. Here is the code:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-09 at 05:57typename std::aligned_storage::type data[N];
QUESTION
I have an application that I want to minimize dynamic allocation for efficiency.
I'm leaning forward using boost::static_vector in one of my classes for that reason. I'm not sure yet exactly how big my array will need to be to accommodate most situations but there are always exceptions...
Instead of discarding the input that would require more space than what my static_vector can store, I would like to fall back on std::vector to handle those exceptions.
A pattern that I commonly use in my classes design, is that I provide its input to the constructor to populate its container, then I provide a getter function that returns a const reference to the inner container.
The possibility that the class might use one or another container is causing a mental blind spot in me.
What would be the best way to offer access to the class elements?
I have come up with few ideas but none are truly satisfactory...
Make my class a container using the proxy/facade pattern I'm too lazy for doing that and this is not practical if I want to apply this static_vector/vector solution everywhere...
Place the burden on the class user ie.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-24 at 17:50What you want is an "abstraction" over both std::vector
and boost::static_vector
, depending on what operations you want to do on the abstraction, you have different possibilities:
If you want const-access to the container, you can simply use a class that would wrap a raw array since both
std::vector
andboost::static_vector
use a raw array internally. Fortunately for you, C++20 already has such class:std::span
(if you don't have C++20, you can use the one from the GSL). This is the preferred option since it is probably completely transparent in term of performance and the interface ofstd::span
is close to the read-only operations ofstd::vector
orboost::static_vector
.If you want more operations (e.g. being able to
push_back
, etc.), you'd need a proper abstraction similar to whatstd::function
does for functor objects, which requires a lot more work:
QUESTION
I already heard that std::vector::iterator
can simply be T*
instead of an iterator class.
But is it really legal?
Pointer arithmetic only applies to array and std::vector
doesn't create array object (T[]
) but contiguous objects (via placement new).
Moreover I think that std::launder
would even be required (C++17) to access individual element (as we can read in comment of static_vector
example of std::aligned_storage
).
I think it is roughly equivalent to following that I think is undefined behavior.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-09 at 13:04std::vector::iterator
is part of the Standard Library, and therefore part of the implementation. That means it may depend on implementation-specific details. In particular, the implementation may use pointer arithmetic in a non-portable way. If the implementation knows a T[]
is indistinguishable from contiguously allocated T's
, then it can do pointer arithmetic on them.
QUESTION
consider the following example of a compile-time "vector".
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-03 at 20:25Specializations must conform to the base template declaration. Since at least one int
is required by the base template, this does not compile.
You can make this work by declaring the template to take any number of int
arguments, then specializing every case that takes one or more arguments. The base declaration is then the empty case:
QUESTION
I am training a custom NER model from scratch using the spacy.blank("en") model. I add custom word vectors to it. The vectors are loaded as follows:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-24 at 00:10You could try to pass all vectors at once instead of using a for loop.
QUESTION
tl;dr: I think my static_vector has undefined behavior, but I can't find it.
This problem is on Microsoft Visual C++ 17. I have this simple and unfinished static_vector implementation, i.e. a vector with a fixed capacity that can be stack allocated. This is a C++17 program, using std::aligned_storage and std::launder. I've tried to boil it down below to the parts that I think are relevant to the issue:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-10 at 10:29I think you have a compiler bug. Adding __declspec( noinline )
to operator[]
seems to fix the crash:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install static_vector
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page