nBlock | content filtering , network/ad blocking ecap adapter | Privacy library
kandi X-RAY | nBlock Summary
kandi X-RAY | nBlock Summary
A network-wide web content filtering & blocking eCAP adapter for Squid. nBlock Aims to replace all sorts of privacy enhancing browser plugins like AdBlock Plus, Decentraleyes, Self-Destructing Cookies and fills the content filtering gaps that come with DNS only filters like Pi-Hole. Please read the installation instructions on how to set up your own instance of nBlock.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of nBlock
nBlock Key Features
nBlock Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on nBlock
QUESTION
So far I have written programs where a kernel is called only once in the program
So I have a kernel
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 12:37Additional synchronization would not be necessary in this case for at least 2 reasons.
cudaMemcpy
is a synchronizing call already. It blocks the CPU thread and waits until all previous CUDA activity issued to that device is complete, before it allows the data transfer to begin. Once the data transfer is complete, the CPU thread is allowed to proceed.CUDA activity issued to a single device will not overlap in any way unless using CUDA streams. You are not using streams. Therefore even asynchronous work issued to the device will execute in issue order. Item A and B issued to the device in that order will not overlap with each other. Item A will complete before item B is allowed to begin. This is a principal CUDA streams semantic point.
QUESTION
I have a number (say a million) of small matrices 4 x 3. I would like to do several simple operations with them and I would like my CUDA kernel to parallelize the matrices index only, (not the row/column operations). Let me explain better: I pass as an input to my GPU Kernel an array of matrices A[MatrixNumb][row][col] and I would like operation parallelization to be only on the MatrixNumb (therefore I want to force the operation in one dimension. The example below is with 3 Matrices only, for simplicity. It compiles and runs, however it gives me the wrong results. Basically, it returns the same matrices I give it as an input. I cannot understand why and if I am making any mistake, how can I re-write/think the code? I wrote the code using also CudaMallocManaged, in order to have shared memory between host and device, however it gives me the same results using the classic CudaMalloc and using memcpy.
Source.cpp
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-19 at 01:37You had a several issues:
- When using managed memory with double or triple pointer access, every pointer in the tree must be allocated using a managed allocator
- Your allocation schemes had too many levels, and you were allocating some pointers twice (memory leak).
- The order of arguments you are passing to your kernel does not match the order of arguments your kernel expects (
n
,m
were backwards). - Since you are potentially launching more blocks/threads than necessary, your kernel requires a thread check (if-test).
- Your code should be in a
.cu
file, not a.cpp
file.
The following code has the above issues addressed, and seems to run without runtime error.
QUESTION
I am trying to use memcpy
C library function to swap rows of 2D array(array of strings). Source files for this task is below:
main.c
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-03 at 13:34You are not allowed to modify string literals. For more information, see c - Why do I get a segmentation fault when writing to a "char *s" initialized with a string literal, but not "char s[]"?.
You can modify values of pointers to swap rows.
QUESTION
I have been working on this scraper for a while and I think it could be improved but I'm not sure where to go from here.
The initial scraper looks like this and I believe it does everything I need it to do:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-25 at 21:48if the length of your list is the problem, why not using :
QUESTION
I am trying to count the number of times curand_uniform() returns 1.0. However i cant seem to get the following code to work for me:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-08 at 20:26This line:
QUESTION
Program
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-09 at 07:22Check the encoding your files (Status Bar) and the project (Settings | Editor | File Encodings) have.
Try adding -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8
into Help | Edit Custom VM Options file and restart IDE.
Also check that the console has Font set (Settings (Preferences on macOS) | Editor | Color Scheme | Console Font) which is capable to display all the glyphs.
QUESTION
This is mostly from the book "Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach."
The book states that groups of 32 threads are grouped and executed together in what's called the thread block, but shows an example with a function call that has 256 threads per thread block, and CUDA's documentation states that you can have a maximum of 512 threads per thread block.
The function call looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-13 at 02:52The question is a little unclear in my opinion. I will highlight a difference between thread warps and thread blocks that I find important in hopes that it helps answer whatever the true question is.
The number of threads per warp is defined by the hardware. Often, a thread warp is 32 threads wide (NVIDIA) because the SIMD unit on the GPU has exactly 32 lanes of execution, each with its own ALU (this is not always the case as far as I know; some architectures have only 16 lanes even though thread warps are 32 wide).
The size of a thread block is user defined (although, constrained by the hardware). The hardware will still execute thread code in 32-wide thread warps. Some GPU resources, such as shared memory and synchronization, cannot be shared arbitrarily between any two threads on the GPU. However, the GPU will allow threads to share a larger subset of resources if they belong to the same thread block. That's the main idea behind why thread blocks are used.
QUESTION
Hello everyone I'm trying to use grid-stride method and atomic functions to do multi-block reduction.
I know that the usual way to do this is to launch two kernels or use lastblock method as directed in this note.(or this tutorial)
However, I thought this could also be done by using grid-stride with atomic code.
As I tested, it worked very well..
until for some number, it gives the wrong answer. (which is very weird)
I have tested for some "n"s and found that I get wrong answer for n = 1234565, 1234566, 1234567.
This is my whole code of doing n sum of 1. So the answer should be n.
Any help or comment is appreciated.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-01 at 07:42You have gotten quite a lot wrong in your implementation. This will work:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-14 at 05:06Assuming you are referring to the following snippet:
QUESTION
I need help with C parallel programming, from this graph: graph image
I wrote this code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-01 at 12:40 is buffered, see stdio(3) and setvbuf(3). You should call fflush(3) at appropriate places, in particular before fork(2).
BTW, the code of your standard libc is free software, probably GNU glibc. Of course it uses syscalls(2). So you should study its source code.
Read also How to debug small programsCommunity Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install nBlock
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page