clang-tools-extra | Mirror kept for legacy | Compiler library
kandi X-RAY | clang-tools-extra Summary
kandi X-RAY | clang-tools-extra Summary
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// // Clang Tools repository //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//. Welcome to the repository of extra Clang Tools. This repository holds tools that are developed as part of the LLVM compiler infrastructure project and the Clang frontend. These tools are kept in a separate "extra" repository to allow lighter weight checkouts of the core Clang codebase. This repository is only intended to be checked out inside of a full LLVM+Clang tree, and in the 'tools/extra' subdirectory of the Clang checkout. All discussion regarding Clang, Clang-based tools, and code in this repository should be held using the standard Clang mailing lists: Code review for this tree should take place on the standard Clang patch and commit lists: If you find a bug in these tools, please file it in the LLVM bug tracker:
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of clang-tools-extra
clang-tools-extra Key Features
clang-tools-extra Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on clang-tools-extra
QUESTION
Although High Sierra is no longer supported by Homebrew, but I need to install llvm@13
formula as a dependency for other formulas. So I tried to install it this way:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-26 at 08:27Install llvm with debug mode enabled:
QUESTION
llvm-project says that it does not currently support pull requests and asks one to use https://reviews.llvm.org/ Now, I would like to submit my patch for this file. How would one proceed?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-30 at 20:58You should start small with something like a typo to get a feel for the submission and code review process. There is the My First Typo Fix doc for this. Also, watch the How to Contribute to LLVM tutorial from the 2019 Developer Meeting. You will also need reviewers. The LLVM Discord channel, git blame and the LLVM code owners can help here. Lastly, or maybe even firstly, you could post an RFC on the LLVM developers email list.
QUESTION
Given the cppcoreguidelines-interfaces-global-init, specifically "initializing non-local variable with non-const expression depending on uninitialized non-local variable", which is exemplified here, I have the following scenario:
- My team consists of 4 dev
- We all have the same environment: VS2015
- Everybody has the same VS project options
- Our hardware is slightly different.
Then, I found a local static
like below where the warning above ends up on a bad initialization.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-25 at 00:03The static initialization order fiasco, from which you are suffering, occurs when an object in one translation unit may rely on the data from another unit that has not yet been, or is in the process of being, initialized.
Dynamic initialization of static
members across translation-units are indeterminately sequenced with respect to all other translation-units. There is no guarantee to the order in which they get initialized, or even if they are on the same thread.
There are a few possible conditions I can think of that may result in you experiencing it while others are not. Factors like hardware, link-order, timing, etc. may all play a role. Some possible cases:
Since dynamic-initialization is indeterminately sequenced and not guaranteed to even exist in the same thread, if initialization is multi-threaded on startup, then differing hardware may introduce different initialization timing (race-condition)
It could just be that there is a difference in your development environment on your system. Something as small as having a library found in a different location may disrupt the library load-order, which may affect the order in which things are initialized.
Assuming your system is performing parallel-compilation, it's possible that your hardware is compiling objects in a different order, which has affected the order these objects get linked in. The link-order may change initialization order -- which may cause you to experience an issue where someone else doesn't.
Ultimately, why you are experiencing this when others are not doesn't actually matter. Formally, you are experiencing undefined behavior, and how it behaves and who it discriminates against cannot be reasoned about.
Note: Without a lot more information about your system setup, the best that can be provided is guesswork as to why this is occurring.
QUESTION
I succesfully checked-out llvm (v12) project and built llvm+clang invoking:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-07 at 12:59Find the list of targets in the output of ninja help
or make help
or xcodebuild -list
or any other generator.
A project's external name can very well be different from the internal target name.
If you want to build everything, just set the install prefix:
cmake -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;clang-tools-extra" ../llvm -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../my_install
and run make install
It will do the right thing.
QUESTION
I'm bringing to your attention a question I tackled with for a few days and no issue could solve for me, in the hope that it'll save some other people time.
I try to compile LLVM from sources on macOS Catalina (10.15).
To do so, I used the following commands (after following the LLVM build manual):
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-22 at 20:37Since macOS Catalina, the /usr
folder is been mounted as a read-only directory, so even as a root - no one has permission to modify this folder (well, unless you reboot in SIP mode, which's obviously not a considerable solution).
The entire toolchain is saved by default under /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk
. You can get your path by executing xcrun --show-sdk-path
. I'll assume that you do have the default path in my answer but please adjust as needed.
Running clang
with the -v
flag gave me the following:
QUESTION
So,This is how I did build LLVM
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-24 at 08:37You have to specify clang
in the LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS
CMake variable as described in the getting started guide.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install clang-tools-extra
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page