rotor | Simple axisymmetric rotor disk
kandi X-RAY | rotor Summary
kandi X-RAY | rotor Summary
Simple axisymmetric rotor disk.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of rotor
rotor Key Features
rotor Examples and Code Snippets
def enigma(
text: str,
rotor_position: RotorPositionT,
rotor_selection: RotorSelectionT = (rotor1, rotor2, rotor3),
plugb: str = "",
) -> str:
"""
The only difference with real-world enigma is that I allowed string input.
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on rotor
QUESTION
I am working on a code that encrypts messages. First of all, I apply Ceasar shift like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 19:01If the type char
behaves as the type signed char then the minimum and maximum values that can be stored in an object of the type can be obtained the following way
QUESTION
For a project I have, I control a BLDC motor with it's own current controller.
To design a controller for the motor I fitted some time traces to the flowing function:
to capture the dynamics of the entire system, namely, motor, current controller/driver and load.
J is the rotor inertia, [kg*m^2]
r a dampening constant (linear friction)
tau is a torque constant [Nm/A]
u[t] a current input
der(der(phi)) is the angular acceleration
der(phi) the angular velocity
The fitted values represent the entire system more than good enough for a 'continuous' approximation of the motor, the load and the current controller/driver of the motor. With the control scheme, I give a signal u(t) in Amps, and I expect a torque and an angular velocity as an output. At the time I only needed the angular velocity, but I digress, this method worked fantastically, but was fitted and designed in mathematica.
I would like to build a much larger, and significantly more complex robotic system within modelica (Systemmodeler specifcally, however, modelica library 3.2.x), however I am having some issues.
My first attempt was:
However, when simulating this with another outside load (an external model), I have a lot of issues, from some those more experienced than I, I am told this form of modelling is 'one way' and not the 'modelica method' but more simulink in form.
Namely, it should be bi-directional, not just numerical outputs, in order to correctly react with the multibody external model, this will connect to.
My second attempt was:
Which when connecting to my larger multibody model, it does indeed work more like it's expected to, there is a reaction from this model, when external torques/loads are applied. However, when simulating this model to see how it fairs compared to the pure block model, they arn't the same by any means. I had to spend a lot of time trying to fit the inertia and friction data to get similar results.
SO my question is, what is the best method, to turn pure block models (mathematical ones) or atleast,my pure block model, into a more realistic model or atleast, the connecting outputs into more realistic, or I guess 'acasual' ones.
I would prefer not to use my second attempt, since I can't trust the values I had to adjust compared to the block to actually be correct, since they arn't fitted values to real world data, compared to my first model.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-17 at 05:56Difficult to answer in general. Basically you need to understand which model corresponds to which part of the system/equation you want to model and then combine them to result in the same overall behavior.
The original model/equation seems consist of (correct me if I'm misunderstanding the equation):
- An inertia corresponding to
J * dot(dot(phi))
- A linear friction model corresponding to
r * dot(phi)
- A torque resulting from an input multiplied with a constant (in this case likely a torque constant multiplied by a input current) corresponding to
tau * u(t)
If you don't know the components I think there is no way besides investing time into understanding the Modelica code or at least the documentation of each component.
I would use the following components to describe the behavior
Modelica.Mechanics.Rotational.Components.Inertia
Modelica.Mechanics.Rotational.Components.Damper
- This can be done combining
Modelica.Blocks.Math.Gain
andModelica.Mechanics.Rotational.Sources.Torque
As an extension I would suggest to use the physical quantity (current) as an input. This can be done by changing the model to:
Extending the model with two more meaningful components (Resistance and Inductance as asked for in the first comment) results in:
Note: The model is actually a 1~ representation of a 3~ motor. I think the parameters for terminal resistance/inductance should still be valid, but I would strongly suggest to validate the model by e.g. computing speeds at no-load operation and nominal load.
In case you need the code from which the above screenshots were generated (using MSL 4.0.0):
QUESTION
Link : https://www.codechef.com/LRNDSA01/problems/LAPIN
Program description : Lapindrome is defined as a string which when split in the middle, gives two halves having the same characters and same frequency of each character. If there are odd number of characters in the string, we ignore the middle character and check for lapindrome. For example gaga is a lapindrome, since the two halves ga and ga have the same characters with same frequency. Also, abccab, rotor and xyzxy are a few examples of lapindromes. Note that abbaab is NOT a lapindrome. The two halves contain the same characters but their frequencies do not match. Your task is simple. Given a string, you need to tell if it is a lapindrome.
My code :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-01 at 15:00The algorithm you implemented is both incorrect and very slow (even if it was correct). Since the input characters are limited to a..z, you could implement a fast algorithm by comparing the frequencies of letters in the left and right portions of the input text. An example implementation is below. The code assumes that the character codes of a..z are contiguous, which isn't guaranteed by the C standard.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-14 at 12:28it seems that my custom view is ignored as container.
Apparently, only native elements may be recognized as containers for the rotor.🤨
I tried by creating an UIAccessibilityElement
inside a view defined as its container with an accessibilityContainerType
but no results.🤯
I never use the rotor with the container item but this issue has aroused my curiosity. 🤓
I looked into this problem and found out an interesting answer that highlights the same a11y trait value for all the native containers... those that are analyzed by VoiceOver as such at least.
Override the trait value of your specific containers as follows for instance:
QUESTION
I'm a "noob" Java student who is trying to complete the next problem, it's about finding palindromes. I've tried to do it but i can't get the solution! As I said I'm "noob", I only use the "standard" public class, I don't know how to explain it, but I'm still learning, so I don't know even how the functions work, you can make it complex, but not too complex xD. Here it is, thank you people:
A palindrome is a word that is typed the same way from left to right and also from right to left, for example: Y, EE, ALA, ANNA, ROTOR or AAAAAA
Ask a word to the user and identify if it is a palindrome or not, and also show how many diferent palindromes the word has inside.
...I/O examples:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-03 at 16:32This is not best perfomance solution, but this is intuitive clear.
QUESTION
I have a docstring in the beginning of every module describing its usage and functionality. Here I also want to add the most relevant parameters - like settings in a parameter file or via command line arguments. It's no classical function parameters since the module might be called as stand-alone as well (via if __name__ == '__main__'
capture). But since the ordinary parameter formatting of Sphinx is neat I want to just re-use it.
However, Sphinx seems to handle the "Parameter" section differently when in a module compared to when in a function.
This is how they are formatted differently:
Parameters in function docstring: Parameters in module docstring:You see the difference. In functions the keyword "Parameters" is added and then we have a nice bullet list. In modules no title is created, no list, the type is not set in braces but on an additional line etc.
Docstring format is the same (numpydoc):
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-07 at 05:06The style used to render the docstring sections is dependent on the HTML theme you are using with Sphinx.
Does anyone have an idea why it's handled like this?
The reason the styles are different for module and function docstrings, is because it's customary to use a command-line syntax style to document scripts that is different from function signature syntax style . Notice the style you showed for the module docstring is similar to a list of command-line arguments.
I would like the parameters in modules output in the same way as in functions.
Different themes may render module docstrings similarly or differently from function and classe docstrings. You would have to choose a different theme or customize the theme's CSS by copying the style used for functions to the style used for module docstrings.
the type is not set in braces but on an additional line etc.
This is noteworthy because you would expect the napoleon-sphinx extension to not render type and name on different lines as if it were using classic reST syntax instead of Google style or Numpy.
I would recommend trying a different HTML theme or setting the napoleon_use_param
, napoleon_use_ivar
and napoleon_use_rtype
explicitly to see if there's a difference.
And what I can do about it?
The examples given for Google style or Numpy style suggest using docstring sections but that's somewhat oversimplified because command-line style syntax is better illustrated and automated by the way argparse
implements it. There are a few extensions meant to ease and automate the process of documenting scripts.
As for the difference in style I wouldn't worry about it (admittedly in the HTML theme you are currently using it doesn't look very good). A command-line invocation of a script or a run-time call of a function are different and accordingly themes may and will render those docstrings sections with visual differences.
QUESTION
- Icing of the engine and the leading edges of the intake duct can occur during flight through clouds containing supercooled water droplets or during ground operation in freezing fog. Protection against ice formation may be required since icing of these regions can considerably restrict the airflow through the engine, causing a loss in performance and possible malfunction of the engine. Additionally, damage may result from ice breaking away and being ingested into the engine or hitting the acoustic material lining the intake duct. 147 2. An ice protection system must effectively prevent ice formation within the operational requirements of the particular aircraft. The system must be reliable, easy to maintain, present no excessive weight penalty and cause no serious loss in engine performance when in operation. 3. Analyses are carried out to determine whether ice protection is required and, if so, the heat input required to limit ice build up to acceptable levels. Fig. 13-1 illustrates the areas of a turbo-fan engine typically considered for ice protection. 4. There are two basic systems of ice protection; turbo-jet engines generally use a hot air supply (fig. 13-2), and turbo-propeller engines use electrical power or a combination of electrical power and hot Ice protection Fig. 13-1 Areas t picall considered for ice protection. Fig. 13- Hot air ice protection. 148 149 Ice protection air. Protection may be supplemented by the circulation of hot oil around the air intake as shown in fig. 13-3. The hot air system is generally used to prevent the formation of ice and is known as an anti- icing system. The electrical power system is used to break up ice that has formed on surfaces and is known as a de-icing system. HOT AIR SYSTEM 5. The hot air system provides surface heating of the engine and/or powerplant where ice is likely to form. The protection of rotor blades is rarely necessary, because any ice accretions are dispersed by centrifugal action. If stators are fitted upstream of the first rotating compressor stage these may require 149 Ice protection protection. If the nose cone rotates it may not need anti-icing if its shape, construction and rotational characteristics are such that likely icing is acceptable. 6. The hot air for the anti-icing system is usually taken from the high pressure compressor stages. It is ducted through pressure regulating valves, to the parts requiring anti-icing. Spent air from the nose cowl anti-icing system may be exhausted into the compressor intake or vented overboard.
How can I use regex to get 1. , 2. ... I tried using this but to no avail ^\d..*(?=\d.), it gives me everything
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-27 at 13:03QUESTION
I'm trying to do a 301 redirect using the IIS URL rewrite module. I've googled, looked at videos and put in different settings but it does nothing...meaning, the link I set up the redirect on still just works as before. I don't even get an error.
Here are my settings:
- Requested URL: Matches the pattern
- Using: Regular expressions << I've tried 'exact match' as well...same result, didn't work.
- Pattern: Turf/ProductView.cfm?P=151
- Ignore Case: checked
- Action type: redirect
- Redirect URL: https://www.weathermatic.com/products/6000-pro-rotors/{R:0}
- Redirect Type: permanent 301
I've also tried using a Redirect URL that was within the same domain as the link I'm trying to redirect...again, nothing happens, the link still just works as before and no errors either.
Any help is so much appreciated.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-25 at 09:46Query string is not included in Match URL and? have different meaning in regex expression.
Please use {REUEST_URI} and \? instead.
QUESTION
I am trying to do a risk matrix using Python that integrate severity and probability, I already tried using heatmaps, and it is maybe the closest kind of graph I have found so far, but I think it does not represent the basic structure of a risk matrix. The next image shows the kind of matrix graph I want. I would appreciate any recommendation: library, link...whatever to be able to graph a risk matrix.
This is the data I am trying to locate inside the risk matrix:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-02 at 19:56Here is an idea with plt.imshow, and plt.annotate:
QUESTION
sub f()
{
gather
{
take gather { take 3; take 4; take 5; }
take gather { take 1; take 2; take 3; }
}
}
say f.sort
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-21 at 17:31The problem seems to be in your take gather
construct. It puts (still open) Seq
s inside your big outer Seq
. I "fixed" your code by substituting take gather
by take my @x = gather
and everything worked as you wish, I think.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install rotor
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page