sexec | Execute commands on remote machines in parallel | Command Line Interface library

by xiaosuo C++ Version: Current License: GPL-2.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(3)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | sexec Summary

sexec is a C++ library typically used in Utilities, Command Line Interface applications. sexec has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Strong Copyleft License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

Execute commands on remote machines in parallel securely.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

sexec has a low active ecosystem.

It has 8 star(s) with 4 fork(s). There are 1 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 2 open issues and 0 have been closed. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of sexec is current.

Quality

sexec has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

sexec has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

sexec code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

sexec is licensed under the GPL-2.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.

Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

Reuse

sexec releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of sexec

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

sexec Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for sexec.

sexec Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for sexec.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on sexec

Jenkins Windows Execute Command Line BitVise sexec Fails with exit 1000 at the end

Jenkins parameter Release versus Staging

Generator function (yield) much faster then iterator class (__next__)

QUESTION

Jenkins Windows Execute Command Line BitVise sexec Fails with exit 1000 at the end

Asked 2019-Jan-18 at 15:29

I am just setting up a new Jenkins system on Windows server 2016.

One of my build steps is to execute a batch file that I have been using with FinalBuilder.

This batch file creates a 7z backup of my existing web site before over writing it.

Here is my command in Jenkins (some parameters obviously changed for privacy in this post):

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jan-18 at 15:29

Finally figured out a way to make this work.

I changed my direct execution of the sexec in jenkins to be a call to a batch file from Jenkins.

Then in the batch file I have the code:

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54205526

QUESTION

Jenkins parameter Release versus Staging

Asked 2019-Jan-17 at 19:15

I created a freestyle job in Jenkins that I just set up (latest version).

I added parameters to it. One of those is a Options selection for ReleaseType with the options of Staging and Release.

One of the build steps is executing a remote command on the server when the site is uploaded to. It uses the Execute Windows Batch Command build step.

Here is the command line (with things made generic):

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Jan-17 at 19:15

If you use the -Command parameter it implies you are going to write raw PowerShell code in between the quotation marks that follow (allow you can call a script as you have).

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54241027

QUESTION

Generator function (yield) much faster then iterator class (__next__)

Asked 2017-May-13 at 19:09

UPDATE (mirroring the state-of-the-art knowledge level) status: 2017-05-12

The reason for this update is the fact that at the time I was asking this question I was not aware that I have discovered something about how Python3 works "under the hood".

The conclusion from all what will follow is:

If you write own Python3 code for an iterator and care about speed of execution you should write it as a generator function and not as an iterator class.

Below a minimalistic code example demonstrating that the same algorithm (here: self-made version of Pythons range()) expressed as a generator function runs much faster than if expressed as an iterator class:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-May-05 at 23:48

The class with __next__ version is the one suitable to be implemented as a Python extension module because there is no equivalent of yield in C, so it makes sense to find out how it could be improved in order to perform comparable to the function with yield variant.

Write it in C already. The performance difference you're seeing is solely due to properties of the Python implementation that do not apply to the C extension module you're planning to write. Optimizations you could apply to the Python class would not be applicable to the C code.

For example, accessing instance variables is more expensive than accessing local variables in Python code, because instance variable access requires several dict lookups. Your C implementation will not require such dict lookups.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43729052

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install sexec

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: