LiveCamera | Network Video Monitoring System Based on QT
kandi X-RAY | LiveCamera Summary
kandi X-RAY | LiveCamera Summary
Network Video Monitoring System Based on QT
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of LiveCamera
LiveCamera Key Features
LiveCamera Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on LiveCamera
QUESTION
I'm having a simple websocket server that's supposed to feed camera frames to an electron application. The code is mostly taken from here. The idea is that when I open the websocket, python will start a while loop that continuously sends frames that will be captured by the js 'client'. However, in order to be able to stop this while loop I need to run this method on an executor, because otherwise it'll get stuck in it. The loop is supposed to run as long as an event is not set and this event is being set on on_close method of the websocket.
I made a separate method that simulates the camera, in the actual app the frames are coming from another process.
The problem is that after running the program after a while my logs are flooded by: ERROR:asyncio:Task was destroyed but it is pending!
My assumption is that there are some synchronization issues between the main ioloop and executors loop. I have also tried starting/stopping a thread that sends frames when opening/closing the websocket but got the same issue...
here is my code:
ws_server.py
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-07 at 00:40Don't create new event loops in the executor thread.
write_message
must be called from the same event loop thread that is handling the connection. That means that if you're using an executor, you must pass messages back and forth between the executor and the event loop, so that you can do your blocking tasks on the executor and write your websocket messages on the event loop. Creating a new event loop in the executor will bypass the errors about there not being an event loop in the thread, but it's incorrect - the point of those warnings is that you must use the same event loop, not create a new one.
In practice, I recommend doing as much as possible on the event loop thread and only passing specific pieces of blocking work to the executor:
QUESTION
I'm making a web project in .net for face authentication, when the face gets matched, both the images(captured and matched) are to be displayed in a div and along with that there should be confidence score to be populated.
Based on confident score, the authentications should be done.
Currently my problem is, the authentication is done fine, but the images are displayed blank and also the confidence score is displayed blank. I need to pop in the images and the confidence score into my webpage.
Below is my CSHTML
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Feb-01 at 09:06The AJAX call to FindSimilarImages
will set the Session variables on the server side, but that has no effect on the client-side AJAX success
function where you are trying to use those values. The success
function is rendered to the browser only once, before the FindSimilarImages
call happens, and so the Session values used during rendering is what will be used until the page is reloaded.
The solution would be to have FindSimilarImages
return a JSON datastructure that not only contains "MATCHFOUND" but also the URL of the image and the Score, and then use both from the data
object inside the success
function.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install LiveCamera
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page