mexplus | C++ Matlab MEX development kit
kandi X-RAY | mexplus Summary
kandi X-RAY | mexplus Summary
C++ Matlab MEX development kit. The kit contains a couple of C++ classes and macros to make MEX development easy in Matlab. There are 3 major components in the development kit. All classes are located in mexplus namespace, and you can use all of them by including the mexplus.h header file. The library depends on a few C++11 features, and might not be compatible with older compilers. For older g++, make sure to add -std=c++11 flag at compile time, or in the CXXFLAGS variable in the MEX options located at $HOME/.matlab/$VERSION/mexopts.sh, or in Matlab R2014a or later, at $HOME/.matlab/$VERSION/mex_C++_$ARCH.xml.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of mexplus
mexplus Key Features
mexplus Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on mexplus
QUESTION
I am writing a mex function for Matlab and noticed a warning from Visual Studio 2017 during compilation. After virtually erasing everything but includes and the bare wrapper for mex-functions, I had to come to the conclusion that the warning is really pointing at the library itself:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Aug-24 at 23:03You can safely ignore this.
Here's a nice description of why a loop might be written this way From http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/size_t:
std::size_t is commonly used for array indexing and loop counting. Programs that use other types, such as unsigned int, for array indexing may fail on, e.g. 64-bit systems when the index exceeds UINT_MAX or if it relies on 32-bit modular arithmetic.
The actual value of size_t
, the maximum amount of memory allocatable, is going to be system dependent. The compiler looks to be casting the 0 (in i = 0
) to an int
and then throwing the warning, because it just reduced your usable range by half (i.e. instead of an unsigned int
).
In practice though, i
can probably still index up to a value of 2^32 (this is where it gets platform dependent), and you are probably not going to be dealing with structures having that many field names.
Might this warning actually point to an error in my configuration file?
I don't think so.
Can I safely ignore this?
Yes.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install mexplus
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page