elfparser | Cross Platform ELF analysis | Reverse Engineering library

by jacob-baines C++ Version: 1.4.0 License: Non-SPDX

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(1)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | elfparser Summary

elfparser is a C++ library typically used in Utilities, Reverse Engineering applications. elfparser has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However elfparser has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

Cross Platform ELF analysis

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

elfparser has a low active ecosystem.

It has 328 star(s) with 84 fork(s). There are 23 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 2 open issues and 2 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 0 days. There are 1 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of elfparser is 1.4.0

Quality

elfparser has no bugs reported.

Security

elfparser has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

elfparser has a Non-SPDX License.

Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

Reuse

elfparser releases are available to install and integrate.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of elfparser

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

elfparser Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for elfparser.

elfparser Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for elfparser.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on elfparser

In a DWARF file, what's the difference between .debug_str and .strtab?

QUESTION

In a DWARF file, what's the difference between .debug_str and .strtab?

Asked 2017-Jan-06 at 16:38

I'm working with DWARF parser that looks for string data in the .debug_str section. In the ELF files I'm parsing, the string data is in the .strtab section. What's the difference between these two sections? Both contain strings, right?

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Jan-06 at 16:38

What's the difference between these two sections?

They have ~nothing to do with each other.

Both contain strings, right?

Well, yes. And every section contains bytes, so next you'll be asking "what's the difference between .text and .data?".

The .debug_str section contains debug strings, which are needed for debugging. The .strtab section contains symbol names which are needed for (static) linking.

Neither section (in fact no section) is needed at runtime.

why .strtab is present in final executable linked with -g (even though it won't be used for static linking anymore)?

The .strtab is usually present in final executable built with or without -g and
It's present to help with debugging. Consider:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41495151

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install elfparser

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

Please report any issues, bugs, or feature requests on Github or contact me at admin@elfparser.com. Feel free to submit pull requests or email patches.

Find more information at: