type_name | C type_name template utilities for pretty-printing type | 3D Printing library

You can use match to get the minute value where type_name is 'substitution' and subtract it with every minute value.

I suggest modeling a relationship as an aggregate (different kinds of relationships might be different aggregates or you might just have Relationship be an aggregate); since the relationships are between things between aggregates in different bounded contexts, this is probably going to be its own bounded context.

The aggregate is basically just holding references (by ID, not references in the programming language sense) to the roots of the related aggregates (if the relationship is free-form in terms of what can be related, these IDs would also encode the type of aggregate).

It bears noting that as we're crossing bounded contexts (which generally could conceivably start operating at network distance from each other), it's reasonably likely that some level of eventual consistency will come into play: I'd advise against trying to enforce strong foreign key-style constraints on the relationships unless you're absolutely sure that you'll never run bounded contexts at network distance from each other (and make it clear that this relationship bounded context will prevent that from being done).

library slider is helpful in these cases

you are trying to add to MySQL bs4 tag:

I think this may serve your purpose to some extent. However, there is some error at calculation of closeness(?) which needs to be taken care of.

Django will only query the DB when necessary, so the results of a query or a Model instance are kept until they are updated from the database. To do this, either run the query again and reassign the Model instances or refresh the Model with the method Model.refresh_from_db().

The code property is not being stored in the database, it is computed dynamically during the method call. To reevaluate its result you must call the property instead of assigning to it. The error occurs because you are assigning a value to a class property.

Here is a tidyverse solution that you can also use:

Here is a data.table approach. Probably not the fastest, but it will get the job done.

You can't. That's the whole point of MutexGuard: if you could take the data out of the MutexGuard, then you would be able to make a reference that can be accessed without locking the mutex, defeating the whole purpose of having a mutex in the first place.

Depending on what you really want to do, one of the following solutions might apply to you:

• Most of the time, you don't need to take the data out of the mutex: MutexGuard implements Deref and DerefMut, so you can use the MutexGuard everywhere you would use a &T or a &mut T. Note that if you change your code to call print_type_of(&*array) instead of print_type_of(&array), it will print the inner type.

• If you really need to, you can take the data out of the Mutex itself (but not the MutexGuard) with into_inner, which consumes the mutex, ensuring that no one else can ever access it: