bpftrace | High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
kandi X-RAY | bpftrace Summary
kandi X-RAY | bpftrace Summary
bpftrace is a high-level tracing language for Linux enhanced Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) available in recent Linux kernels (4.x). bpftrace uses LLVM as a backend to compile scripts to BPF-bytecode and makes use of BCC for interacting with the Linux BPF system, as well as existing Linux tracing capabilities: kernel dynamic tracing (kprobes), user-level dynamic tracing (uprobes), and tracepoints. The bpftrace language is inspired by awk and C, and predecessor tracers such as DTrace and SystemTap. bpftrace was created by Alastair Robertson. To learn more about bpftrace, see the Manual the Reference Guide and One-Liner Tutorial.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of bpftrace
bpftrace Key Features
bpftrace Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on bpftrace
QUESTION
What do I want?
To parse the output of the command which basically runs inside a POD
Shell Command:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-01 at 07:56After string "/n" gets added, so I removed the newline using the following to make it work as expected:
QUESTION
Motivation
I'm trying to write a bpftrace program to trace out when a socket is ready for reading by hooking into the kprobe sock_def_readable
. I will get a struct sock
to inspect. I'd like to map it back to the socket I created in user-land.
Question
How does one recover the port number from a struct sock
?
ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-09 at 06:03I just expanded the definition of inet_sk
... which was merely a cast.
QUESTION
I'm attempting to write a single bpftrace script which grab the strings passing from a postfix process and a saslauthd for the authentication part. The goal is detect compromise account of my company. The strace command give me some good results:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-05 at 09:37TL;DR. That's actually the expected behavior of str(buf, len)
. It retrieves the string pointed to by buf
, with a limit to len
characters including the NULL character. Thus, since in your case some strings start with a NULL character, str()
will copy an empty string.
Sources. bpftrace translates str()
into a call to the BPF_FUNC_probe_read_str
BPF helper. In the kernel, that helper itself calls strncpy_from_unsafe
.
I don't think bpftrace already has a function implementing what you're looking for. If you want your described semantics, you could ask for a copy()
function in bpftrace. Though, looking at the commit that introduced str()
, it shouldn't be too hard to write a patch for that. Don't hesitate to send a pull request!
QUESTION
I'm trying to build a tool wherein I attach a BPF program to the entry points for all syscalls. From the CLI, I was able to attach to all syscall entries via
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-03 at 05:55I don't think there's a way to trace all syscalls with a single kprobe attach point via BPF. Instead what you can do is derive the list of all matching krprobe hooks from the given pattern (i.e., sys_enter_*
).
In bcc, there's function called BPF.get_kprobe_functions()
that allows you to do just that. You can see an example usage in bcc's funccount.py
. I'm guessing that bpftrace does something very similar when giving it a pattern.
QUESTION
I've been working on a project for a little while, and the first step is building a library of syscall traces for processes. Essentially, what I'm trying to do is have system wherein every time a process requests an OS service via a syscall, relevant information (calling process, time, syscall name) of the event get logged to a file.
Theoretically, this sounds like a simple enough thing to do, however, implementing such is becoming more of a pain as time goes on. I suppose the main that's causing issues for me is a general lack of knowing where to start implementation.
Initially, I thought that this could all be handled be adding a few lines of code to the kernel entry point, but after digging through entry_64.S for a little while, I came to the conclusion that there must be an easier way. The next idea I had was to overwrite all the services pointed to by sys_call_table with my own service that did logging then called the original service. But, turns out, there are some difficulties to this method with linux kernel 5.4.18 due to sys_call_table no longer being exported. And, even when recompiling the kernel so that sys_call_table is exported, the table is in a memory protected location. Lastly, I've been experimenting with auditd. Specifically, I followed this link but it doesn't seem to be working (when I executed kill command there was is only a corresponding result in ausearch about 50% of time based on timestamps).
I'm getting a little burned out by all these dead-ends, and am really hoping to finally have this first stage in my project up and running. Does anyone have any pointers as to what I should try?
Solution: BPFTrace was exactly what I was looking for.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-13 at 04:17I used BPFTrace to log every time the kernel began execution of a syscall (excluding those initiated by BPFTrace itself)
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install bpftrace
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page