MaidSafe | MaidSafe library resides | Hacking library

TL;DR: https://codesandbox.io/s/62wvro7083

I solved this with my own little data store, its a very simple approach but works good enough for me without the necessity to dive into Vuex.

First, I create my data store somewhere before initializing anything else.

The eval() errror is not coming from webpack-dev-server.

It turns out that the the default source map mode used by @neutrinojs/web which @neutrinojs/web inherits from is cheap-module-eval-source-map and needs to be set to cheap-module-source-map.

Thus neutrinorc.js needs to be configured as such:

While ref, ref-struct and ref-array are powerful, but fragile things, their combination can behave really obscure.

There are two nuances with your sample:

1. Calling makeAccessContainerEntry twice overwrites your global cache - CStrings cached (global.x0 and global.x1) during the makeAuthGrantedFfiStruct call will be overwritten by the second directmakeAccessContainerEntry call.

2. It seems that you should cache each ContainerInfoArray too.

This code should work fine:

:: is the scope resolution operator. The name on the left-hand side denotes a scope; it can be either a namespace name or a class name. The name on the right-hand side denotes a member of that scope.

In your case, there seems to be a class maidsafe::crux::detail::service, which contains a static member id of type boost::asio::io_service::id. In many cases, static members need an out-of-class definition, which is being provided by the code you've posted.

It can be parsed as any other C++ declaration: it declares something named service::id of type boost::asio::io_service::id. Let's look at the individual components.

Type:

• boost is a namespace (in global scope)
• asio is a namespace inside boost
• io_service is either a namespace or class inside boost::asio
• id is a type inside boost::asio::io_service

Name:

• service is a class name (probably inside namespace maidsafe::crux::detail)
• id is a static member inside maidsafe::crux::detail::service.

Addendum

While it does not appear in this question, there's a related syntax you may sometimes encounter in more modern C++ code: