RANS | RANS : Library & Tools , Implementation of ANS | Data Visualization library

WARP was the cause of the problem. Issue started after disabling the app. Disabling and reboot or enabling the app resolved the issue.

made the code for the toggle you probably don't need that. The main part is the fade-out animation:

Your issue is, that you think that you change a function's signature by setting foo.__signature__. However, this is not what's happening. It is equally useless to set it to foo.signature or foo.any_other_name. You just set a signature object to the respective property of the function, which changes nothing with regards to the function's behaviour. The only thing that __signature__ does is to change the behaviour of inspect.signature(), since it will return the signature of the function as stored in function.__signature__ iff it is set. I.e. the only thing, that __signature__ changes is the behaviour of inspect.signature(), but not the function itself. See ekhumoro's comment for the link to the appropriate PEP.

As for the type error: In foo() b is not a kwarg-only argument:

It seems like there is a problem with your array. It's created dynamically and has conflicts with UICollectionView's implementation.

Try replacing your array with the following static array.

this way of writing Tailwind CSS classes is not recommended. Even JIT mode doesn't support it, to quote Tailwind CSS docs: "Tailwind doesn’t include any sort of client-side runtime, so class names need to be statically extractable at build-time, and can’t depend on any sort of arbitrary dynamic values that change on the client"

We had the same error. Finally solved it by using a JSON Web Token for authentication per Google's Quckstart. Like so:

Textblob library uses Google API for translation functionality in the backend. Google has made some changes in the its API recently. Due to this reason TextBlob's translation feature has stopped working. I noticed that by making some minor changes in translate.py file (in your folder where all TextBlob files are located) as mentioned below, we can get rid of this error:

original code:

That's expected, considering the way strace is implemented, i.e. via the ptrace(2) system call: every time the traced process performs a system call or gets a signal, the process is forcefully stopped and the control is passed to the tracing process, which in the case of strace does all the unpacking & printing synchronously, i.e. while keeping the traced process stopped. That's the kind of path which increases any emulation overhead exponentially.

It would be instructive to strace strace itself -- you will see that does not let the traced process continue (with ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL, ...)) until it has processed & written out everything related to the current system call.

Notice that in order to run a "trivial" sleep 1 command, the dynamic linker will perform a couple dozen system calls before even getting to the entry point of the sleep binary.

I don't think that optimizing strace is worth spending time on; if you were planning to run strace as an auditing instead of a debugging tool (by running production tasks under strace or similar), you should reconsider your designs ;-)

I was able to get about 25 % faster by combining the three processes.