wallClockProfiler | A wall-clock stack-sampling profiler
kandi X-RAY | wallClockProfiler Summary
kandi X-RAY | wallClockProfiler Summary
wallClockProfiler is a C++ library. wallClockProfiler has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However wallClockProfiler has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.
Sadly, this is apparently the ONLY profiler on Linux that actually works. By "actually works," I mean that a profiler is supposed to give you a rough estimate where your program is spending the most time. Slow programs are slow for a variety of reasons, not just because of inefficient algorithms that waste CPU cycles. Lots of programs are I/O bound. If you profile such a program, you want to know where the I/O hotspots are, and you don't care where the CPU hotspots are, because they are tiny, by comparison. As far as I can tell, after way too many hours of researching and testing every available tool, there is nothing on Linux that actually does this well. I had a simple test program, written in C++, that looped over a big file on disk, fseeking randomly and reading from the file a bunch of times. Obviously, such a program is spending almost all of its time in fseek. But not a single existing profiler would tell me this. Not perf. Not gperftools. Not OProfile. Obviously not gprof. None of the usual suspects. Some of them were telling me that a good portion of the running time was spent in rand (which was used to pick the random offset to fseek to). The truth was, this was only about 1% of the simple program's wall-clock runtime. If I want to speed this program up, optimizing rand is going to be a waste of time. Valgrind's callgrind can provide better results than the others, but it makes the program 10x slower (or something like that), so it's useless in production environments (for example, profiling a live server that has real users connecting to it).
Sadly, this is apparently the ONLY profiler on Linux that actually works. By "actually works," I mean that a profiler is supposed to give you a rough estimate where your program is spending the most time. Slow programs are slow for a variety of reasons, not just because of inefficient algorithms that waste CPU cycles. Lots of programs are I/O bound. If you profile such a program, you want to know where the I/O hotspots are, and you don't care where the CPU hotspots are, because they are tiny, by comparison. As far as I can tell, after way too many hours of researching and testing every available tool, there is nothing on Linux that actually does this well. I had a simple test program, written in C++, that looped over a big file on disk, fseeking randomly and reading from the file a bunch of times. Obviously, such a program is spending almost all of its time in fseek. But not a single existing profiler would tell me this. Not perf. Not gperftools. Not OProfile. Obviously not gprof. None of the usual suspects. Some of them were telling me that a good portion of the running time was spent in rand (which was used to pick the random offset to fseek to). The truth was, this was only about 1% of the simple program's wall-clock runtime. If I want to speed this program up, optimizing rand is going to be a waste of time. Valgrind's callgrind can provide better results than the others, but it makes the program 10x slower (or something like that), so it's useless in production environments (for example, profiling a live server that has real users connecting to it).
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Support
wallClockProfiler has a low active ecosystem.
It has 23 star(s) with 4 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
It had no major release in the last 6 months.
There are 3 open issues and 3 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 340 days. There are no pull requests.
It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
The latest version of wallClockProfiler is current.
Quality
wallClockProfiler has no bugs reported.
Security
wallClockProfiler has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
License
wallClockProfiler has a Non-SPDX License.
Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.
Reuse
wallClockProfiler releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of wallClockProfiler
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of wallClockProfiler
wallClockProfiler Key Features
No Key Features are available at this moment for wallClockProfiler.
wallClockProfiler Examples and Code Snippets
No Code Snippets are available at this moment for wallClockProfiler.
Community Discussions
No Community Discussions are available at this moment for wallClockProfiler.Refer to stack overflow page for discussions.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install wallClockProfiler
You can download it from GitHub.
Support
For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub.
If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
Find more information at:
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page